Talk of The Villages Florida

Talk of The Villages Florida (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/)
-   Current Events and News (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/current-events-news-541/)
-   -   Cop Shoots Man in Atlanta (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/current-events-news-541/cop-shoots-man-atlanta-307749/)

Dr Winston O Boogie jr 06-15-2020 06:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LoisR (Post 1784451)
Watch it again. The car was already stopped and parked with the man sleeping in it. No law was broken. The man passed the sobriety test and offered to walk to his sister's house down the street. No law was broken. The police then tried to arrest him. For what charge? Sleeping in ones own car after having a few drinks? Interesting how we see the same events differently. Justice for all.

You didn't see the beginning of the video. Police received a 911 call that a man had fallen asleep in his car in the Wendy's drive through lane. When the first officer arrived, he bangs on the window to wake the man. The man then drove the car over to the parking space and fell asleep again. The officer woke him again. That's where you saw the video begin.

He was in line at the drive up window so it has to be assumed that he drove the car there. Then he drove it to the parking space and actually ran it up onto the barrier before it backed down.

When the officer woke him for the second time, he didn't remember being in the drive through line. He was obviously on something and obviously drove the car.

Dr Winston O Boogie jr 06-15-2020 06:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tim Ringler (Post 1784439)
Better read it again. You missed a lot important facts. There was no need for this.

You'd better watch all of the available videos. This was a completely justifiable shooting.

Here are the facts as I know them to be. If I'm missing anything, please let me know.

The police received a 911 call that a man had fallen asleep in his car in the Wendy's drive through line.

An officer arrived at the scene and found he man asleep and woke him.

The man then drove the car to a parking space where he went up onto the curb and back down.

The officer had to wake the man again.

The man had trouble communicating and finding his license and the officer noted the strong smell of alcohol.

The officer called for a breathalyzer qualified officer.

The breathalyzer officer arrived and began asking questions. Mr Brook gave conflicting answers to the same questions. He did not remember being in the drive through line or driving his car to the parking space.

The officer, with the permission of Mr Brooks administered a breathalyzer test and found that Mr Brooks was to incapacitated to drive and asked him to put his hands behind his back. As the officer was attempting to handcuff him, Mr Brooks began a scuffle with the officer and they both fell to the ground. Mr Brooks then grabbed the officer's taser and proceeded to run. the officer pursued. After a short pursuit, Mr Brooks turned and fired the taser at the officer and the officer returned fire hitting Mr Brooks.

Please tell me what I missed and how the officer might have handled this differently.

MEbner2805 06-15-2020 06:13 PM

I don’t feel that was a justified killing. I think shoot the perp in the leg to stop them but not in the body! I feel cops don’t realize the damage a bullet does to a body. Criminals are terrible but cops must handle them properly and stop shooting them for simple disrespect! That’s the reason cops are shooting people and it’s not acceptable.

Dr Winston O Boogie jr 06-15-2020 06:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimjamuser (Post 1784771)
A drunken, frighted poor sheep that was not treated like a Christian. Would Jesus have shot?

I don't know how much of the video you watched, but the police were very polite and treated Mr Brooks with the utmost care and respect prior to him assaulting the officer, stealing his taser and firing it at him.

In fact, Mr Brooks was very respectful and cooperative until the officer attempted to handcuff him.

ColdNoMore 06-15-2020 06:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TooColdNJ (Post 1784862)
Shameful? That you feel the officers in these situations should be given the benefit of the doubt when their lives were not in danger.

The deceased should not be deceased.

Read a state trooper’s take on this, as a law enforcement officer, somewhere in this thread. If you think all police, all doctors, all teachers, all nurses, etc. should be given the benefit of the doubt as well, I don’t agree. We should trust these professionals based on their duties to society, but it’s a bit narrow-minded if you don’t believe there are a few bad apples in any bunch, as was just proven, but we should give them all the benefit of the doubt because they’re police officers! It’s situational; a man was kneed in the throat and died as a result. The other one was shot—while the officers’ lives weren’t in any danger. They were chasing the guy- they weren’t being chased. You may have the opinion that the scum of the earth may be always be so, but it’s wrong to believe that they should have been killed.., especially for their past criminal activity, and especially if they served time for those crimes. Every criminal is NOT WORTHLESS; some can be rehabilitated. If there are other options- which there clearly were, they should not have killed him. No one has the time to stop everything and look into their entire criminal background. What if they weren’t criminals?

