Paul Ryan -- Sarah Palin Redux?

[Guest]

The choice of Paul Ryan is a sign of weakness not of strength. With the election less than 90 days away and the popular vote now trending away from him, Romney apparently now feels the need to select a highly speculative vice-presidential nominee who, yes, can enrapture his often-doubtful conservative base and consolidate his party's 35-40% turnout, but what more?

Stephen Schlesinger: Raul Ryan -- Sarah Palin Redux? (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/stephen-schlesinger/raul-ryan----sarah-palin_b_1768232.html)

[Guest]

The choice of Paul Ryan is a sign of weakness not of strength. With the election less than 90 days away and the popular vote now trending away from him, Romney apparently now feels the need to select a highly speculative vice-presidential nominee who, yes, can enrapture his often-doubtful conservative base and consolidate his party's 35-40% turnout, but what more?

Stephen Schlesinger: Raul Ryan -- Sarah Palin Redux? (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/stephen-schlesinger/raul-ryan----sarah-palin_b_1768232.html)

I agree with this. Paul Ryan was a poor choice by Mitt Romney. The positives-- The names are alliterative and Ryan has a very attractive family. I actually liked Sarah Palin a lot more as a person than Paul Ryan too. The negatives-- Paul Ryan used to hand out books by Ayn Ryan and extolled her philosophy. Something about loving the philosophy of Ayn Rand really turns my stomach. Especially in a politician. To me, Ayn Rand stands for elitism and turning your back on people who need help to get by in this world. She smacks of Social Darwinism and the survival of the fittest in social circles. This is OK if you are in some cuthroat business but it is no way to run a country or state or city.

[Guest]

I have to disagree with this one. I don't think Sarah could come close to the ability of Ryan.

[Guest]

I have to disagree with this one. I don't think Sarah could come close to the ability of Ryan.

I meant that Sarah Palin was a better pick for John McCain than Ryan's is for Romney. Mainly because of how easy the politicos will have with attacking Ryan on his love of Ayn Rand's philosophy. Ryan has tried to distance himself from his former love of this writer's work over the past few months because even Ryan sees what a problem this may become.

I agree that Palin had a lot of problems. Palin did often talk without thinking about what she was saying and was often very ignorant about politics in many areas.

[Guest]

This is all ridiculous. Romney was running, like it or not you lefties, on Ryan's budget plan. Now he's chosen the author of this plan, who is also the head of the Congressional Budget Commitee, to be his running mate. This is a serious choice and one that will make the budgetary differences between the failed Obama Administration as opposed to Romney's platform explode in stark contrasts.

The leftists will have to rely on their compliant lamestream mainstream media to bury this issue with their usual "take no prisoners" approach to reporting on conservatives.

You guys are not going to be able to pull a "Sarah Palin" on articulate Paul Ryan, in any event.

Obama doesn't have a convincing or commanding lead anywhere. All Romney and Ryan have to do is convince the "independents" of their vision and everything could change in very short order.

This is just the beginning and you unrepentant leftists think the game over?

A rude awakening is coming for you guys.

[Guest]

This is all ridiculous. Romney was running, like it or not you lefties, on Ryan's budget plan. Now he's chosen the author of this plan, who is also the head of the Congressional Budget Commitee, to be his running mate. This is a serious choice and one that will make the budgetary differences between the failed Obama Administration as opposed to Romney's platform explode in stark contrasts.

The leftists will have to rely on their compliant lamestream mainstream media to bury this issue with their usual "take no prisoners" approach to reporting on conservatives.

You guys are not going to be able to pull a "Sarah Palin" on articulate Paul Ryan, in any event.

Obama doesn't have a convincing or commanding lead anywhere. All Romney and Ryan have to do is convince the "independents" of their vision and everything could change in very short order.

This is just the beginning and you unrepentant leftists think the game over?

A rude awakening is coming for you guys.

