Talk of The Villages Florida

Talk of The Villages Florida (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/)
-   Medical and Health Discussion (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/medical-health-discussion-94/)
-   -   Be wary of local cardiologist (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/medical-health-discussion-94/wary-local-cardiologist-61220/)

Carl in Tampa 10-05-2012 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Villages PL (Post 563153)
All heart patients should be warry of all heart doctors, in my opinion. Most of them (again my opinion) will never give the option of lifestyle changes to reverse coronary artery disease. They are in business to make money and placing stints or giving by pass surgery pays a heck of a lot more than giving someone a stern warning and a diet/exercise plan.

I disagree. My cardiologists have always encouraged me to modify my lifestyle (usually by losing weight and exercising) to control my blood pressure and protect my heart.

Here in TV I go to Dr. Georg Couturier at Heart of The Villages in Spanish Springs. On my first office visit he spent one hour with me explaining my heart condition to me and detailing what I must do to avoid further damage to my heart. He did this while he had several other patients in the waiting room and his reimbursement was at the Medicare rate which actually pays for an office visit of under 15 minutes.

The man is a gem!

BBQMan 10-05-2012 09:20 PM

GG, I applaud your support of Physicians you believe to be capable. Unfortunately, in my experience, they are not. We draw the physicians who cannot make a living in anything other than a Medicare environment. In my case, I had a heart problem that required a pacemaker. The pacemaker was installed, (put in place) by a surgeon in a large cardiac practice, with a Villages office. The procedure was done at LRMC. Nothing got better. I had a series of tests over the next few months. Action resulting - zero. Choosing to try to live, I went to Mayo Clinic in Jacksonville. The initial office exam showed that my pacemaker was not working correctly. The Medtronic rep confirmed this.

Initial surgery was done to repair the pacemaker. Surgery showed that (1) one of the two leads was never attached; (2) the other lead had very high impedance; and (3) it was not the right pacemaker to start with. The surgeon, at a subsequent operation put in place a three lead, biventricular pacemaker. I'm doing well now, thanks to Mayo and in no way thanks to to the local cardiologists. If it were up to them, I'd be dead.

I had a similar experienced with my wife. She fell and broke her hip. I interrupted the surgery to discover that after 45 minutes, they did not have an IV capable of providing the need meds to her. If this is not incompetence, please define it for me.

My encouragement to my fellow Villagers is (1) if you need a flu shot go to you local doctor; (2) if you have any reason to believe your may seriously ill – get out of town! The physicians in the Villages settled here either to retire or because they were not accepted as competent by their peers. No one came here to blaze new trails or be a leader in their specialty.

SALYBOW 10-06-2012 05:32 AM

Maybe I can help. Go to Dr. George Couterier and avoid all this. You get the best of the best at the same time.

graciegirl 10-06-2012 05:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BBQMan (Post 564086)
GG, I applaud your support of Physicians you believe to be capable. Unfortunately, in my experience, they are not. We draw the physicians who cannot make a living in anything other than a Medicare environment. In my case, I had a heart problem that required a pacemaker. The pacemaker was installed, (put in place) by a surgeon in a large cardiac practice, with a Villages office. The procedure was done at LRMC. Nothing got better. I had a series of tests over the next few months. Action resulting - zero. Choosing to try to live, I went to Mayo Clinic in Jacksonville. The initial office exam showed that my pacemaker was not working correctly. The Medtronic rep confirmed this.

Initial surgery was done to repair the pacemaker. Surgery showed that (1) one of the two leads was never attached; (2) the other lead had very high impedance; and (3) it was not the right pacemaker to start with. The surgeon, at a subsequent operation put in place a three lead, biventricular pacemaker. I'm doing well now, thanks to Mayo and in no way thanks to to the local cardiologists. If it were up to them, I'd be dead.

I had a similar experienced with my wife. She fell and broke her hip. I interrupted the surgery to discover that after 45 minutes, they did not have an IV capable of providing the need meds to her. If this is not incompetence, please define it for me.

My encouragement to my fellow Villagers is (1) if you need a flu shot go to you local doctor; (2) if you have any reason to believe your may seriously ill – get out of town! The physicians in the Villages settled here either to retire or because they were not accepted as competent by their peers. No one came here to blaze new trails or be a leader in their specialty.

