![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Where are you getting your information from? certainly not from Our governor DeSantis, you are wrong very very wrong over inflated. Signed,
Concerned |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
2. Either only 300K of the 600K can be directly attributed to covid or only 300K of the 600K actually ever existed. In the former case, the other 300K died of something, so what was it? In the latter case, the other 300K never existed and never died and the states, the CDC, the WaPo, the NYT, the CovidTrackingProject, and many other sources are lying to us. There is too much consistency in the 600K number to believe those people never really existed. |
Quote:
|
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
information from Global Research, a Canadian website run by the Centre for Research on Globalization, which was accused by NATO of posting conspiracy theories, spreading Russian disinformation and undermining Western media. The post specifically looks at vaccines from Pfizer/BioNTech, Moderna and AstraZeneca, offering a breakdown of the different injuries and deaths purportedly associated with each vaccine using numbers from a European Union-maintained database called EudraVigilance. The implication is the COVID-19 vaccines are harmful and could result in injury or death. However, the numbers are taken out of context to exaggerate the risk of vaccines. The EudraVigilance database itself cautions the information it collects is for "suspected side effects ... but which are not necessarily related to our caused by the medicine." "Information on suspected side effects should not be interpreted as meaning that the medicine or the active substance causes the observed effect or is unsafe to use," EudraVigilance’s website says. "Only a detailed evaluation and scientific assessment of all available data allows for robust conclusions to be drawn on the benefits and risks of a medicine." Taking the raw data of possible COVID-19 vaccination reactions at face value and using them without context is an oft-used tactic by people attempting to undermine public confidence in the vaccines, according to the New York Times. They frequently interpret the numbers from EudraVigilance or from its United States counterpart, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, as evidence of the vaccines’ dangers.: |
Quote:
The link takes you to the OPENVAERS website which performs pulls and summarizes the data. The website shows 11,904 deaths which is much higher than expected. Took some time to track that down and match it to the VAERS date. The OPENVAERS website is showing deaths from the entire world, not just the US (about 5,600 reported). Putting aside the significant correlation/causation question, *IF* these could be attributed to the vaccine then: 11,904 deaths out of 4.32B doses gives a vaccine death rate of 0.000276% 4,262,000 deaths out of 201,000,000 cases gives a covid death rate of 2.12% You are 7,700 times more likely to die from covid than from being vaccinated. |
Quote:
|
Thank you for your post and sending healing for your brother
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:11 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by
DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.