In the recent killings, although having criminal backgrounds, they weren’t committing a murder, rape, armed robbery.... or assault with a deadly weapon. There were no warrants out for their rests because of those violent crimes, either.

They weren’t even carrying guns. They didn’t deserve to die as they did. The officers were in no immediate danger.

All excellent points, but unfortunately the actual underlying issues of why this keeps happening... are primarily twofold.

1. The police unions are so powerful, that prosecutors are leery to even bring up charges against LEO's...because of the likelihood their prosecution will be unsuccessful.

2. The reason the prosecutors have the deck stacked against them is for a number of reasons, but you can bet every single cop knows that they are almost untouchable from criminal prosecution...or even being permanently terminated.

The laws basically allow them to be... "bubble-wrapped" (yeah, I borrowed that term :D)


Difficulty in prosecuting bad cops (click here)

Quote:

It is rare, and extremely difficult, to convict a law enforcement officer after a fatal shooting, according to criminal justice experts who spoke to NBC News on Monday.

For legal scholars and criminologists who study law enforcement, those outcomes are not exactly surprising.

Cops are held to a different standard.

The law, generally speaking, is on the side of the cops, who have wide latitude when it comes to using force, according to David A. Harris, a professor at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law who teaches in police behavior.

"For better or worse, whether you believe in it or not, [the law] (*Note-the SCOTUS ruling just today, 6/15/20, of refusing to revisit the the "qualified immunity" standard for police...reinforces this). is very favorable to police use of force," Harris said. "That objective standard is very wide in terms of giving police discretion."



And you can bet your last dollar, those facts are in the back of every single cop's mind and especially with the 1% of bad ones...and/or of those (a much higher %) who emotionally have no business being in law enforcement. :ohdear:

I mean cripes, who in the world can watch the Rodney King over-the-top and totally unwarranted beating (given that he was certainly no threat)...and not shake their heads at how those involved got away with it?

If you watch any documentary of King's case, it quickly becomes evident that a change of venue to a much more receptive jury pool...was the foundation of the outcome.

And then we get the miscarriage of justice with OJ, which those same documentaries basically call 'payback' for Rodney King.

NEITHER of those cases...received true justice.

If the unions (which also includes teachers) did more to police their own people, a LOT of the problems we're seeing now...would go away.

And this is NOT a general "anti-union rant," because in a lot of cases unions actually protect the employees...from abusive supervisors/employers.

MEbner2805 06-15-2020 06:31 PM

WoW so nice to get a real experienced viewpoint on this and thank you a bunch for chiming in to educate us all! The cop clearly should have handled it differently and it’s a shame too many of them are seemingly shooting out of feeling disrespected. I wonder about the training program if the cops are operating off emotion all the time like this and destroying their lives and others who don’t deserve to die?
Much respect and god bless all our police forces for what they go through.

anothersteve 06-15-2020 06:34 PM

In this case, in my opinion, it was justified, and anyone that thinks it was racial needs to do some serious soul searching. I watched the video many many many times.
Nothing I say will change anyone's mind who feels differently. So..............................................
That's all I have to say about that.
Steve

ColdNoMore 06-15-2020 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr Winston O Boogie jr (Post 1784897)
I don't know how much of the video you watched, but the police were very polite and treated Mr Brooks with the utmost care and respect prior to him assaulting the officer, stealing his taser and firing it at him.

In fact, Mr Brooks was very respectful and cooperative until the officer attempted to handcuff him.

How about we level the playing field and local police start making folks at the square, sitting in their golf carts, blow into a breathalyzer, start handcuffing them...and hauling them off to jail?

And if they resist, in any fashion and start running away?

Just shoot them in the back...and kill them.

After all, obviously some folks think being over the limit, tussling with a cop and then running...should carry a death sentence.