I don't think I said anything in support of any local medical institution. I haven't consulted anyone here for cancer or heart, we return to Cincinnati for those continued medical evaluations. I have no experience with local hospitals. We see a GP here.

784caroline 10-06-2012 06:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Villages PL (Post 563153)
All heart patients should be warry of all heart doctors, in my opinion. Most of them (again my opinion) will never give the option of lifestyle changes to reverse coronary artery disease. They are in business to make money and placing stints or giving by pass surgery pays a heck of a lot more than giving someone a stern warning and a diet/exercise plan.

DISAGREE ....DISAGREE a post like this is a disservice to all. There are good and bad Doctors in all fields and each individual doctor has his/her standard method of diagonsis. Yes they do make money ...why shouldnt they....but if I need a heart DR. hopefully I will select one based on referrals/recommendations.

Gracies comments are right on.....

mrsanborn 10-06-2012 10:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BBQMan (Post 564086)
GG, I applaud your support of Physicians you believe to be capable. Unfortunately, in my experience, they are not. We draw the physicians who cannot make a living in anything other than a Medicare environment. In my case, I had a heart problem that required a pacemaker. The pacemaker was installed, (put in place) by a surgeon in a large cardiac practice, with a Villages office. The procedure was done at LRMC. Nothing got better. I had a series of tests over the next few months. Action resulting - zero. Choosing to try to live, I went to Mayo Clinic in Jacksonville. The initial office exam showed that my pacemaker was not working correctly. The Medtronic rep confirmed this.

Initial surgery was done to repair the pacemaker. Surgery showed that (1) one of the two leads was never attached; (2) the other lead had very high impedance; and (3) it was not the right pacemaker to start with. The surgeon, at a subsequent operation put in place a three lead, biventricular pacemaker. I'm doing well now, thanks to Mayo and in no way thanks to to the local cardiologists. If it were up to them, I'd be dead.

I had a similar experienced with my wife. She fell and broke her hip. I interrupted the surgery to discover that after 45 minutes, they did not have an IV capable of providing the need meds to her. If this is not incompetence, please define it for me.

My encouragement to my fellow Villagers is (1) if you need a flu shot go to you local doctor; (2) if you have any reason to believe your may seriously ill – get out of town! The physicians in the Villages settled here either to retire or because they were not accepted as competent by their peers. No one came here to blaze new trails or be a leader in their specialty.

I too had an ICD/Pacemaker implanted at LRMC. I also felt the care I received at LRMC was of very high quality. What I don't understand through your experience is why didn't the Medtronics tech find these problems at the time of the implantation? The device is tested either the day of implantation or the very next day.

I would have think that you have a giant malpractice suit going on against this Village practice and the surgeon that preformed the operation. So, have your attorney's issued a gag order or are you going to name names?

Your number 2 is quite a statement. My cardiologist is Dr. Brian Saluck who I would highly recommend. He is in his 40's and has a very impressive bio so I don't believe he came here to retire just yet.

BBQMan 10-06-2012 12:02 PM

I'm glad to know that you were satisfied with the treatment you received and the outcome was good. As for a lawsuit, I've been involved in two of them (neither medically connected) and came out of them never wanting to be involved in one again although I did 'win' in both cases. The truth of the matter is that the attorneys won as they do in most suits. Life is too short to waste it on things that really do not matter.

I maintain that my advice to get out of The Villages is valid. Even if you have a great physician, the requisite support does not exist here. Ask yourself the question, "If my physician is as good as I believe, why isn't he/she practicing in a major medical center?"

Shimpy 10-06-2012 01:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by graciegirl (Post 564126)
I don't think I said anything in support of any local medical institution. I haven't consulted anyone here for cancer or heart, we return to Cincinnati for those continued medical evaluations. I have no experience with local hospitals. We see a GP here.

