Talk of The Villages Florida

Talk of The Villages Florida (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/)
-   Current Events and News (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/current-events-news-541/)
-   -   Unfair Prosecution (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/current-events-news-541/unfair-prosecution-326969/)

xNYer 12-07-2021 06:20 PM

2 parent family
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by justjim (Post 2036595)
OP, with all due respect the prosecutor is doing her job with the evidence she has available. I might add evidence that we are not privy to. However, a person is assumed innocent until proven guilty. You make some valid points and entitled to your opinion. So many cases are decided by Social Media opinions without knowing all the facts and evidence in a case. The Court/Jury will decide in due time.

Somehow not being for a city and being from a two parent family absolves them of guilt.
We know what you really mean.

Number 10 GI 12-07-2021 06:48 PM

This country has a VIOLENCE problem and we need to figure out why and work on fixing that problem. You can ban guns, swords, bow and arrows, crossbows, knives, crowbars, hammers or any other tool used to kill but that won't stop the violence. Violent people will find a way to commit murder regardless of bans on any kind of weapon or possible weapon. Stop focusing on the tool and concentrate on the tool operator.

OrangeBlossomBaby 12-07-2021 07:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Number 10 GI (Post 2037653)
This country has a VIOLENCE problem and we need to figure out why and work on fixing that problem. You can ban guns, swords, bow and arrows, crossbows, knives, crowbars, hammers or any other tool used to kill but that won't stop the violence. Violent people will find a way to commit murder regardless of bans on any kind of weapon or possible weapon. Stop focusing on the tool and concentrate on the tool operator.

If you did that, you'd need to point a finger at the parents - and THEIR parents, who brought up parents who are so lousy at parenting their own kids.

That would mean - pointing the finger at the vast majority of Villagers, since they ARE those grandparents who raised the generation that raised the current crop of teenagers.

And we can't have that. So instead, we blame the schools. Or we blame the "system." Or we blame the government, or we blame too many gun restrictions, not enough gun restrictions...

The problem is with the generations that created this toxic environment that the younger generation is now stuck living in.

Accidental1 12-08-2021 06:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThirdOfFive (Post 2036826)
Interesting how times change.

Back in the day we used to bring our guns TO school. Gun safety was a class offered a couple of times a year, and consisted of both classroom teaching and instruction on a range near the school. It was nothing to see several kids during the time the class was offered bringing their guns on the school bus (cased, of course). Guns were stored in the principal's office until it was time to use them on the range but ammunition was usually carried loose in our pockets, and no one gave it a second thought.

Oh--and we carried knives too. No self-respecting lad back then would EVER have left the house without is trusty Barlow or Ka-bar. Useful in school especially if the pencil sharpener was on the fritz.

Interesting though...back then the three biggest behavior "problems" at school were chewing gum, running in the halls and surreptitiously passing notes in class.

What changed?

I wonder how the number of guns per capita has changed over time?

Lindsyburnsy 12-08-2021 08:15 AM

Sounds like model parents to me. A lot like Rittenhouse’s mother. Who thinks it’s good parenting by taking their underage kid across state lines with an AK15 that he illegally possessed. I’m sure her day in court will come too.
Quote:

Originally Posted by dewilson58 (Post 2036475)
Parents called to school & they refused to take him home, knowing he purchased (& had) a gun. Then the parents were on the run. :ohdear:


Lindsyburnsy 12-08-2021 08:18 AM

People hv not learned how to take responsibility for their own actions.
Quote:

Originally Posted by OrangeBlossomBaby (Post 2037667)
If you did that, you'd need to point a finger at the parents - and THEIR parents, who brought up parents who are so lousy at parenting their own kids.

That would mean - pointing the finger at the vast majority of Villagers, since they ARE those grandparents who raised the generation that raised the current crop of teenagers.

And we can't have that. So instead, we blame the schools. Or we blame the "system." Or we blame the government, or we blame too many gun restrictions, not enough gun restrictions...

The problem is with the generations that created this toxic environment that the younger generation is now stuck living in.