It will be a very hard sell of Mitt Romney/Paul Ryan to anyone but the very hardcore Republican base. Sarah Palin a least when she was chosen by the McCain campaign was a Governor with a good reputation in her state. Paul Ryan comes with a lot of baggage that will be very difficult to sell to people outside the fanatical Republicans who seem to support anyone who is part of the Republican political machine.

[Guest]

Will the Romney Ryan duo take on even their own party to battle the deficit problem? If they would fight both parties to bring down the deficit, they would have my vote. I will watch closely in the next few weeks.

[Guest]

Will the Romney Ryan duo take on even their own party to battle the deficit problem? If they would fight both parties to bring down the deficit, they would have my vote. I will watch closely in the next few weeks.

I have not heard any negative comments from the Republican side of the fence with respect to Paul Ryan's pick.

[Guest]

It will be a very hard sell of Mitt Romney/Paul Ryan to anyone but the very hardcore Republican base. Sarah Palin a least when she was chosen by the McCain campaign was a Governor with a good reputation in her state. Paul Ryan comes with a lot of baggage that will be very difficult to sell to people outside the fanatical Republicans who seem to support anyone who is part of the Republican political machine.

I think you're totally "out there" with this thinking. It's only the entitled liberal who's going to view Ryan as you've suggested. The American people know the country's economy is crashing and burning and Obama has only empty words and tired talking points to offer.

Romney and Ryan are proposing real time solutions; emphasizing how the proven resource of American exceptionalism, translated into hard work and shared sacrifice will vault this country out of Obama's depression and back on the road to solvency.

All the left has is whining and finger pointing and violent imagery.

I think I know which strategy is going to inspire the votes of the independents.

[Guest]

what a mistake.

[Guest]

what a mistake.

It's only liberals who think so.

[Guest]

it is nothing more than the party line...no credence what so ever....just the faithful remaining true to their guy which is fine.

I would like to hear more from the opposition about why Ryan is such a bad pick instead of the really wacked out comparison to to Palin. How about some specific reasons why you think he is a bad choice.

What we know is he will in fact do battle with his own party as well as the other side of the aisle to get a budget.
This is the very thing the Obama administration is most fearful of....Romney and Ryan might just do what they say they are going to do.

So far just like on this forum all we get is the distractions.

Another couple of questions for the Obama supporters; is it OK with you that there is no budget (just a simple yes or no and not a bunch of excuses or red herrings). And in the unlikely event an answer is put forth...the second part is if yes, why is it OK?

btk

[Guest]

it is nothing more than the party line...no credence what so ever....just the faithful remaining true to their guy which is fine.

I would like to hear more from the opposition about why Ryan is such a bad pick instead of the really wacked out comparison to to Palin. How about some specific reasons why you think he is a bad choice.

What we know is he will in fact do battle with his own party as well as the other side of the aisle to get a budget.
This is the very thing the Obama administration is most fearful of....Romney and Ryan might just do what they say they are going to do.

So far just like on this forum all we get is the distractions.

Another couple of questions for the Obama supporters; is it OK with you that there is no budget (just a simple yes or no and not a bunch of excuses or red herrings). And in the unlikely event an answer is put forth...the second part is if yes, why is it OK?

btk

NO.

[Guest]

Ryan - another Con who has NEVER had a job. Before he was elected to Congress Ryan worked in his family business, Ryan Inc. Central, a construction firm his great-granddady founded. It's always the silver-spooners with the biggest family handouts who resent government aid the most. Ryan is the ultimate Washington insider - you know, the ones Willard keeps criticizing.

Ryan voted for steep educational cuts involving Head Start and college aid.

Ryan voted for a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage.

Ryan is against against gay adoptions

Ryan is against a hate-crimes law

Ryan is against abortion

Ryan is against gun control.

Ryan is against raising the minimum wage.

Ryan is against the Dodd-Frank financial reform bill.

Ryan voted against the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, which helps women fight for equal pay for equal work.

Ryan was a faithful rubber-stamp of the reckless economic policies of the Bush administration.

