Active soldier Gary Stein who called President Obama the enemy on Facebook.

[Guest]

Gary Stein Case: Judge Won't Block Discharge Effort Against Marine Who Called Obama 'Enemy' (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/13/obama-gary-stein_n_1424684.html)

I can understand that soldiers on active duty should have their rights to free speech limited because of their jobs and national security but this seems to be going a little too far?

It does look like a stupid thing to do-- to post comments against your Commander-in-Chief (CIC) on Facebook which also include a statement that you will not follow his orders. Except how many low level soldiers actually get orders from the CIC?? I see that he is a Sergeant in the Marine Corps.

[Guest]

By calling President Obama "the Domestic Enemy", the Marine is basically guilty of treason. He is lucky the military has only decided to give him an undesirable discharge instead of charging him with treason. If the Marine is discharged, I am sure he will be on the FBI watch list, too, as a possible threat against Pres. Obama.

That is not just for Pres. Obama, but for any president. I was not wild about the Johnson (Lyndon - not Andrew!) administration policies when I was in the Army but did not speak out against them. Same way for the Bush administrations - a soldier did not have the "free speech" to call either Senior or Junior Bush a Domestic Enemy during the Iraq invasions and occupations.

People have to learn consequences of posting material on Facebook as it will affect future events to them be it in school, military, or a job.

[Guest]

Oh crap Buggyone, I have to agree with you again. What is this world coming to. Actually all orders come from the Commander in Chief, down thru the chain of command. Now lets be real, we all know that he does not actually, give every order, but following the chain of command, what ever military person does, comes from a chain of command that is topped by the Commander in Chief, IE., the current sitting President. What the Marine Corps is doing is correct, that young seargent disrespected the Commander in Chief and now must be held accountable for his actions.

[Guest]

I must also agree with you on this one. It's not often I get to do that. When you're in the military the rules are a bit different. You don't actually lose your free speech rights, but those rights don't necessarily apply when you're addressing your superiors.

P.S. I am very pleased to see you are posting serious thoughts again in between some of you more jocular postings. It makes things way more interesting.

[Guest]

http://cape.army.mil/repository/materials/WhenSoldiersSpeakOut.pdf

[Guest]

Your article just proved proof that the Marine Corps did right. Thanks.

[Guest]

Your article just proved proof that the Marine Corps did right. Thanks.

even a Marine cannot be protected from the disease of "Dumb-ass."

[Guest]

even a Marine cannot be protected from the disease of "Dumb-ass."

It seems that the DA Gene is alive and well, not only in the military, but has infected all of our current administration. Live long and, Oh well, guess we won't see much of the prosper.

[Guest]

Well I agree that the Sgt committed a military faux pas and subsequently penalties will follow.

The problem I am having with all of this is that the Sgt is spot on in his criticisms. This withdrawalist is the last guy I would follow anywhere.

A Commander In Chief must inspire not perspire.:spoken:

[Guest]

Well I agree that the Sgt committed a military faux pas and subsequently penalties will follow.

The problem I am having with all of this is that the Sgt is spot on in his criticisms. This withdrawalist is the last guy I would follow anywhere.

A Commander In Chief must inspire not perspire.:spoken:



Assessing President Obama on Military Operations, National Security and the War on Terror - Brookings Institution (http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2011/1026_obama_ohanlon.aspx)

"It is too soon to size up Obama’s overall record because the trajectory of policy in all these theaters is still too hard to predict. But on balance, the president has been resolute, focused and nonideological in his foreign policy — a very pragmatic and fairly impressive record." from the above linked article from the Brookings Institution on Obama's military policy.

[Guest]

Assessing President Obama on Military Operations, National Security and the War on Terror - Brookings Institution (http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2011/1026_obama_ohanlon.aspx)

"It is too soon to size up Obama’s overall record because the trajectory of policy in all these theaters is still too hard to predict. But on balance, the president has been resolute, focused and nonideological in his foreign policy — a very pragmatic and fairly impressive record." from the above linked article from the Brookings Institution on Obama's military policy.

Hi Taltarzac725: And I'll bet you Iran, Russia, China, Pakistan, North Korea ,Kyrgyzstan, Afghanistan UN Security Council et al would agree with Obama's overall record And let's not forget the opinions albeit adverse eminating from France, Britian, Germany, Italy, et al. But no matter the liberal media have proclaimed Obama the Chief Commander in Chief.

[Guest]

I doubt if the ghost of Osama bin Laden would say that President Obama is the domestic enemy of the US. Hmm, let's see, under which US President's administration was bin Laden hunted down and killed? Junior Bush! No, that is wrong, Junior, go stand in the corner with your dunce hat on - AGAIN!

[Guest]

Oh, Buggyone, we must agree to disagree this time. Bush set in motion all the intel that lead to OSL be wacked. Obama just happened to be in office at the time. Credit goes to the Nave Seals.

[Guest]

I doubt if the ghost of Osama bin Laden would say that President Obama is the domestic enemy of the US. Hmm, let's see, under which US President's administration was bin Laden hunted down and killed? Junior Bush! No, that is wrong, Junior, go stand in the corner with your dunce hat on - AGAIN!

Buggyone: Now come you know their was an active call for the capture of bin laden from 9/11. To credit Obama with bin laden's death is to credit Obama for being smart enough to drink water or to eat. By the way there was criticism thatby killing bin laden and not capturing him valuable intelligence was lost.Should Obama accept credit fore that too? Probably not? However Obama may receive criticism for allowing too many drone attacks that are killing rather than capturing important al Queada leaders and gathering intelligence.

Bush is no longer the president, obama is andalong with that priviledge comes the responsibility of the decisions rendered. Obama demeaned Bush at every turn blamed him for his own mistakes and continues to do so. However, Bush has maintained silence and has shown respect toward Obama as the commander in chief. Bush has class

[Guest]

Oh, Buggyone, we must agree to disagree this time. Bush set in motion all the intel that lead to OSL be wacked. Obama just happened to be in office at the time. Credit goes to the Nave Seals.

Figmo,

Credit does go to Navy Seals for their fine work. But saying Bush set in motion all the intel that lead to the killing of bin Laden is absurd. Bush was in office until 2009.

Pull up your big boy pants (O.D. in color) and admit that Junior Bush was totally lost when it came to the whereabouts of bin Laden.

[Guest]

Buggyone, everyone was totally in the dark with the whereabouts of Osama. Pakastan was helping to hid him and was doing a very fine job of it. Someone there messed up and the rest is history. BTW, my big boy pants are just fine, but you might want to check yours, all is not so great in our fine country right now.