Lindsyburnsy 12-08-2021 08:26 AM

Certain news stations constantly spew unjustness, people trying to replace us, anger, anger, that works up negativism and rage, to boost ratings. You can’t cut down a tree without a saw. Free for all gun ownership is dangerous. QUOTE=Number 10 GI;2037653]This country has a VIOLENCE problem and we need to figure out why and work on fixing that problem. You can ban guns, swords, bow and arrows, crossbows, knives, crowbars, hammers or any other tool used to kill but that won't stop the violence. Violent people will find a way to commit murder regardless of bans on any kind of weapon or possible weapon. Stop focusing on the tool and concentrate on the tool operator.[/QUOTE]

MDLNB 12-08-2021 08:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OrangeBlossomBaby (Post 2037667)
If you did that, you'd need to point a finger at the parents - and THEIR parents, who brought up parents who are so lousy at parenting their own kids.

That would mean - pointing the finger at the vast majority of Villagers, since they ARE those grandparents who raised the generation that raised the current crop of teenagers.

And we can't have that. So instead, we blame the schools. Or we blame the "system." Or we blame the government, or we blame too many gun restrictions, not enough gun restrictions...

The problem is with the generations that created this toxic environment that the younger generation is now stuck living in.


Nope, not "the vast majority" of Villagers. I do agree that it is lenient parents that are the root cause. But, contributing to that is the hippy ideology taught in our public schools and lack of discipline. The radical brainwashing on TV programs doesn't help either. Violent games being allowed by parents at home, is not helpful.

ThirdOfFive 12-08-2021 08:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Accidental1 (Post 2037718)
I wonder how the number of guns per capita has changed over time?

I imagine that the number of guns have always been on the increase. The TOTAL number of guns in America is estimated by some pretty reliable sources as about half a billion, give or take a few hundred thousand either way. Per capita? pretty much the same, I would think, if you are looking at the population as a whole. But in my opinion gun ownership is not the same as owning, say, socks. Gun aficionados, in my opinion, may own multiple guns, while some of the more fervent anti-gunners avoid them like the plague.

OrangeBlossomBaby 12-08-2021 09:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MDLNB (Post 2037760)
Nope, not "the vast majority" of Villagers. I do agree that it is lenient parents that are the root cause. But, contributing to that is the hippy ideology taught in our public schools and lack of discipline. The radical brainwashing on TV programs doesn't help either. Violent games being allowed by parents at home, is not helpful.

You really need to learn more about the words you choose. "Hippy [sic] ideology" is the antithesis to what's going on here, and it's not being taught in schools. Or in the home, or even in churches, and certainly not politics.

The "peace love and crunchy granola" ideology has taken a back seat to "power at all costs" ideology.

The Hippie movement was rife with drugs, but mostly it was about peaceful protest and anti-war.

Bonnevie 12-08-2021 09:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Number 10 GI (Post 2037653)
This country has a VIOLENCE problem and we need to figure out why and work on fixing that problem. You can ban guns, swords, bow and arrows, crossbows, knives, crowbars, hammers or any other tool used to kill but that won't stop the violence. Violent people will find a way to commit murder regardless of bans on any kind of weapon or possible weapon. Stop focusing on the tool and concentrate on the tool operator.

that's the argument made after all these shootings. don't look at guns at the cause....but, then what do you propose to tackle the problem of keeping guns out of the hands of these people? are you at least advocating for more funds for school counselors so these kids can be helped before becoming violent?

OrangeBlossomBaby 12-08-2021 09:33 AM

It's interesting to see which members insist "it's not guns that kill people, it's people who kill people! Don't take away the guns!"

And the same people who also insist "It's the turn signals that create problems, not people driving incorrectly! Take away the turn signals!"


(disclosure: I'm all for 2A, and equally for restrictions on who may use them firearm -types- and proving qualifications for use (licensing). I'm also all for turn signals, and equally for restrictions on who may use golf carts and proving qualifications for use (licensing).

MDLNB 12-08-2021 01:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OrangeBlossomBaby (Post 2037789)
You really need to learn more about the words you choose. "Hippy [sic] ideology" is the antithesis to what's going on here, and it's not being taught in schools. Or in the home, or even in churches, and certainly not politics.

The "peace love and crunchy granola" ideology has taken a back seat to "power at all costs" ideology.

The Hippie movement was rife with drugs, but mostly it was about peaceful protest and anti-war.


A word substitution sometimes has to be used to prevent being punished/banned/sent to the penalty box. But, the term "hippy" was probably understood by most others on here, for what it was meant to convey. Sorry if it went over your head. Either you did not catch on to it or you took exception to it. Whatever.........

MDLNB 12-08-2021 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OrangeBlossomBaby (Post 2037797)
It's interesting to see which members insist "it's not guns that kill people, it's people who kill people! Don't take away the guns!"

