Log in

View Full Version : Did The Newt Disappear?


Guest
02-25-2012, 11:05 PM
Have not heard anything about The Newt recently. He must be hiding in the background enjoying watching the Romney meltdown and Santorum creep up (pun intended, by all means) in the polls.

The Newt did have some memorable quotations, though.

''There's no question at times of my life, partially driven by how passionately I felt about this country, that I worked far too hard and things happened in my life that were not appropriate.''
—GOP presidential candidate Newt Gingrich, explaining in 2011 why he cheated on his first two wives. He carried on the first affair while his wife was suffering from cancer, and the second while he was orchestrating Bill Clinton's impeachment.

Guest
02-26-2012, 09:44 AM
Newt's biggest fan, and one of few, is Newt. His ego is only surpassed by his idiocy. :doh:

Guest
02-26-2012, 11:52 AM
But I think he could stand up straight before a Saudi King and not grovel to the Afghans.

Guest
02-26-2012, 11:58 AM
But I think he could stand up straight before a Saudi King and not grovel to the Afghans.

nice one.

Guest
02-26-2012, 02:58 PM
So, I would have to ask Posh and Richie if they agree with The Newt's morals (or lack of them) when he cheated on his first two wives? He carried on the first affair while his wife was suffering from cancer, and the second while he was orchestrating Bill Clinton's impeachment.

Long answers that try to convolute the question are not necessary. Just a simple Yes, you agree with his morals or No, you do not agree with his morals.

Guest
02-26-2012, 03:37 PM
So, I would have to ask Posh and Richie if they agree with The Newt's morals (or lack of them) when he cheated on his first two wives? He carried on the first affair while his wife was suffering from cancer, and the second while he was orchestrating Bill Clinton's impeachment.

Long answers that try to convolute the question are not necessary. Just a simple Yes, you agree with his morals or No, you do not agree with his morals.

I have to say about as much as I approve of JFK's dalliances.

Guest
02-26-2012, 03:39 PM
So, is that a Yes or a No?

Guest
02-26-2012, 03:50 PM
So, is that a Yes or a No?

It means I don't give a rats azz.

Guest
02-26-2012, 03:54 PM
After Bill Clinton's indiscretions and the subsequent protection of him and the ridiculing of those who took issue, I scoff at any liberal who tries to bait me as you are. Nice try Buggy, but stow that blather.

Newt Gingrinch may be a flawed husband, but he'd be a better President in all aspects than the clownish, naive and destructive current occupant of the people's house.

Guest
02-26-2012, 04:13 PM
After Bill Clinton's indiscretions and the subsequent protection of him and the ridiculing of those who took issue, I scoff at any liberal who tries to bait me as you are. Nice try Buggy, but stow that blather.

New Gingrinch may be a flawed husband, but he'd be a better President in all aspects than the clownish, naive and destructive current occupant of the people's house.

Who is "New Gingrinch"? You'll need lots more posts like this to catch graci and her world record of over 9000 posts. Any other crap like this that comes to mind will help achieve that goal.

Guest
02-26-2012, 04:20 PM
Who is "New Gingrinch"? You'll need lots more posts like this to catch graci and her world record of over 9000 posts. Any other crap like this that comes to mind will help achieve that goal.

This one counts also.....


http://i921.photobucket.com/albums/ad51/wakytimes/images-2.jpg

Guest
02-26-2012, 04:25 PM
Who is "New Gingrinch"? You'll need lots more posts like this to catch graci and her world record of over 9000 posts. Any other crap like this that comes to mind will help achieve that goal.

Now that's anal.

Guest
02-26-2012, 04:33 PM
Now that's anal.

Clinton, JFK, Roosevelt, among others had their problems with infidelity. The difference is that their spouses stayed with them despite the indescretions, and they were able to keep their marriages together, for what that is worth. The other difference is that they managed to govern very effectively and ethically, while NG was being found in violation of ethics rules and censured by his peers. He is a footnote to history, and an insignificant loser who never won even a statewide election. Let's get on with the dialogue and forget this lowlife.

Guest
02-26-2012, 04:41 PM
Clinton, JFK, Roosevelt, among others had their problems with infidelity. The difference is that their spouses stayed with them despite the indescretions, and they were able to keep their marriages together, for what that is worth. The other difference is that they managed to govern very effectively and ethically, while NG was being found in violation of ethics rules and censured by his peers. He is a footnote to history, and an insignificant loser who never won even a statewide election. Let's get on with the dialogue and forget this lowlife.

Newt Gingrich is what this tread, or "dialogue" was about. Aren't you paying attention.