Wasn't it Newt who referred to Ryan's (now Romney's) budget as "right-wing social engineering"?

The Ostroy Report: <a name="81312">How Ryan Just Sank Romney's Campaign</a> (http://www.ostroyreport.com/2012/08/why-ryan-just-sank-romneys-campaign.html)

[Guest]

According to the New York Times "Ryan shunned the 'Grand Bargain' to end the debt-ceiling standoff because, in part, he feared a it would be a boost for President Obama in 2012.


http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/13/us/politics/family-faith-and-politics-describe-life-of-paul-ryan.html?_r=1

[Guest]

Ryan - another Con who has NEVER had a job. Before he was elected to Congress Ryan worked in his family business, Ryan Inc. Central, a construction firm his great-granddady founded. It's always the silver-spooners with the biggest family handouts who resent government aid the most. Ryan is the ultimate Washington insider - you know, the ones Willard keeps criticizing.

Ryan voted for steep educational cuts involving Head Start and college aid.

Ryan voted for a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage.

Ryan is against against gay adoptions

Ryan is against a hate-crimes law

Ryan is against abortion

Ryan is against gun control.

Ryan is against raising the minimum wage.

Ryan is against the Dodd-Frank financial reform bill.

Ryan voted against the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, which helps women fight for equal pay for equal work.

Ryan was a faithful rubber-stamp of the reckless economic policies of the Bush administration.

Wasn't it Newt who referred to Ryan's (now Romney's) budget as "right-wing social engineering"?

The Ostroy Report: <a name="81312">How Ryan Just Sank Romney's Campaign</a> (http://www.ostroyreport.com/2012/08/why-ryan-just-sank-romneys-campaign.html)

That pretty much sums up the Ryan/Romney ticket. That's right, the conservative Repubs have forced Romney to select their man Ryan and Romney is now playing second fiddle. Romney will do anything to become President. :ohdear:

[Guest]

But he is such a cute little fella.

[Guest]

Romney-Ryan & Rand | Scoop News (http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL1208/S00058/romney-ryan-rand.htm)

This paints a very humorous picture.

[Guest]

Romney-Ryan & Rand | Scoop News (http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL1208/S00058/romney-ryan-rand.htm)

This paints a very humorous picture.






Palin looks like a moderate next to this guy .......

[Guest]

I have to control myself from:1rotfl::1rotfl::1rotfl: when I hear some of you talk about what jobs Ryan did not have before being elected to congress. Let's just say, to be polite (I am working at it) that he certainly is no worse in that regard than Obama was. Nobody could ever state what "real job" Obama ever has.

And now for my usual...instead of the anticipated now let's spend our time ripping him to shreds, how about you Obama supporters tell us what Obama/Biden are going to do about the some of the issues Romney/Ryan are committing? Put your character assassination guns away and let's hear what your party is committing to do to fix America.

btk

[Guest]

I have to control myself from:1rotfl::1rotfl::1rotfl: when I hear some of you talk about what jobs Ryan did not have before being elected to congress. Let's just say, to be polite (I am working at it) that he certainly is no worse in that regard than Obama was. Nobody could ever state what "real job" Obama ever has.

And now for my usual...instead of the anticipated now let's spend our time ripping him to shreds, how about you Obama supporters tell us what Obama/Biden are going to do about the some of the issues Romney/Ryan are committing? Put your character assassination guns away and let's hear what your party is committing to do to fix America.

btk






Ryan and Willard are the challengers (and traling badly) - why don't they tell us why they are an acceptable alternative?

They can begin with the basic stuff - like telling us why they refuse to release previous tax returns.

[Guest]

Ryan is probably a good husband ,father,and American. I just do not agree what he stands for and what he believes is good for America. He wants to slash taxes for the rich and gut the government. He doesn't want to fix medicare he wants to kill it. He voted for the Bush tax cuts for the rich,war with Iraq,and the Bush medicare prescription drug plan. He proposes cutting just about every program except defense and that bothers me.

