![]() |
Quote:
So, what happens if there is a mutation, in your body, that your immune system doesn't recognize? Well, it will not get killed. The problem is what happens next. I don't know. I am not an expert. But, think about this. Every year most (many?) people get influenza vaccinations. So, why are we not all dead from mutated mega influenza viruses resulting from being vaccinated? Every year millions of children get vaccinated against various viruses. Why aren't we all dead from polio, chickenpox, etc. as a result of a mega monster mutating because of the vaccinations? So, who do we believe, a Vet that says our entire immune system has been destroyed if we got vaccinated (which means EVERYONE that has been vaccinated will soon be DEAD - you can't live without an immune system outside of a sterile bubble). Or scientists that have worked their entire lives in this field, and have minor achievements like eradicating polio, chickenpox, measle, et al. Inquiring minds want to know... |
Quote:
Actually, no maybes about it. Those are actual reasons why. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
So thank God, even with all the whiners that say the government can't make me do it... The people/business's have spoken...you do the right thing....or get out.....FINALLY!!!! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
You don't know me to paint me with such a broad brush. |
Quote:
There are 13 documented occurrences of this on various other viruses. They used a polybasic furin cleavage site with a proline, two arginines and an Alanine. PRRA. PRRA has high affinity for human tissues which is why it is a good insert for gain of function. PRRA is not found in animal models like bats, pangolins or most of everything that isn't humanized because their systems don't code for a protease like humans do. There are no bat ancestor genomes with a polybasic furin cleavage site with PRRA. In fact, that probably would not occur in nature because it would make it harder for the virus to propagate in bat tissues. Sars-Cov2 has a polybasic furin cleavage site PRRA. Is that proof it came from a lab? without someone admitting they did that, no, not exactly. It's a smoking gun though. It is the exact sequence used in gain of function. We know bat genomes were used at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. We know the Bat lady, Shi was using that exact sequence in gain of function research. When you are in North America and you hear hoofbeats, you don't think zebras. |
Quote:
All this new study has done is create more uncertainty, confusion and distrust. Now the unvaccinated think, "why bother getting vaccinated if my old auntie is fully vaxxed and still got it anyway?" |
Quote:
But, just my opinion, and you are right I don't know you at all, so I can only speak to what I read here. You could be the most positive upbeat person in TV as far as I know. |
Quote:
I will still trust the experts that actually work in the field of pandemics (on humans) over some stranger on the internet that says every one of the experts is wrong. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:28 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by
DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.