![]() |
Quote:
k. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Since on this thread there is comparison of other countries then read this. This was just sent to me...probably easy to confirm: Venezuela Time Line 1992 it became 3rd riches country in hemisphere (think of that a minute) 1997 It because 2nd largest purchaser of F-150 2001 Voted for Socialist President (income inequality) 2004 Private HEALTHCARE is completely socialized 2007 All private education becomes “free” 2009 All private ownership of hand guns banned 2012 Bernie Sanders praises their “American Dream” 2014 Opposition leaders are imprisoned 2016 Food / healthcare shortages become widespread 2017 CONSTITUTION and elections are suspended 2019 Unarmed citizens are massacred by their own country It took only one generation of progressive leadership to plunge this country into Civil War. |
Quote:
New FAIR Study: Illegal Immigration Costs $116 billion Annually September 27, 2017 | IRLI Staff Brunt of Costs Fall on State and Local Taxpayers (Washington, D.C.) - Illegal immigration to the U.S. costs federal, state and local taxpayers a staggering net cost of $116 billion a year - an increase of some $16 billion compared to previous estimates - according to a new study released by the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR). The study is the most comprehensive to date on the cost to federal, state and local taxpayers of the nation's 12.5 million illegal immigrants and their 4.2 million citizen children. Costs Soar The report, “The Fiscal Burden of Illegal Immigration on United States Taxpayers,” examines the cost of illegal immigration through a detailed analysis of federal, state and local programs that are available to the nation’s illegal immigrant population, their U.S.-born children, or accessed via fraud. The study tallies the impact on education, medical, justice/enforcement, welfare and other government programs. The report notes that the $116 billion cost of illegal immigration falls on state and local taxpayers disproportionately – by a ratio of roughly 2 to 1 – with state and local expenditures totaling $88.9 billion and Federal expenditures totaling $45.8 billion, with only approximately $19 billion recouped in taxes. Taxes Paid Inadequate The staggering total costs of illegal immigrants and their children outweigh the taxes paid to federal and state governments by a ratio of roughly 7 to 1, with costs at nearly $135 billion compared to tax revenues at nearly $19 billion. All told, the nearly $135 billion paid out by federal and state and local taxpayers to cover the cost of the presence of 12.5 million illegal aliens and their 4.2 million citizen children amounts to approximately $8,075 per illegal alien and citizen child prior to taxes paid, or $6,940 per person after taxes are paid. On the federal level, medical ($17.14 billion) is by far the highest cost, with law enforcement coming second ($13.15 billion) and general government services ($8 billion) third. At the state and local level, education ($44.4 billion) was by far the largest expense, followed by general public services ($18.5 billion) and medical ($12.1 billion). The study also includes cost and tax revenue estimates per state. The top three states based on total cost to state taxpayers for illegal immigrants and their children: California ($23 billion); Texas ($10.9 billion), and New York ($7.5 billion). I do not believe that any countries that have free health care extend coverage to non citizens. They don't have the economic stress we have from porous borders. |
Quote:
Venezuela refused to admit they had problem when oil income was reduced. Thy welcomed an authoritarian leader who eventually became butal, and that in concert with not acknowledging the economics at play. I don't think a Bernie Snders jab in the middle makes this a serious anthology. |
Quote:
If blaming these folks makes you feel good, go for it. But, if you want to discuss healthcare, you are on a wrong street. Talk to those who are elected as to why, despite loud protestation, they ignore the problem of healthcare. This does not mean I favor one form or another....it simply means when our leaders begin to discuss it, we are moving in the right direction on healthcare. Blaming minorities for everything is just stupid, as we keep jailing those who do not fit the assigned slot |
Quote:
|
Sloooooowly I turn, step by step.
Why does all of this noise have to be in extremes? A manageable, doable start is to resuscitate the ACA before it is too late. (Yeah. I know. I am repeating myself. I said that a buzillion posts earlier in this thread.) They are stealthily coming after the protection of pre-existing conditions, the best part of the ACA. The cruelty of taking that protection away makes my skin crawl. Even though many here are ensconced in Medicare, due to turning 65, surely there must be concern for younger family members and friends — and (in my dreams) concern for the overall health of the nation, both literally and figuratively. Real solutions are there, but fixing healthcare has to be done in steps. Also, all the players have to be at the table, including insurance companies and corporations that make health insurance available to employees. What happened to critical thinking skills — independent thinking, analytical thinking, realistic solution-seeking thinking? Pogo was right. (I gotta stop looking at this thread and make some phone calls to tell the people who could actually do something sensible what to do. uh huh) |
Quote:
The problem with trying to do this in The US is that it can't be paid for if we taxed the top 5% at 100%. And even if we did, can we trust to government to run a cost efficient system that provides good service? What other government agencies can you think of that are cost efficient and well run? |
To all retirees not in favor of socialized health care we should give up our Medicare and pay for our fair share of health care on the open market like non retirees do. This way we can insure better and freer choices while preserving democracy. Or are we talking about just the other guys not on Medicare?
|
Quote:
ACA was/is not perfect......I was very opposed, BUT I figured that leaders would discuss it openly and make adjustments. Obvious it was simply destroyed (openly saving the death knell for an election cycle...look it up...its true), and we are told it will be replaced. BY WHAT ? Nobody talks anymore except about themselves, and of course WHO is to blame, and it is never US who allow this to go on. |
Quote:
|
...
|
Quote:
It is a word that is used simply for politics and the true meaning is long gone. |
When we’re a socialist country we’ll have universal health care. Be careful what you wish for my friends, be careful.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:04 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by
DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.