you could not be more wrong - chance of death in Children is like 0.005% and almost all have had other preexisting conditions. 401 deaths in children under 18 from covid since it started. An average influenza year kills 200 kids. in 2009, we lost 477 children to H1N1 Flu, and we didn't call to do anything at all.

In related news - over 4000 children die in car crashes - should we stop allowing them to ride in cars?

From Harvard University -While the risk of COVID causing severe illness and hospitalization is much lower compared to adults, it’s important to remember that at least 491 children ages 0 to 17 years have died from COVID. In addition, long-term adverse health effects even after mild infection in children are now being recognized.

It’s understandable that many parents will be uncomfortable with either choice, vaccinate now or wait. But the rise of the more contagious and possibly more dangerous Delta variant, combined with the protection offered by herd immunity, supports the CDC recommendation that all children ages 12 year and older get vaccinated.

Doesn't anyone care where this virus started? It seems a virus released, that killed millions, the world would like to know.

First, it is not known if it was intentionally released, so, no I am not interested in where. There are investigations going on to try to determine if and where it was released until there is evidence (not common sense, not someone said, not a podiatrist says, but evidence) I am not worried or concerned at all.

There are enough things to worry about that are proven, without taking on all those that are supposition.

There is no way you can get anything from an attenuated (deactivated) vaccine, either...

Not since the old smallpox vaccine has anyone use live vaccines in a vaccination...

I think you meant to say ......... "so they don't even".............

OK. Now I'm officially confused about this. I've seen, on MSM news that " Delta variant has 1000X more viral load" expression a few times now. How can they be referring to the same statistic as the " 2.8 times" stat that you made. These cannot be referring to the same thing.

True.

Very little can go wrong with the mRNA vaccine (I never heard that one before - LOL).

But, seriously, mRNA builds on past vaccine data and has been in testing for decades. There is always the possibility of something happening with anything new, but the odds are in the vaccine's favor.

If we are going to worry about everything new, then most food can not be eaten. Most medications can't be taken. Shouldn't fly on new airplanes for at least a couple of years (Boeing 737Max? and now 787?). And on and on.

Yes, stuff happens. If you want to live your life in a constant state of fear, well, it's your life.

When it comes to vaccines to stop pandemics, I can see them becoming mandatory next year. If we get another significant surge and another 1/2 million Americans die. I don't think that is going to happen; it is unlikely. But then the original was supposed to be self-terminating and no worse than influenza. So, we won't know until we do know just how bad their new variants are.

I believe the benefits of stopping the virus out weight the potentially harmful long-term effects - in my very not so humble opinion. And I am not just talking about medical benefits; there are economic benefits to the country (world!). There are lifestyle benefits to people gaining the confidence to get back to their "normal" lives. There are long-term benefits to children being able to get back to school. And on and on.

I completely understand how some people are concerned that the virus is new and has not undergone long-term testing. But, I struggle to understand how someone our age is so worried about "long-term" side effects that they are not willing to risk it for the good of our country, neighbors, and grandchildren. I mean to be fair, just how "long term" can they be at our age?

I will be lucky if I can get another ten years out of this old worn-out body.

Posted article seems Pollyannish, happy face from the powers that be... For a different more objective prognosis, opinion, youtube Bitchute posts articles a little more alarming...Jus FYI...

Maybe you should view some stats regarding the ages that are MOST affected by the virus. Although, how anyone could not be aware by now is a mystery.

Actually, there is a big difference between a live attenuated vaccine and a dead one.
Dead is dead, you can't get the disease from it
Rarely, however, a live attenuated virus, especially in an immunocompromised host, will give the disease, usually a milder form.
Polio is a live attenuated vaccine, about 1 in a million will develop some form of polio from the vaccine. Someone on this or a related thread posted that their relative did get polio from the vaccine, sad, but also VERY rare.
Measles, Yellow fever, Varicella-Zoster and the nasal spray form of the flu shot are all live attenuated viruses in use today. Smallpox was, but since the disease is extinct, that vaccine is no longer given

Good solid post!

Good post. Thanks for the knowledge!

There are already threads about that. THIS thread is about long-term effects (if any) of the vaccine.

The people who are most affected by it, are people who catch it from someone else.

If there isn't anyone available to give it to them, then it's unlikely they'll catch it, and be affected by it at all.