Dr Winston O Boogie jr |
06-15-2020 05:03 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColdNoMore
(Post 1784339)
The suspect should not have resisted arrest for being .02 above the limit...but it shouldn't have been a death sentence.
The cop should not have shot someone in the back, while he was running away... when the cop's life was in no danger.
And NO, a taser is not considered a lethal weapon.
Why was the cop picking up his brass for 2 minutes...before he even went to the victim?
Maybe because he knew once the detectives figured out how far away the victim was, while running away...he would be in deep doo-doo?
And NO, this is NOT justification for citizen violence or property damage.
It (along with the posts we'll see here) does, however, show...exactly why black people across the nation are so angry.
|
Let me correct a few things in this post. He was was running away but was not shot in the back. During the pursuit, the man turned and fired the taser at the officer. The officer returned fire.
The taser is not a lethal weapon and if this man didn't steal the officer's taser the officer would have been able to use it instead of his gun.
Officers are trained that if someone has a taser or stun gun that they are to shoot. This is because if they are tased or stunned, they are rendered helpless and the perpetrator can then take their gun and shoot them.
A taser, by the way, can be used as a stun gun once the taser cartridge has been expelled.
I have no idea why the officer was picking up brass or that he actually was. I didn't see that. If he was it would no bearing on the case. He shot three times. There is no disputing that so where the brass laid would have nothing to do with this case.
This is easily a justified shooting. Unfortunately, it comes on the heels of what is apparently an unjustified homicide of a black man that is all over the news and has created a toxic political environment.
|