And the same people who also insist "It's the turn signals that create problems, not people driving incorrectly! Take away the turn signals!"


(disclosure: I'm all for 2A, and equally for restrictions on who may use them firearm -types- and proving qualifications for use (licensing). I'm also all for turn signals, and equally for restrictions on who may use golf carts and proving qualifications for use (licensing).


Yes, there is a certain segment of folks that would regulate every aspect of life. There is NO need for more rules and regulations when the existing ones on the books are not enforced. STOP signs are not just for registered vehicles. The traffic signs are for ALL, including golf carts and bikes. Time to cast blame where it is....on the dummies that refuse to believe that rules apply to them. Driving is a privilege NOT a right. If one wishes to poke around in a golf cart, then they should understand how it operates and turn their signals off after making a turn. I do not condemn anyone for forgetting. Many folks, old and young forget when they are not automated turn signals. Even I have forgotten on an occasion. Seems to me that folks our age would have learned patience by now. The ONLY reason for being in a hurry is to get to the ER or beat the rush hour traffic heading for the Golden Corral so you can get in at the head of the supper line.

jimbomaybe 12-08-2021 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OrangeBlossomBaby (Post 2037789)
You really need to learn more about the words you choose. "Hippy [sic] ideology" is the antithesis to what's going on here, and it's not being taught in schools. Or in the home, or even in churches, and certainly not politics.

The "peace love and crunchy granola" ideology has taken a back seat to "power at all costs" ideology.

The Hippie movement was rife with drugs, but mostly it was about peaceful protest and anti-war.

As many times as I have disagreed with you are certainly right on this the "Hippy" is personified by peace , love, chill out bro, non violent, (of course the right drugs help a lot)

manaboutown 12-08-2021 02:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lindsyburnsy (Post 2037749)
Sounds like model parents to me. A lot like Rittenhouse’s mother. Who thinks it’s good parenting by taking their underage kid across state lines with an AK15 that he illegally possessed. I’m sure her day in court will come too.

This allegation is defamatory nonsense.These are not the facts which were brought out in the trial.

manaboutown 12-08-2021 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bonnevie (Post 2037793)
that's the argument made after all these shootings. don't look at guns at the cause....but, then what do you propose to tackle the problem of keeping guns out of the hands of these people? are you at least advocating for more funds for school counselors so these kids can be helped before becoming violent?

Looks like kids these days are violent with or without guns or other types of weapons. They can gang up on, for example a bus driver, and use their fists.

Chicago chaos: Public bus driver hospitalized after beaten on street, 21 juveniles arrested | Fox News

https://cwbchicago.com/2021/12/boy-s...nium-park.html

Number 10 GI 12-08-2021 03:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by manaboutown (Post 2037883)
Looks like kids these days are violent with or without guns or other types of weapons. They can gang up on, for example a bus driver, and use their fists.

Chicago chaos: Public bus driver hospitalized after beaten on street, 21 juveniles arrested | Fox News

https://cwbchicago.com/2021/12/boy-s...nium-park.html

Skate boards are being used quite often to assault someone and they can be a deadly weapon.

jimbomaybe 12-08-2021 03:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by manaboutown (Post 2037873)
This allegation is defamatory nonsense.These are not the facts which were brought out in the trial.

Why let facts get in the way of programed opinions ?

JMintzer 12-09-2021 08:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xNYer (Post 2037646)
Somehow not being for a city and being from a two parent family absolves them of guilt.
We know what you really mean.

We do?

Please enlighten us...

JMintzer 12-09-2021 08:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lindsyburnsy (Post 2037749)
Sounds like model parents to me. A lot like Rittenhouse’s mother. Who thinks it’s good parenting by taking their underage kid across state lines with an AK15 that he illegally possessed. I’m sure her day in court will come too.

That would be a terrible parent!

Good thing she never did any of that. You would have know it if you had actually watched the trial, rather than get your news from talking heads with an agenda...

Bonnevie 12-09-2021 08:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JMintzer (Post 2037994)
That would be a terrible parent!

Good thing she never did any of that. You would have know it if you had actually watched the trial, rather than get your news from talking heads with an agenda...

no this is what happened: According to court documents and testimony, Kyle Rittenhouse arrived in Kenosha on his own and went to the protest with a friend who provided him with the gun. The gun was kept at the home of the friend’s stepfather in Kenosha.

and Wendy Rittenhouse told the Chicago Tribune in November that she would have tried to stop her son from going to Kenosha, but she didn’t know where he was or what he was doing.

so she has a 17 year old son who lives at home, and she had no idea he has bought a gun (which a friend bought and stored for him) and had no idea where he was.

