Northern Arapaho given permit to kill bald eagles

[skyguy79]

Is there something wrong about this, or is it just me?

Native American tribe gets permit to kill bald eagles - US news - Environment - msnbc.com (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/46729054/ns/us_news-environment/)

[Graytop]

Is there something wrong about this, or is it just me?

Native American tribe gets permit to kill bald eagles - US news - Environment - msnbc.com (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/46729054/ns/us_news-environment/)

I don't like it either,....seems to be another case of the Government making exceptions or special rules for what some consider to be "minority groups". I hate saying this and I hate the political correctness associated with it even more. I guess we're supposed to make special rules for them because they got screwed out of their land two hundred years ago.

Open fire, go ahead and torch me....

[CaptJohn]

Is there something wrong about this, or is it just me?

Native American tribe gets permit to kill bald eagles - US news - Environment - msnbc.com (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/46729054/ns/us_news-environment/)

I don't see a problem. I look at it this way..................
The Native Americans were here thousands of years before the Europeans and they were good stewards of the land. Ever since our European ancestors came it's been nothing but destruction in the name of progress and greed.
Europeans killed off all the eagles to near extinction, not Native Americans.
Native Americans should be able to do anything they want without our 'permission' as they were the original 'green' citizens and will respect nature.
Something the rest of us collectively have not done and there's plenty of proof out there. I can cite litterbugs for starters.

[CaptJohn]

Graytop[/QUOTE]I guess we're supposed to make special rules for them because they got screwed out of their land two hundred years ago.

Open fire, go ahead and torch me....[/QUOTE]

Native Americans are no average 'minority group'. I say, yes the government should leave them alone! It's their religious freedom that Europeans/U.S. Govt. systematically tried to destroy and for the most part were successful. It's way past time for them to have it restored. :spoken:

[Taltarzac725]

I don't see a problem. I look at it this way..................
The Native Americans were here thousands of years before the Europeans and they were good stewards of the land. Ever since our European ancestors came it's been nothing but destruction in the name of progress and greed.
Europeans killed off all the eagles to near extinction, not Native Americans.
Native Americans should be able to do anything they want without our 'permission' as they were the original 'green' citizens and will respect nature.
Something the rest of us collectively have not done and there's plenty of proof out there. I can cite litterbugs for starters.

I agree with Captain John with some reservations (sorry!).

The tribe only got permission to kill two bald eagles.

This is part of their religion and does not seem to cause any other harm. It actually sends a message of respect for that Native American tribe's culture.

[duffysmom]

Native Americans revere the bald eagle and use their feathers in rituals; this has been a sacred part of their medicinal pratices for hundreds of years. They will be allowed to take two eagles. There are a great many eagles in the wild now and they are threatened by the loss of their habitat not by Native Americans. Many bald eagles die from lead poisening because they now eat carrion killed by toxic ammunition. It's a serious problem for eagles; over 25% of eagles who are found to be sick or injured are found to have toxic levels of lead. There is a movement for hunters to use non toxic ammunition. Also, it's not unusual to find eagles who were killed by hunters in
the wild; in my mind the lead poisening and senseless killings are more serious problems for the eagles.

[Graytop]

I don't see a problem. I look at it this way..................
The Native Americans were here thousands of years before the Europeans and they were good stewards of the land. Ever since our European ancestors came it's been nothing but destruction in the name of progress and greed.
Europeans killed off all the eagles to near extinction, not Native Americans.
Native Americans should be able to do anything they want without our 'permission' as they were the original 'green' citizens and will respect nature.
Something the rest of us collectively have not done and there's plenty of proof out there. I can cite litterbugs for starters.

Two eagles,....OK,......but I wouldn't be too ungrateful to our European ancestors. You are enjoying the fruits of their so called "progress and greed". If they hadn't conquered the existing inhabitants of this land we certainly wouldn't be here enjoying the fruits of it today,....and we certainly wouldn't be living in The Villages enjoying our lifestyle. I know it's a popular to criticize our ancestors and somehow think that we would have been more upright, or different, or done things differently,....I wonder?

Laws have been enacted to protect and reverse harm and abuse that was done early on in this country. The eagles have come back. Maybe you'd rather just move back to Europe? You may not like it but we unfortunately live in a world that is governed by the aggressive use of force. It was true when Europeans moved to this land and it's still true today. I'm not saying it's right but it's the way it is. If they hadn't driven the Indians out we certainly wouldn't be driving our golf carts around here today enjoying The Villages lifestyle.