Let's see how fast and magically minds are changed...if that were to start happening.
:ho:

anothersteve 06-15-2020 06:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ColdNoMore (Post 1784910)
tussling with a cop and then running...
[/SIZE]:ho:

"tussling" with a cop
Too funny!
What footage were you watching?

ColdNoMore 06-15-2020 06:49 PM

Rumor has it that more info regarding the officers involved...will soon be forthcoming.


Should be interesting.
:popcorn:

Scorpyo 06-15-2020 07:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by retiredguy123 (Post 1784800)

How dare you bore us with facts, logic and truth. After all, who do you believe the media or your lying eyes?

ColdNoMore 06-15-2020 07:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr Winston O Boogie jr (Post 1784894)
You'd better watch all of the available videos. This was a completely justifiable shooting.

Here are the facts as I know them to be. If I'm missing anything, please let me know.

The police received a 911 call that a man had fallen asleep in his car in the Wendy's drive through line.

An officer arrived at the scene and found he man asleep and woke him.

The man then drove the car to a parking space where he went up onto the curb and back down.

The officer had to wake the man again.

The man had trouble communicating and finding his license
and the officer noted the strong smell of alcohol.

The officer called for a breathalyzer qualified officer.

The breathalyzer officer arrived and began asking questions. Mr Brook gave conflicting answers to the same questions. He did not remember being in the drive through line or driving his car to the parking space.

The officer, with the permission of Mr Brooks administered a breathalyzer test and found that Mr Brooks was to incapacitated to drive and asked him to put his hands behind his back. As the officer was attempting to handcuff him, Mr Brooks began a scuffle with the officer and they both fell to the ground. Mr Brooks then grabbed the officer's taser and proceeded to run. the officer pursued. After a short pursuit, Mr Brooks turned and fired the taser at the officer and the officer returned fire hitting Mr Brooks.

Please tell me what I missed and how the officer might have handled this differently
.

OK...I can do that.. :D

1. Why did they allow him to drive the car over to park it?

2. Where are the videos showing...


Quote:

-The man then drove the car to a parking space where he went up onto the curb and back down.

-The officer had to wake the man again.

-The man had trouble communicating and finding his license...

...those things happening, in that order?

And since they had his drivers license AND his car, plus he was running away...where is the justification for killing him? :oops:

I'm not claiming that I've seen everything there is to see, but I haven't personally seen anything...proving that you are correct in your timeline and assertions.

kathy1516 06-15-2020 07:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TomPerrett (Post 1784733)
Even in the old western movies it was unlawfully to shoot a man in the back while he’s running away. Bottom line.

Every time A black person get unlawfully killed. There are riots. Solution : stop killing people in the streets just because you can.

When I was young Policemen were peace officers today they are a kick ass and take names squad. And there were thugs and gangs back then as well. There was also a lot of organized crime families all across the country. On top of that there were Motorcycle gangs just getting started and they run rampant over civilians trying to establish their culture.

I’m sure there are Exceptions but in these last several black people killings In recent memory none of these people were armed. Furthermore there were always several policeman at the scene when these assaults the place. You would think but several trained policeman Could easily contain any one person.
Something is really wrong in this picture !

So it would have been better to let him tase the police officer and give him the opportunity to take his gun and shoot him? No thanks. He did the right thing. Moral of the story: when a police officer arrests you and tells you to stop....stop!!! Color has nothing to do with it!!!

Scorpyo 06-15-2020 07:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by anothersteve (Post 1784914)
"tussling" with a cop
Too funny!
What footage were you watching?

You found that funny? I found the part about "running away" way funnier. The visual in my head cracks me up. Maybe I'm wrong and you have a different definition of running. Taking 5 minutes to go 50 feet, with 2 breaks in between, in my opinion, is not running.:1rotfl: I can go at least 100 feet in 5 minutes with only 1 break. Now that's running!

anothersteve 06-15-2020 07:31 PM

The perp shot the taser twice if anyone cares to watch the video. First shot shows intent to incapacitate an officer, before he ran. Second time is when he fires back at the other officer, again intent. My educated and informative guess is, by the color of the tasers, they were using the two shot X2. The shoot was justified. There will be a lot more on this if people would do some in depth research, instead of just being talking heads.
Steve


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:09 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.