[Guest]

Agree 100% that Ryan is probably a good husband ,father,and American.

[Guest]

Ryan is probably a good husband ,father,and American. I just do not agree what he stands for and what he believes is good for America. He wants to slash taxes for the rich and gut the government. He doesn't want to fix medicare he wants to kill it. He voted for the Bush tax cuts for the rich,war with Iraq,and the Bush medicare prescription drug plan. He proposes cutting just about every program except defense and that bothers me.

That bothers me too. He does look like a very good and decent family man as does Mitt Romney and President Barack Obama.

[Guest]

Ryan and Willard are the challengers (and traling badly) - why don't they tell us why they are an acceptable alternative?

They can begin with the basic stuff - like telling us why they refuse to release previous tax returns.

the romney/ryan ticket is apparently in favor of the acceptable alternative to falied fiscal policy, and bigger government for starters.

[Guest]

the romney/ryan ticket is apparently in favor of the acceptable alternative to falied fiscal policy, and bigger government for starters.





what is "the acceptable alternative"?

..... this is gonna be good .........

[Guest]

Ryan - another Con who has NEVER had a job. Before he was elected to Congress Ryan worked in his family business, Ryan Inc. Central, a construction firm his great-granddady founded. It's always the silver-spooners with the biggest family handouts who resent government aid the most. Ryan is the ultimate Washington insider - you know, the ones Willard keeps criticizing.

Ryan voted for steep educational cuts involving Head Start and college aid.

Ryan voted for a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage.

Ryan is against against gay adoptions

Ryan is against a hate-crimes law

Ryan is against abortion

Ryan is against gun control.

Ryan is against raising the minimum wage.

Ryan is against the Dodd-Frank financial reform bill.

Ryan voted against the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, which helps women fight for equal pay for equal work.

Ryan was a faithful rubber-stamp of the reckless economic policies of the Bush administration.

Wasn't it Newt who referred to Ryan's (now Romney's) budget as "right-wing social engineering"?

The Ostroy Report: <a name="81312">How Ryan Just Sank Romney's Campaign</a> (http://www.ostroyreport.com/2012/08/why-ryan-just-sank-romneys-campaign.html)

and your point is?

[Guest]

and your point is?

They have no point, most of them.....the presses just started rolling today with all the anti Ryan stuff and they rush to get it out. You do not have to understand what you are saying, you just have to know how to post it.

Most cannot ever answer a question on any details.....they just do what they have been told is right...details to follow I suppose !

Ever notice when you ask WHY or EXPLAIN,they never come back !

[Guest]

The point is- Ryan is far from the mainstream of American thought. Far, far right.

[Guest]

The point is- Ryan is far from the mainstream of American thought. Far, far right.

If you said...IN MY OPINION meaning Yours would go with it,but trust me you do not speak for the mainstream of america

And if you do, that is a link for credibility I really want to see

[Guest]

[QUOTE=Guest;539469]I have to control myself from:1rotfl::1rotfl::1rotfl: when I hear some of you talk about what jobs Ryan did not have before being elected to congress. Let's just say, to be polite (I am working at it) that he certainly is no worse in that regard than Obama was. Nobody could ever state what "real job" Obama ever has."
__________________________________________________ _

From 1992 until his election to the U.S. Senate in 2004, Barack Obama served as a professor in the Law School. He was a Lecturer from 1992 to 1996. He was a Senior Lecturer from 1996 to 2004, during which time he taught three courses per year. Senior Lecturers are considered to be members of the Law School faculty and are regarded as professors, although not full-time or tenure-track. The title of Senior Lecturer is distinct from the title of Lecturer, which signifies adjunct status. Like Obama, each of the Law School’s Senior Lecturers have high-demand careers in politics or public service, which prevent full-time teaching. Several times during his 12 years as a professor in the Law School, Obama was invited to join the faculty in a full-time tenure-track position, but he declined.