[skyguy79]

Thanks to all on expressing their points of view. It's interesting to see how different people feel about this. However, I do have to ask why if the Native Americans want respect for their customs and way of life can't they in return show a little respect for endangered wild life that was here centuries before man first crossed the Bearing Straight to inhabited North America for the first time. Is it too much to expect for them to do a live capture and relocate the bald eagles while they are still on the endangered list?

[BobKat1]

Deleted....

[Graytop]

Thanks to all on expressing their points of view. It's interesting to see how different people feel about this. However, I do have to ask why if the Native Americans want respect for their customs and way of life can't they in return show a little respect for endangered wild life that was here centuries before man first crossed the Bearing Straight to inhabited North America for the first time. Is it too much to expect for them to do a live capture and relocate the bald eagles while they are still on the endangered list?

Thanks for starting the thread.... CaptJohn, I apologize for being so adament on here, I'm far too outspoken. I need to chill a bit.

[redwitch]

Skyguy, one thing to remember is that bald eagles are no longer endangered. They are still threatened but not endangered. I think eagles are magnificent birds, but, then, I love all raptors.

The idea of killing such a beautiful bird is heartbreaking to me. At the same time, I've seen the rituals Native American tribes use when killing a sacred animal. It is not a lighthearted killing. It is done with love and reverence and thanks. So, while on a personal level I don't like it, I do understand allowing the killing and, so long as it is limited to two, I can live with it without protest.

[daca55]

I agree that the Native Americans should be able to do what they want as this was their land and we took it away from them. That said if you travel this vast country you will undoubtedly see the Native Americans taking it back as observed by the many casinos they now own. The bottom line is they are getting the last laugh on the people who took their land away from them and they are making a fortune doing it. I know I for one have left many EAGLES on the tables of their gaming houses. :spoken:

[Uptown Girl]

Skyguy, one thing to remember is that bald eagles are no longer endangered. They are still threatened but not endangered. I think eagles are magnificent birds, but, then, I love all raptors.

The idea of killing such a beautiful bird is heartbreaking to me. At the same time, I've seen the rituals Native American tribes use when killing a sacred animal. It is not a lighthearted killing. It is done with love and reverence and thanks. So, while on a personal level I don't like it, I do understand allowing the killing and, so long as it is limited to two, I can live with it without protest.

I agree. One must walk a mile in their moccasins before judging.

[batman911]

I wonder what the Bald Eagles think about that ruling. Killing anything to decorate your head seems stupid to me. Maybe that's why they lost their land.

[skyguy79]

I wonder what the Bald Eagles think about that ruling. Killing anything to decorate your head seems stupid to me. Maybe that's why they lost their land.Careful batman, the Arapaho could switch from Eagles to Bats! :evil6:

[duffysmom]

I wonder what the Bald Eagles think about that ruling. Killing anything to decorate your head seems stupid to me. Maybe that's why they lost their land.

...

[Shimpy]

I have no problem with this. I love watching eagles flying and hunting, but sacrificing only 2 eagles seems like a small price to pay to these Indians who where here thousands of year before us. We stole their land, then gave them a few acres to live on under our rule. That was just what Hitler was trying to do to the world and we said was so wrong. These people lived on the land with nature for thousands of years and we took their land and lifestyle away and told them how we want them to live. The least we could do is let them have 2 eagles which is rightly theirs anyway.

[Quixote]

Two eagles,....OK,......but I wouldn't be too ungrateful to our European ancestors. You are enjoying the fruits of their so called "progress and greed". If they hadn't conquered the existing inhabitants of this land we certainly wouldn't be here enjoying the fruits of it today,....and we certainly wouldn't be living in The Villages enjoying our lifestyle. I know it's a popular to criticize our ancestors and somehow think that we would have been more upright, or different, or done things differently,....I wonder?

Laws have been enacted to protect and reverse harm and abuse that was done early on in this country. The eagles have come back. Maybe you'd rather just move back to Europe? You may not like it but we unfortunately live in a world that is governed by the aggressive use of force. It was true when Europeans moved to this land and it's still true today. I'm not saying it's right but it's the way it is. If they hadn't driven the Indians out we certainly wouldn't be driving our golf carts around here today enjoying The Villages lifestyle.

Let's see what "conquered the existing inhabitants" and "driven the Indians out" means. Here are only a handful of bits of American history: The Trail of Tears, in which the Cherokee were forced out of their homes and off their land on a moment's notice without the chance to take anything in the middle of winter, and thousands died in the forced march in the cold and snow. (We don't hesitate to lament something very similar that the Japanese did to U.S. prisoners of war during World War II!) Bosque Redondo, where the Native Americans were virtually used for target practice. Wounded Knee, not the 20th century takeover but the 19th century massacre of hundreds of Native Americans, many of them women and children. Visit Canyon de Chelly out west and read the historical plaques. Native Americans being given the blankets of soldiers who had died of smallpox, one of the earliest examples of biological warfare, except that the Natives were not at war but instead were being victimized. (And today we focus on "dirty bombs"!)

