![]() |
Quote:
|
He chose to lie. He chose to go to trial. He was found guilty by a jury of his peers. I don't understand the complaint.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
More population; more crime. True anywhere.
|
Quote:
|
If an appeal is in the works, he definitely needs a new and better lawyer.
|
So glad see nothing political in these posts.
|
He committed felony perjury. Nothing to do about donuts.
|
Let him without sin throw....
Sounds like a senior citizen in over his head about both his job responsibilities and skills set he needed for them. How about a sincere mea culpa, and some forgiveness from us will catch a mansions ear in tallahassee.
|
The punishment hardly fit the crime.
If the sun had its way he would be public enemy number one. In other words if the developer doesn't get his way one way he will get it another. Remind me never to run for public office. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
BS
Quote:
|
Quote:
It failed |
It is my experience that when you get yourself in a hole, quit digging! That was the real crime here. I doubt he will receive any time. He has already been punished.
|
It was not this crime was difficult to solve. Step #1 in determining if there was collaboration was to pull the phone records. Using one of the 50 or so phone apps such as Telegram or Signal would have eliminated those records.
They either didn't think they were really breaking the law, didn't think it was that serious of a law, or thought they were above the law. According to the phone records, some calls were seconds....so could have been about donuts. Many other calls were 10 minutes. Both individuals were offered an immunity deal, and only one took it. |
Quote:
Answer to original post….we are safer from corrupt politicians. |
Go against the Developer and they will bury you. Few of us are any match for their power, money, and influence. We don't stand a chance.
|
Quote:
|
Ohiobuckeye
Well we don’t live in TV anymore but if we or anywhere else, I wouldn’t hang out with him or be his buddy. He the kind of person that I wouldn’t want him around us senior citizens. I don’t know could TV’s legally not allow him & his wife to live their as long as he did’t do anything wrong. We don’t know if any of the millions of illegals have a prison record!
|
Oren Miller secretly talking
Isn't talking secretly what politicians do? Isn't that also what people who influence politicians also do? Of course, oaths have no meaning if an oath to tell the truth can be ignored with impunity, but how can one prove that an alleged liar has not simply misremembered, a failure of many of us in The Villages?
Then there is the elephant in the room. Why is a commonplace secret political conversation of such importance that it deserves a court case? Who benefits? Is Justice truly being served? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
All he had to do was say, “Yeah, we made some phone calls. Sorry. Won’t happen again.” He would have been fined a couple hundred $$ and probably still be a commissioner. That’s how it has worked for many who have “inadvertently” compromised the Sunshine Laws in Florida. |
I think the message is crystal clear.
|
Quote:
|
The B.A.R. (british accredited registry)-who controls the judges and esq. They are loyal to the crown not we the people. Maritime law, common law. 2 constitutions, military law etc. It is all against us modern day slaves. SIR-slave I remain. Research research research.
|
Quote:
|
I agree, he should have admitted he was wrong and I’ve wouldn’t be in jail, and grandpas shouldn’t lie.
|
He should have had council when he was interviewed under oath. I am assuming he didn't because I find it hard to believe any competent council would have allowed him to answer a question if he had any doubts about whether it was true. Alternatively, he should have not answered any questions. Hindsight, as they say, is 20/20.
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Or hunter B just to keep this politically neutral.
|
Quote:
The other view would be that a lifelong member of one party switched for the sole purpose of getting elected, and then pursued an anti-"company" agenda in a company town, violated the state Sunshine statutes, then committed perjury and worst of all got caught. Now people want to look the other way???? I thought we were a nation of laws. |
He’s in jail for the (crimes) he committed. Hopefully he will learn from this and be a better person when he gets out.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
The man knowingly broke the law, then lied about it. Laws are for all and are to be upheld. Surely some of these posters are not suggesting that because he's a nice guy he should be allowed to break the law. He knew what he was doing was illegal, he had been warned and continued breaking the law anyway. He was caught, he tried to lie his way out of it and then admitted it. He is a criminal, he was convicted by a jury. He broke the law and was caught. Yes, as some pointed out, many break the law, that is true, they are still criminals, they just haven't been caught yet.
He broke the law, he was caught breaking the law, he was convicted of breaking the law, that's how it works. Nice guy or not. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:19 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by
DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.