http://www.factcheck.org/2008/03/obama-a-constitutional-law-professor/

[Guest]

[QUOTE=Guest;539469]I have to control myself from:1rotfl::1rotfl::1rotfl: when I hear some of you talk about what jobs Ryan did not have before being elected to congress. Let's just say, to be polite (I am working at it) that he certainly is no worse in that regard than Obama was. Nobody could ever state what "real job" Obama ever has."
__________________________________________________ _

From 1992 until his election to the U.S. Senate in 2004, Barack Obama served as a professor in the Law School. He was a Lecturer from 1992 to 1996. He was a Senior Lecturer from 1996 to 2004, during which time he taught three courses per year. Senior Lecturers are considered to be members of the Law School faculty and are regarded as professors, although not full-time or tenure-track. The title of Senior Lecturer is distinct from the title of Lecturer, which signifies adjunct status. Like Obama, each of the Law School’s Senior Lecturers have high-demand careers in politics or public service, which prevent full-time teaching. Several times during his 12 years as a professor in the Law School, Obama was invited to join the faculty in a full-time tenure-track position, but he declined.

First your cut and paste job is not credited and that is required per US law.

Second, he served in the ILL senate from 1997 until 2004 thus whereever you copied it from is really bogus !

PS....see you modified it to add the credit but it is still inaccurate !

[Guest]

OK so he won elections in politics and intellectual positions...still waiting to hear about Obama's real job...

btk

[Guest]

[quote=buggyone;539822]

First your cut and paste job is not credited and that is required per US law.

Second, he served in the ILL senate from 1997 until 2004 thus whereever you copied it from is really bogus !

Thank you for the reminder to cite the work. I put it in the post at your suggestion. If you re-read the statement from the University of Chicago, it clears up your second point. I will re-copy it for you and it has the same citation as above.

"Like Obama, each of the Law School’s Senior Lecturers have high-demand careers in politics or public service, which prevent full-time teaching."

[Guest]

[quote=Bucco;539829]

Thank you for the reminder to cite the work. I put it in the post at your suggestion. If you re-read the statement from the University of Chicago, it clears up your second point. I will re-copy it for you and it has the same citation as above.

"Like Obama, each of the Law School’s Senior Lecturers have high-demand careers in politics or public service, which prevent full-time teaching."

I believe his career in the senate in ILL is important and should be cited as often as possible

[Guest]

OK so he won elections in politics and intellectual positions...still waiting to hear about Obama's real job...

btk

You do not call a Professor of Law at University of Chicago from 1992 until 2004 a real job? What did you do for those same 12 years?

[Guest]

You do not call a Professor of Law at University of Chicago from 1992 until 2004 a real job? What did you do for those same 12 years?

He was a ILL senator and if you read his autobiography or anything about him at all, you would find he was an extremely active politician in those years.

[Guest]

He was a ILL senator and if you read his autobiography or anything about him at all, you would find he was an extremely active politician in those years.

Very busy man and extremely competent as well.

If you do not believe FactCheck.org, that is up to you.

[Guest]

Very busy man and extremely competent as well.

If you do not believe FactCheck.org, that is up to you.

Never been to that site and do not intend to visit ! I prefer my own research....did they mention all his ABSENT votes ? Did they mention how and where he launched his campaign ?

[Guest]

Never been to that site and do not intend to visit ! I prefer my own research....did they mention all his ABSENT votes ? Did they mention how and where he launched his campaign ?






What rubbish you poste !!!!!!!!!! Why waste bandwidth?

Obama is President of the United States - he signed ACA into law. It is on his watch that we got Bin Laden. He has already accomplished more in 3.5 years that the guy before him did in eight. Signing ACA and getting Bin Laden already makes him a far more successful POTUS that the guy before him.

He is running for reelection and every poll (including Fox) shows he has a commanding lead.

There is nothing in the Constitution that says he must have a previous job that meets Bucco's satisfaction.

[Guest]

What rubbish you poste !!!!!!!!!! Why waste bandwidth?