Even legal treaties were not honored (and many so-called "treaties" were illegal) and countless promises broken. Land was literally stolen from the Seneca Nation in western New York to create the city of Buffalo, and ironically today's Senecas notice that they have turned their nation around, while the upstate cities across New York are turning into a "rust belt." The Mashantucket Pequot in central Connecticut were accepted by the local Ledyard community when the reservation consisted of one old wooden house with no plumbing occupied by a elderly women and her seven children, but when the nation became so successful with Foxwoods, how much they were resented! Let's also remember that many Native American nations fought on the side of the Colonies against Great Britain in the Revolutionary War and the War of 1812. Others gave their lives, some to the North and others to the South, during the Civil War. The only military communication code developed during World War II that was never broken was created by Navajos using their native language.

Locally, in the southern end of Sumter County (Bushnell), the battle that started the Second Seminole War took place at what is now Dade Battlefield State Park. At the time of the annual reenactment of the battle early in January this year, the Daily Sun ran a feature about "Our Fallen Heroes," referring to those U.S. soldiers who died in the battle while citing none of the details about the Seminoles having attacked because they had already been told that they were going to be forced from their ancestral homes and land. Yes, to make way for our eventual golf carts! Tell me, would you lie down and cave in if you were told you would be forced out of your Villages home and lose your golf cart? I offered "the other side of the story" to the Daily Sun, but there was no interest on their part. Why can't we at least be honest and look at the whole picture?

Let's see again: Crossing the Bering Strait and so-called "minority groups." Canada has a history of tolerance toward minority groups in its recognition that every single group has contributed--and continues to contribute--to its society. Some years ago a National Geographic reporter was given an assignment to interview representatives of the various groups, and to do so he had put together a specific set of questions, including "When did your people first begin to arrive to Canada?" When he asked the representative at Kanawake, a Mohawk reservation just across the river from Montreal, the man looked at him blankly. "When did we begin to arrive to Canada? We've been here for many millennia, long before Canada even existed!"

And sacrificing two eagles (no longer on the endangered species list!) for religious purposes is such a big deal? Look at how many human beings were killed by Western society in the name of God and religion. How about the Crusades, one of whose shouted cries was "Kill them all! God will know his own!" The torture racks of the Spanish Inquisition. Right up into our lifetimes with the rise of Nazi Germany. I don't agree with the rationalization of "it's the way it is" as an attempt to justify this kind of behavior. How many Americans feel "it's the way it is" about 9/11? I certainly don't! We do look at things differently when the shoe is on the other foot, don't we?

Nothing I've written is intended to be sarcastic, since sarcasm reflects a measure of insecurity and desperation on the part of those who use it as a communication tool. If anyone is honestly interested in getting a picture of the daily life within a Native community in the 19th century and its destruction by the coming of our European ancestors, I suggest you read James Welch's Fools Crow. And if you're not interested, then please ignore this recommendation--and this whole long post.

I'm getting off my soap box of history!

[Quixote]

I wonder what the Bald Eagles think about that ruling. Killing anything to decorate your head seems stupid to me. Maybe that's why they lost their land.

Is none of us old enough to remember the millinery trade that included the extensive killing of birds to decorate women's hats with feathers, with zero religious significance but rather solely vanity? How about the killing of minks and other animals to make stoles and coats, also with zero religious significance but rather pretentiousness and materialism? Stupid indeed!

How about killing animals for the fun of it (otherwise known as sport hunting), as opposed to killing for food? Before European contact, the plains were filled with countless herds of buffalo, and the skies were filled with passenger pigeons. These creatures were respected by the Native Americans, and before killing a buffalo for food, they prayed for the soul of the animal. With the coming of Western society, the buffalo were largely killed (often for fun from moving trains heading West) and more recently had to be reintroduced in places like Yellowstone National Park, and passenger pigeons went extinct early in the 20th century. Nothing for us to be proud of!

[eremite06]

Is none of us old enough to remember the millinery trade that included the extensive killing of birds to decorate women's hats with feathers, with zero religious significance but rather solely vanity? How about the killing of minks and other animals to make stoles and coats, also with zero religious significance but rather pretentiousness and materialism? Stupid indeed!