I'd say it was a school night, but he had dropped out of high school. so she may not have driven him, but she's hardly the model of a mother.

JMintzer 12-09-2021 09:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bonnevie (Post 2038003)
no this is what happened: According to court documents and testimony, Kyle Rittenhouse arrived in Kenosha on his own and went to the protest with a friend who provided him with the gun. The gun was kept at the home of the friend’s stepfather in Kenosha.

and Wendy Rittenhouse told the Chicago Tribune in November that she would have tried to stop her son from going to Kenosha, but she didn’t know where he was or what he was doing.

so she has a 17 year old son who lives at home, and she had no idea he has bought a gun (which a friend bought and stored for him) and had no idea where he was.

I'd say it was a school night, but he had dropped out of high school. so she may not have driven him, but she's hardly the model of a mother.

I never said she was. I was simply commenting on the erroneous information posted.

I never said a word about what you are commenting on, so I'm not sure why you're directing your comment to me...

JMintzer 12-09-2021 09:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bonnevie (Post 2038012)
well, show me the citation where someone in a school setting killed 4 people with a skateboard, or 17 that were killed in Parkland

the issue is gun shooting in schools that started this discussion. yes, there's other types of violence with teenagers just as there's examples of violence in general (Jan. 6 anyone?)

Most of late spring thru the fall of 2020 anyone?

Lindsyburnsy 12-10-2021 07:02 AM

Dad bought the gun and the kid was with him at the time. Posted pics of himself with the gun stating "my new Christmas present". At that age, a new pair of athletic shoes would have been more appropriate.

MDLNB 12-10-2021 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lindsyburnsy (Post 2038266)
Dad bought the gun and the kid was with him at the time. Posted pics of himself with the gun stating "my new Christmas present". At that age, a new pair of athletic shoes would have been more appropriate.


Everyone is entitled to their opinion.

My grandson, now a junior in HS, shot his first buck at age 11yo and his father had the head mounted for display. My children grew up handling firearms and understand firearm safety. I have given my grandson rifles in the past. My daughter has participated in weekend pistol competition, as well as my son-inlaw. My grandkids also operate dirt bikes, ride horses (rescued race type), were active in soccer, basketball, karate and wrestling. If children are taught properly, they are better equipped and mature than many adults. Coddle the kids and the end result is drug overdoses, mass shootings, smash and grab robberies, rapes, etc.

Kyle wished to be a responsible community volunteer. There is something to be said about those that contribute to the community versus those that think that community organizing makes them credible. Regardless of how or when Kyle obtained his rifle, he legally had it on him for protection during rioting and he is alive now because he had it. We need more like him and less like those he was forced to put down.

Gulfcoast 12-17-2021 10:14 AM

I am a staunch supporter of the 2nd amendment but I also think that in cases where it can be proven that there was a cavalier and reckless disregard for the safety of others that a gun owner should be held criminally responsible.

In the case of the Crumbleys I think that the prosecution does, in fact, have evidence that the parents knowingly gave their son access to a gun along with ammunition. They had been notified by the school of their son's google searches for ammo while in class. They had been called into the school on the very day that this incident happened after a teacher discovered a disturbing drawing done by Ethan in class. The parents knew that their kid had access to a weapon but did not tell the school that and they refused to bring their son home with them. Within 2 hours of that meeting their son was shooting up the school.

Yes, the parents should be held accountable for their reckless disregard for the safety of others. They could have prevented this tragedy and they chose not to.

Whether any school officials should be held accountable, too, is a different matter.

Byte1 12-18-2021 08:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gulfcoast (Post 2040592)
I am a staunch supporter of the 2nd amendment but I also think that in cases where it can be proven that there was a cavalier and reckless disregard for the safety of others that a gun owner should be held criminally responsible.

In the case of the Crumbleys I think that the prosecution does, in fact, have evidence that the parents knowingly gave their son access to a gun along with ammunition. They had been notified by the school of their son's google searches for ammo while in class. They had been called into the school on the very day that this incident happened after a teacher discovered a disturbing drawing done by Ethan in class. The parents knew that their kid had access to a weapon but did not tell the school that and they refused to bring their son home with them. Within 2 hours of that meeting their son was shooting up the school.