Obama is President of the United States - he signed ACA into law. It is on his watch that we got Bin Laden. He has already accomplished more in 3.5 years that the guy before him did in eight. Signing ACA and getting Bin Laden already makes him a far more successful POTUS that the guy before him.

He is running for reelection and every poll (including Fox) shows he has a commanding lead.

There is nothing in the Constitution that says he must have a previous job that meets Bucco's satisfaction.


I am sorry....I was correcting the biography that was submitted incorrectly and I have no idea whatsoever what your post has to do with what was being discussed.

BUGGYONE brought up his biography and qualifications, not me....perhaps you should talk to him !!

And yes signing the ACA into law puts us into a new era of spending !!

[Guest]

You do not call a Professor of Law at University of Chicago from 1992 until 2004 a real job? What did you do for those same 12 years?

President Obama's work experience could never hold a candle to Congressman Paul Ryan's experience driving the 'Weinermobile'.

[Guest]

President Obama's work experience could never hold a candle to Congressman Paul Ryan's experience driving the 'Weinermobile'.

BRILLIANT...NOW lets talk about Jobs, the economy, leadership required.....the character assassination is getting pretty old, at least for me !

[Guest]

Oh, I hope the conservatives get used to the character attacks on Paul Ryan. This is only the 4th day of him being the VP nominee. Lots more days and lots more character attacks will be coming.

Thinking Americans will see that Rep. Ryan was not the best choice for Romney to pick.

[Guest]

Oh, I hope the conservatives get used to the character attacks on Paul Ryan. This is only the 4th day of him being the VP nominee. Lots more days and lots more character attacks will be coming.

Thinking Americans will see that Rep. Ryan was not the best choice for Romney to pick.

WOW...you folks are so hung up on attacking people....okay..will play for a bit....I assume you read what Clinton's chief of staff said about him, and I aslo suppose you noticed the dramatic change in this mornings polls !

You folks do so enjoy going after people instead of discussing issues...must be some kind of fun in that I suppose...like People Magazine or something..........

You specifically say CHARACTER attacks....I find that very interesting and shallow ! Other words can be subbed for shallow !

[Guest]

dramatic change in the polls? how about posting the link?


One warning sign for the Romney campaign: By a margin of 44 percent to 29 percent, voters said the incumbent vice president, Joe Biden, was more qualified than Ryan to serve as president if the need arose.

[Guest]

dramatic change in the polls? how about posting the link?


One warning sign for the Romney campaign: By a margin of 44 percent to 29 percent, voters said the incumbent vice president, Joe Biden, was more qualified than Ryan to serve as president if the need arose.

Not big on polls at this time of the year but my fault for mentioning it....the only one that I THINK is out yet this morning..

" The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 50% of Likely U.S. Voters now have a favorable opinion of Ryan, while 32% view him unfavorably. This includes 29% with a Very Favorable view of Romney’s vice presidential pick and 13% with a Very Unfavorable one. Only 13% are now unfamiliar with Ryan, and five percent (5%) are not sure about him. (To see survey question wording, click here.)

Just Prior to being picked as Romney’s running mate, only 39% viewed Ryan favorably, while 25% held an unfavorable opinion of him.

Forty-three percent (43%) of voters think Romney made the right choice when he chose Ryan to be his running mate. Twenty-two percent (22%) disagree and think it was a bad choice. A sizable 35% aren’t sure.

But 36% now say they are more likely to vote for Romney with Ryan as his running mate. Twenty-nine percent (29%) say they are less likely to vote for the Republican, while just as many (30%) say the vice presidential selection has no impact on their vote. "

50% Now View Paul Ryan Favorably; 43% Say He Was Right Choice - Rasmussen Reports™ (http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2012/election_2012_presidential_election/august_2012/50_now_view_paul_ryan_favorably_43_say_he_was_righ t_choice)

I brought this up with my stupid comment but I sure hope we do not get a rush of these whether Ryan, Obama, or Romeny go up and down....it is an exercise in plain dumbness !