How about killing animals for the fun of it (otherwise known as sport hunting), as opposed to killing for food? Before European contact, the plains were filled with countless herds of buffalo, and the skies were filled with passenger pigeons. These creatures were respected by the Native Americans, and before killing a buffalo for food, they prayed for the soul of the animal. With the coming of Western society, the buffalo were largely killed (often for fun from moving trains heading West) and more recently had to be reintroduced in places like Yellowstone National Park, and passenger pigeons went extinct early in the 20th century. Nothing for us to be proud of!

Allright, allright, give 'em the eagles!!! :clap2:

[duffysmom]

Let's see what "conquered the existing inhabitants" and "driven the Indians out" means. Here are only a handful of bits of American history: The Trail of Tears, in which the Cherokee were forced out of their homes and off their land on a moment's notice without the chance to take anything in the middle of winter, and thousands died in the forced march in the cold and snow. (We don't hesitate to lament something very similar that the Japanese did to U.S. prisoners of war during World War II!) Bosque Redondo, where the Native Americans were virtually used for target practice. Wounded Knee, not the 20th century takeover but the 19th century massacre of hundreds of Native Americans, many of them women and children. Visit Canyon de Chelly out west and read the historical plaques. Native Americans being given the blankets of soldiers who had died of smallpox, one of the earliest examples of biological warfare, except that the Natives were not at war but instead were being victimized. (And today we focus on "dir
Even legal treaties were not honored (and many so-called "treaties" were illegal) and countless promises broken. Land was literally stolen from the Seneca Nation in western New York to create the city of Buffalo, and ironically today's Senecas notice that they have turned their nation around, while the upstate cities across New York are turning into a "rust belt." The Mashantucket Pequot in central Connecticut were accepted by the local Ledyard community when the reservation consisted of one old wooden house with no plumbing occupied by a elderly women and her seven children, but when the nation became so successful with Foxwoods, how much they were resented! Let's also remember that many Native American nations fought on the side of the Colonies against Great Britain in the Revolutionary War and the War of 1812. Others gave their lives, some to the North and others to the South, during the Civil War. The only military communication code developed during World War II that was never broken was created by Navajos using their native language.

Locally, in the southern end of Sumter County (Bushnell), the battle that started the Second Seminole War took place at what is now Dade Battlefield State Park. At the time of the annual reenactment of the battle early in January this year, the Daily Sun ran a feature about "Our Fallen Heroes," referring to those U.S. soldiers who died in the battle while citing none of the details about the Seminoles having attacked because they had already been told that they were going to be forced from their ancestral homes and land. Yes, to make way for our eventual golf carts! Tell me, would you lie down and cave in if you were told you would be forced out of your Villages home and lose your golf cart? I offered "the other side of the story" to the Daily Sun, but there was no interest on their part. Why can't we at least be honest and look at the whole picture?

Let's see again: Crossing the Bering Strait and so-called "minority groups." Canada has a history of tolerance toward minority groups in its recognition that every single group has contributed--and continues to contribute--to its society. Some years ago a National Geographic reporter was given an assignment to interview representatives of the various groups, and to do so he had put together a specific set of questions, including "When did your people first begin to arrive to Canada?" When he asked the representative at Kanawake, a Mohawk reservation just across the river from Montreal, the man looked at him blankly. "When did we begin to arrive to Canada? We've been here for many millennia, long before Canada even existed!"

And sacrificing two eagles (no longer on the endangered species list!) for religious purposes is such a big deal? Look at how many human beings were killed by Western society in the name of God and religion. How about the Crusades, one of whose shouted cries was "Kill them all! God will know his own!" The torture racks of the Spanish Inquisition. Right up into our lifetimes with the rise of Nazi Germany. I don't agree with the rationalization of "it's the way it is" as an attempt to justify this kind of behavior. How many Americans feel "it's the way it is" about 9/11? I certainly don't! We do look at things differently when the shoe is on the other foot, don't we?

Nothing I've written is intended to be sarcastic, since sarcasm reflects a measure of insecurity and desperation on the part of those who use it as a communication tool. If anyone is honestly interested in getting a picture of the daily life within a Native community in the 19th century and its destruction by the coming of our European ancestors, I suggest you read James Welch's Fools Crow. And if you're not interested, then please ignore this recommendation--and this whole long post.

I'm getting off my soap box of history!

:bigbow: Thank you for the mini history lesson we seem to forget all too easily.
Helps to keep things in perspective.

[batman911]

Maybe they should just buy plastic eagle feathers from China.:smiley:

I believe the concept of property ownership was not in place when the bad Europeans arrived and settled the USA. That concept arrived with the Europeans. The settlers brought civilization and government with them and had the power to enforce it. For those that have severe guilt about "taking" the land from the native Americans, you could donate your property to them now and move back to your country/continent of origin. That should relieve your guilt and make everyone happy.