Yes, the parents should be held accountable for their reckless disregard for the safety of others. They could have prevented this tragedy and they chose not to.

Whether any school officials should be held accountable, too, is a different matter.

Wrong thread.

Lindsyburnsy 12-18-2021 09:28 AM

Hopefully this will start a new trend, holding parents, or any gun owner accountable if a child gets their hands on the firearm and shoots someone with it. I'm sure that if people had to insure their guns just as auto owners have to, people would be a lot more careful about not leaving firearms unlocked and/or where kids can get them. It is time for gun owners to be held accountable!

Caymus 12-18-2021 09:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lindsyburnsy (Post 2040880)
Hopefully this will start a new trend, holding parents, or any gun owner accountable if a child gets their hands on the firearm and shoots someone with it. I'm sure that if people had to insure their guns just as auto owners have to, people would be a lot more careful about not leaving firearms unlocked and/or where kids can get them. It is time for gun owners to be held accountable!

Why not hold parents accountable for any crime committed by a child?

Byte1 12-18-2021 10:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lindsyburnsy (Post 2040880)
Hopefully this will start a new trend, holding parents, or any gun owner accountable if a child gets their hands on the firearm and shoots someone with it. I'm sure that if people had to insure their guns just as auto owners have to, people would be a lot more careful about not leaving firearms unlocked and/or where kids can get them. It is time for gun owners to be held accountable!

If you are speaking of Kyle R. then I disagree with you. I am glad he put them down like rabid dogs. If you are replying to the other post that has nothing to do with the OP, then that is a different story.
Parents should be held responsible if there is proof of negligence. Personally, I have no problem with arsonists, rapists, etc. being taken care of in a manner that saves the taxpayer money and the system expensive time. Repeat offenders are leaches on society and a waste of resources. If judges would harshly penalize the perpetrators to begin with, maybe we would not have such a crime wave that lasts and lasts.

Gulfcoast 12-18-2021 12:21 PM

Kyle Rittenhouse didn't go into that crowd to shoot them up. He was there to stand guard over a car dealership so that violent rioters wouldn't burn the place down. He only fired the weapon when he was attacked and feared for his life.

Self defense is not a crime. If you don't want to get shot, don't beat a guy holding a gun with a skateboard.

OrangeBlossomBaby 12-18-2021 04:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Byte1 (Post 2040926)
If you are speaking of Kyle R. then I disagree with you. I am glad he put them down like rabid dogs. If you are replying to the other post that has nothing to do with the OP, then that is a different story.
Parents should be held responsible if there is proof of negligence. Personally, I have no problem with arsonists, rapists, etc. being taken care of in a manner that saves the taxpayer money and the system expensive time. Repeat offenders are leaches on society and a waste of resources. If judges would harshly penalize the perpetrators to begin with, maybe we would not have such a crime wave that lasts and lasts.

So you're fine with vigilante justice. I'll remember that if I ever see you take a left turn without using your turn signal. #WeThePeople are watching.

OrangeBlossomBaby 12-18-2021 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gulfcoast (Post 2040972)
Kyle Rittenhouse didn't go into that crowd to shoot them up. He was there to stand guard over a car dealership so that violent rioters wouldn't burn the place down. He only fired the weapon when he was attacked and feared for his life.

Self defense is not a crime. If you don't want to get shot, don't beat a guy holding a gun with a skateboard.

He wasn't at the car dealership when he shot any of those three people.

Byte1 12-18-2021 05:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OrangeBlossomBaby (Post 2041034)
So you're fine with vigilante justice. I'll remember that if I ever see you take a left turn without using your turn signal. #WeThePeople are watching.

News Flash, it was not "vigilante justice" by anyone's definition. It was Self Defense, and anyone with a one eyed seeing eye dog could see that. But, follow me around all you wish. I always use my turn signal. SOmetimes, I even remember to turn it off after I make my turn...:1rotfl:

Byte1 12-18-2021 05:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OrangeBlossomBaby (Post 2041035)
He wasn't at the car dealership when he shot any of those three people.

He wasn't hunting them either. He was running from the violence and resorted to force once he felt his life was in danger. Anyone could see that.

JMintzer 12-18-2021 09:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OrangeBlossomBaby (Post 2041035)
He wasn't at the car dealership when he shot any of those three people.

Irrelevant...

JMintzer 12-18-2021 09:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OrangeBlossomBaby (Post 2041035)
He wasn't at the car dealership when he shot any of those three people.

Once again, irrelevant...


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:04 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.