Have not heard anything about The Newt recently. He must be hiding in the background enjoying watching the Romney meltdown and Santorum creep up (pun intended, by all means) in the polls.

The Newt did have some memorable quotations, though.

''There's no question at times of my life, partially driven by how passionately I felt about this country, that I worked far too hard and things happened in my life that were not appropriate.''
—GOP presidential candidate Newt Gingrich, explaining in 2011 why he cheated on his first two wives. He carried on the first affair while his wife was suffering from cancer, and the second while he was orchestrating Bill Clinton's impeachment.

Newt's biggest fan, and one of few, is Newt. His ego is only surpassed by his idiocy.

But I think he could stand up straight before a Saudi King and not grovel to the Afghans.

Originally Posted by Posh 08

But I think he could stand up straight before a Saudi King and not grovel to the Afghans.

nice one.

So, I would have to ask Posh and Richie if they agree with The Newt's morals (or lack of them) when he cheated on his first two wives? He carried on the first affair while his wife was suffering from cancer, and the second while he was orchestrating Bill Clinton's impeachment.

Long answers that try to convolute the question are not necessary. Just a simple Yes, you agree with his morals or No, you do not agree with his morals.

Originally Posted by buggyone

So, I would have to ask Posh and Richie if they agree with The Newt's morals (or lack of them) when he cheated on his first two wives? He carried on the first affair while his wife was suffering from cancer, and the second while he was orchestrating Bill Clinton's impeachment.

Long answers that try to convolute the question are not necessary. Just a simple Yes, you agree with his morals or No, you do not agree with his morals.

I have to say about as much as I approve of JFK's dalliances.

So, is that a Yes or a No?

Originally Posted by buggyone

So, is that a Yes or a No?

It means I don't give a rats azz.

After Bill Clinton's indiscretions and the subsequent protection of him and the ridiculing of those who took issue, I scoff at any liberal who tries to bait me as you are. Nice try Buggy, but stow that blather.

Newt Gingrinch may be a flawed husband, but he'd be a better President in all aspects than the clownish, naive and destructive current occupant of the people's house.

Originally Posted by RichieLion

After Bill Clinton's indiscretions and the subsequent protection of him and the ridiculing of those who took issue, I scoff at any liberal who tries to bait me as you are. Nice try Buggy, but stow that blather.

New Gingrinch may be a flawed husband, but he'd be a better President in all aspects than the clownish, naive and destructive current occupant of the people's house.

Who is "New Gingrinch"? You'll need lots more posts like this to catch graci and her world record of over 9000 posts. Any other crap like this that comes to mind will help achieve that goal.

Originally Posted by MrMark

Who is "New Gingrinch"? You'll need lots more posts like this to catch graci and her world record of over 9000 posts. Any other crap like this that comes to mind will help achieve that goal.

This one counts also.....

Originally Posted by MrMark

Who is "New Gingrinch"? You'll need lots more posts like this to catch graci and her world record of over 9000 posts. Any other crap like this that comes to mind will help achieve that goal.

Now that's anal.

Originally Posted by Posh 08

Now that's anal.

Clinton, JFK, Roosevelt, among others had their problems with infidelity. The difference is that their spouses stayed with them despite the indescretions, and they were able to keep their marriages together, for what that is worth. The other difference is that they managed to govern very effectively and ethically, while NG was being found in violation of ethics rules and censured by his peers. He is a footnote to history, and an insignificant loser who never won even a statewide election. Let's get on with the dialogue and forget this lowlife.

Originally Posted by eweissenbach

Clinton, JFK, Roosevelt, among others had their problems with infidelity. The difference is that their spouses stayed with them despite the indescretions, and they were able to keep their marriages together, for what that is worth. The other difference is that they managed to govern very effectively and ethically, while NG was being found in violation of ethics rules and censured by his peers. He is a footnote to history, and an insignificant loser who never won even a statewide election. Let's get on with the dialogue and forget this lowlife.

Newt Gingrich is what this tread, or "dialogue" was about. Aren't you paying attention.