[Graytop]

Let's see what "conquered the existing inhabitants" and "driven the Indians out" means. Here are only a handful of bits of American history: The Trail of Tears, in which the Cherokee were forced out of their homes and off their land on a moment's notice without the chance to take anything in the middle of winter, and thousands died in the forced march in the cold and snow. (We don't hesitate to lament something very similar that the Japanese did to U.S. prisoners of war during World War II!) Bosque Redondo, where the Native Americans were virtually used for target practice. Wounded Knee, not the 20th century takeover but the 19th century massacre of hundreds of Native Americans, many of them women and children. Visit Canyon de Chelly out west and read the historical plaques. Native Americans being given the blankets of soldiers who had died of smallpox, one of the earliest examples of biological warfare, except that the Natives were not at war but instead were being victimized. (And today we focus on "dirty bombs"!)

Even legal treaties were not honored (and many so-called "treaties" were illegal) and countless promises broken. Land was literally stolen from the Seneca Nation in western New York to create the city of Buffalo, and ironically today's Senecas notice that they have turned their nation around, while the upstate cities across New York are turning into a "rust belt." The Mashantucket Pequot in central Connecticut were accepted by the local Ledyard community when the reservation consisted of one old wooden house with no plumbing occupied by a elderly women and her seven children, but when the nation became so successful with Foxwoods, how much they were resented! Let's also remember that many Native American nations fought on the side of the Colonies against Great Britain in the Revolutionary War and the War of 1812. Others gave their lives, some to the North and others to the South, during the Civil War. The only military communication code developed during World War II that was never broken was created by Navajos using their native language.

Locally, in the southern end of Sumter County (Bushnell), the battle that started the Second Seminole War took place at what is now Dade Battlefield State Park. At the time of the annual reenactment of the battle early in January this year, the Daily Sun ran a feature about "Our Fallen Heroes," referring to those U.S. soldiers who died in the battle while citing none of the details about the Seminoles having attacked because they had already been told that they were going to be forced from their ancestral homes and land. Yes, to make way for our eventual golf carts! Tell me, would you lie down and cave in if you were told you would be forced out of your Villages home and lose your golf cart? I offered "the other side of the story" to the Daily Sun, but there was no interest on their part. Why can't we at least be honest and look at the whole picture?

Let's see again: Crossing the Bering Strait and so-called "minority groups." Canada has a history of tolerance toward minority groups in its recognition that every single group has contributed--and continues to contribute--to its society. Some years ago a National Geographic reporter was given an assignment to interview representatives of the various groups, and to do so he had put together a specific set of questions, including "When did your people first begin to arrive to Canada?" When he asked the representative at Kanawake, a Mohawk reservation just across the river from Montreal, the man looked at him blankly. "When did we begin to arrive to Canada? We've been here for many millennia, long before Canada even existed!"

And sacrificing two eagles (no longer on the endangered species list!) for religious purposes is such a big deal? Look at how many human beings were killed by Western society in the name of God and religion. How about the Crusades, one of whose shouted cries was "Kill them all! God will know his own!" The torture racks of the Spanish Inquisition. Right up into our lifetimes with the rise of Nazi Germany. I don't agree with the rationalization of "it's the way it is" as an attempt to justify this kind of behavior. How many Americans feel "it's the way it is" about 9/11? I certainly don't! We do look at things differently when the shoe is on the other foot, don't we?

Nothing I've written is intended to be sarcastic, since sarcasm reflects a measure of insecurity and desperation on the part of those who use it as a communication tool. If anyone is honestly interested in getting a picture of the daily life within a Native community in the 19th century and its destruction by the coming of our European ancestors, I suggest you read James Welch's Fools Crow. And if you're not interested, then please ignore this recommendation--and this whole long post.

I'm getting off my soap box of history!

Thanks for sharing...

[Quixote]

:bigbow: Thank you for the mini history lesson we seem to forget all too easily. Helps to keep things in perspective.

True, some have forgotten but at least are receptive to being reminded. Some never knew but at least are open to learning. And then there are others who manage to show their arrogance and ignorance, their disdain for any fellow human beings who don't fit their stereotypes, and the sarcasm that comes from their desperation and insecurity. So much is evident about individuals who choose this latter path. And how sad....

[CaptJohn]

True, some have forgotten but at least are receptive to being reminded. Some never knew but at least are open to learning. And then there are others who manage to show their arrogance and ignorance, their disdain for any fellow human beings who don't fit their stereotypes, and the sarcasm that comes from their desperation and insecurity. So much is evident about individuals who choose this latter path. And how sad....

Thanks for coming up with the words I have been searching for.
You speak for me as well.