![]() |
It takes a high tech manufacturing plant typically 5-7 years to build. CEO’s are not bringing their plants back because Trump will be gone well before that time. CEO’s prefer paying for $3 an hour labor along with many raw materials cant be found in the US. Btw, typically a high tech robotic run plant needs HIGHLY skilled educated workers, not the normal joe blow worker. Youll need IT and engineering degrees.
|
Quote:
If so then why do we have our military deployed around the world at great expense to our economy? Its time we pursue policies that support the USAs interest over our so called allies. Germany – Largest U.S. military presence in Europe; bases like Ramstein and Grafenwöhr. Italy – Naval and Air Force bases (e.g., Aviano, Naples). United Kingdom – Several Air Force bases, including RAF Lakenheath. Poland – Increasing troop presence under NATO initiatives. Romania, Bulgaria, and the Baltics (Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania) – Rotational deployments, NATO reassurance. Japan – One of the largest overseas deployments; includes Okinawa and Yokota Air Base. South Korea – Large presence (~28,000 troops) as a deterrent against North Korea. Guam – Strategic U.S. territory with significant naval and air assets. Philippines & Australia – Rotational deployments and training agreements. Turkey – Incirlik Air Base, strategic for Middle East operations. Kuwait – Major logistical and support hub. Qatar – Al Udeid Air Base, key for CENTCOM operations. Bahrain – Home of the U.S. Navy’s 5th Fleet. United Arab Emirates (UAE) – Air Force presence and joint training. Iraq & Syria – Troops remain for anti-ISIS operations and advisory roles. Djibouti – Camp Lemonnier, the main U.S. base in Africa. *****, Kenya, Somalia – Smaller, mission-specific deployments focused on counterterrorism and training. Chart: Where U.S. Troops Are Based Around The World | Statista |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Plant Doesn’t Matter as much as corporate offices
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
There also appears to be a lack of appreciation/understanding for what is in the best interest of the US. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Think about it. If you stop buying products with levied tariffs because you aren’t willing to pay an extra 20% or 50% or 100%, you will need to stop shopping at WalMart, the Dollar Store, Home Depot, etc. These stores may be forced into bankruptcy if tariffs continue for a year. But that is how the trade imbalance is solved. The alternative is for the foreign countries to stop subsidizing their own companies and let the cost of the items rise to what they actually cost to produce and sell. Oh, but doesn’t that raise your costs when you go shopping? Yes. For a lot of things you like to buy, there are no completely American equivalents. You will either have to do without or pay higher costs for the overseas product you love, and your purchase at least, at that higher price, will put more money in our U.S. Treasury. It’s a bit like a Luxury Tax, but a Luxury Tax on WalMart Shoppers who used to buy products there because they were less expensive. |
:cryin2: All this consternation makes me glad I'm on the other side of 70.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
So you're telling us every worker in a high tech manufacturing plant has an IT and Engineering degree? It's most likely all those educational skills were gleaned from American colleges where we blindly educate students from all different countries and send our brilliance back to their homes. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:15 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by
DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.