Do you know his "lack of tears" proves anything? No...I didn't think so...

It' wasn't an "assault rifle". He didn't transport it to another state...

He live right over the border, in Ohio, only 15 minutes away and he worked in Kenosha, daily. His father lived there... So just give up on the "crossing state lines" BS narrative already...

He was actively asking people if they "needed medical assistance". It's on video.

He threatened no one with his rifle. He passed countless others who completely ignored him. It's on video.

It wasn't until the child rapist, Rosenbaum, decided to attack him that things went sideways...

I was in law enforcement.....When someone who is not a trained like and actor fakes crying they cannot produce tears. Producing tears based on emotion is an involuntary response. Its one of the first thing we look for. Now you know...:welcome:

Brain cells
 

Yup after 12 surgeries with anesthesia my brain cells are rusting. I can’t see the the importance of all these posts when NO ONE IS AGHAST THAT AN 18 YEAR OLD GOES OUT FOR AN EVENING TOTING AN
AK47? Oh right, gun rights and all that crap.

Sure... if you say so... :ohdear:

Funny, the career cops I've talked to all believed him... So there's that...

Well, he didn't have an AK-47, so there's that...

It’s amazing how many people are
experts on court proceedings and
know when someone is crying or not . Thankfully he has a jury to decide his fate .

I wonder how many posters know the proud boys are an inclusive group, not racists, with black and Asian members. I wonder what the boy's POSSIBLE personal opinions have to do with the facts of the case.

I wonder what most posters would do if someone pointed a gun at them and they feared for their lives....

Obviously, you have no clue, but that is understandable. Many of us in The Villages are CCW. Many of us would become involved in a crisis. Not ALL of us, of course. That is proof by some of the very few comments on here that have no clue. Whether or not he had any business in the area, is no one's business. He said he was there, and there was video evidence and witnesses, that concluded that he was offering assistance. He put at least one fire out and he offered first aid assistance to the wounded. So, building are being burnt down by arsonists and folks are being assaulted, and he had a weapon for self defense. If he did not, I would think that he was a foolish nut, even though a decent guy for trying to help the community. He had a gun, wow! Most of the residents in The Villages have at least one gun. How wrong some folks are that jump to the conclusion that three scumbags are shot and the guy that did it was a bad guy. Sometimes bad guys get what they deserve. In this case, only two of them really got what they deserved. The third one got a second chance to right his own actions.

Pretty bad when a person is running for his life is prosecuted for defending himself.

"Poor decisions?" Hmmm, I wonder what some on here would do if confronted with the same situation. I probably would have approached the situation a bit more cautiously, but I would probably be on trial for THREE deaths instead of just two. I've had more experience over the years with firearms, I'm sure. I doubt I would have been able to attempt to outrun the crowd, so I would have had to make a fast decision as to what I would have to do to protect myself. "Poor decision?"

And that makes him a "white supremacist?" SO, shooting three white guys is proof that he is a racist? I know of several racists in The Villages, but that does not make me a racist. Some folks just jump to conclusions based on what someone tells them, and others reason things out and do not condemn based on gossip and rumor.

You forget about the families of the deceased
 

You are forgetting those whose lives were lost. To you it is entertainment.....to the families and those that loved the people who died it is life altering. Have compassion.

Read up on them... Their families had nothing to do with them for years...

The two who died had a long violent past.

Sad, but true...

I was in law enforcement and the lack of tears means absolutely NOTHING. I have never seen ANYONE convicted in court because they were unable to cry. Maybe in your vast experience, you have? If so, perhaps you can share the specifics? I have seen folks cry when they were in court and still found guilty. And then they really cried. So, the moral of the story is that crying won't get you anywhere....:a040:

You mean it won't get me out of a ticket? Damn!