[Guest]

According to The New Republic - "Rasmussen polling occupies an odd place in the political culture. In the conservative world, it is the gold standard. If you go to a conservative set on basically any random day, you'll see somebody touting a Rasmussen poll."

Keep quoting those Rasmussen polls until the cows come home - but they mean absolutely nothing when you consider the source.

[Guest]

According to The New Republic - "Rasmussen polling occupies an odd place in the political culture. In the conservative world, it is the gold standard. If you go to a conservative set on basically any random day, you'll see somebody touting a Rasmussen poll."

Keep quoting those Rasmussen polls until the cows come home - but they mean absolutely nothing when you consider the source.

Good for you...now go dig up some more dirt on someone !! THAT is the mission, isnt it ?

:)

[Guest]

the mission is obvious by consistent absence of ANY discussion on major issues of interest to Americans...like the economy, jobs and energy independence.

In addition they will not answer ANY question related to these topics either.

They are committed to character assassination of Ryan, which is not working. They are committed to the where are the tax return distractions.

How about an Obama supporter, instead of always carping about what you don't like about ANY opposition candidate, issue or opinion......on any comparable subject you chastise the opposition for, how about telling us what those you support have to offer....ON THE SAME SUBJECT?

Yes you will most likely have to break ranks with the dispensed partisan marching orders....but just try to see if you can represent your candidate/party....ON THE SAME ISSUE you are required to attack.

btk

[Guest]

the mission is obvious by consistent absence of ANY discussion on major issues of interest to Americans...like the economy, jobs and energy independence.

In addition they will not answer ANY question related to these topics either.

They are committed to character assassination of Ryan, which is not working. They are committed to the where are the tax return distractions.

How about an Obama supporter, instead of always carping about what you don't like about ANY opposition candidate, issue or opinion......on any comparable subject you chastise the opposition for, how about telling us what those you support have to offer....ON THE SAME SUBJECT?

Yes you will most likely have to break ranks with the dispensed partisan marching orders....but just try to see if you can represent your candidate/party....ON THE SAME ISSUE you are required to attack.

btk







Here is a MAJOR issue of the day.

When will Willard release his tax returns? So far, all he has released is a partial return of one year and an estimate of another year.

Can't trust a guy like that.

[Guest]

Here is a MAJOR issue of the day.

When will Willard release his tax returns? So far, all he has released is a partial return of one year and an estimate of another year.

Can't trust a guy like that.

If that is your major issue and not putting people back to work, or solving our intense debt crisis, etc. then so be it. Enjoy !!

[Guest]

If that is your major issue and not putting people back to work, or solving our intense debt crisis, etc. then so be it. Enjoy !!

Remember the quotes I posted from Mein Kampf and Joseph Goebbels. Over and over, and if you repeat it often enough..................

They try hard, don't they?

[Guest]

Remember the quotes I posted from Mein Kampf and Joseph Goebbels. Over and over, and if you repeat it often enough..................

They try hard, don't they?

It makes no sense to me. They either just want to ignore real issues, dont know what they are, or dont care. All of those options are a bit scary !

Will say one thing...they do not embarass easily, not matter how many times you show them they are flat out wrong with FACTS, they just keep pushing to destroy another human being and then call everyone else non feeling

[Guest]

I said over and over and over again.....this dance is gonna be a drag.

[Guest]

Here is a MAJOR issue of the day.

When will Willard release his tax returns? So far, all he has released is a partial return of one year and an estimate of another year.

Can't trust a guy like that.

The more important question is when will Hussein release his application to Occidental College, Columbia and Harvard as well as his transcripts and papers from these universities? You certainly cannot trust that guy!

[Guest]

The more important question is when will Hussein release his application to Occidental College, Columbia and Harvard as well as his transcripts and papers from these universities? You certainly cannot trust that guy!

You mean the college records that will show that he attended on scholarships for foreign students?