You sound like my uncle who used to visit us once a year in Miami when I was a kid. If he had any need for a doctor he would cut his visit short and catch the next plane to Pittsburgh because that was the only place to get good doctors. One year he left the next day after arriving because he got a toothache.

shrink 10-12-2012 07:07 PM

oic

shrink 10-12-2012 07:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gemorc (Post 562465)
Sorry Shrink, I do not understand. By not posting this doctors name, you cast aspersions on all LOCAL cardiologists. Maybe it is my doctor, I don't know. If you are going to post a thread like this, have the nerve to state the facts.

Well, if you are willing to pay my legal expenses if I post this doctor's name and am sued for slander, please let me know that. Give me access to your bank account, and I'll gladly do as you suggest. Maybe if you would read my description of what happened, along with my suggestion to check internet sites such as vitals.com, you could be a bit more informed and protected. Why do you think I posted? It was to save people such as yourself from having a similar experience. Best of luck.

Villages PL 10-13-2012 10:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ilovetv (Post 563257)
BULL-Oney!!!! Non-Invasive Cardiologists do not do these surgeries. They are trained in internal medicine first and are not surgeons.

You paint with a broad brush the very professionals people need both before and during a life-threatening disease/condition.

I clearly stated "most of them", not all of them, and I stand by my statement. Cardiologists are trained for both but the only difference is the non-invasive approach does not employ catheters, ballons, and stents.

They are in business, just like any other business, to make money.

The pharmacist on this site agrees with me as he once pointed out that doctors [more often than not] choose to protect their butts by overtreating their patients (rather than relying on natural means). So, I repeat, be warry of all heart doctors.

Villages PL 10-13-2012 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 784caroline (Post 564132)
DISAGREE ....DISAGREE a post like this is a disservice to all. There are good and bad Doctors in all fields and each individual doctor has his/her standard method of diagonsis. Yes they do make money ...why shouldnt they....but if I need a heart DR. hopefully I will select one based on referrals/recommendations.

I DISAGREE.....DISAGREE.....DISAGREE. (My three "DISAGREES" beat your two disagrees) :wave:

My post is not a disservice because it warns people to be cautious (as apposed to uncautious and laxidasical) No one should go through life blindly trusting everyone. We all know there are good and bad doctors; that's why people need to be warry of all doctors. One can never know for sure whether a doctor will turn out to be good or bad, even with a friend's recommendation.

Villages PL 10-13-2012 11:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by graciegirl (Post 563324)
You are again, in my opinion, proceeding from inaccurate information.

Here is the index page from The Mayo Clinic's book. Heart Healthy for Life.

They are first interested in life changes, stepping up exercise and changing your diet.


Mayo Clinic Healthy Heart for Life
https://store.mayoclinic.com/BMC/ima.../293400_02.jpg

Yes, but that's a book, not a doctor. My local library is full of good books and some of them are about heart care.

Villages PL 10-13-2012 12:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by graciegirl (Post 563327)
And here is from preventative health information page from The Cleveland Clinic, The Best in the country for problems with the heart and cardiovascular system
Heart & Vascular Health and Prevention


Preventive Cardiology and Rehabilitation

The Section of Preventive Cardiology and Rehabilitation helps those who already have heart and vascular disease and those who are at high risk of developing it.
Individualized & Group Prevention Programs

Preventive Cardiology and Rehabilitation offers a multidisciplinary approach to preventing the occurrence or progression of cardiovascular disease: nutritional services, prescriptive exercise programs, stress testing, multiple cardiovascular risk reduction programs, peripheral vascular rehabilitation program in collaboration with Vascular Medicine, comprehensive cardiovascular care for women, and educational programs for patients and healthcare providers. Nutrition Services
Group Exercise Programs and Individual Exercise Consultation
Specialized Programs for Women and Teens
Learn More About These Prevention Topics:
Web Chats
Interactive Tools
Reviewed: 08/12


.

Lots of information but I didn't find anywhere to "click on" to find out their diet recommendations for reversing coronary artery disease. So that leaves me skeptical. In my mind it means the clinic doesn't want to do anything that substantive which could potentially take business away from doctors.

Villages PL 10-13-2012 12:19 PM

Deleted duplicate post

rubicon 10-13-2012 02:22 PM

The OP comments are instructive concerning the need for each of us to be good consumers of medical services and products. it also is instructive as to te conflict presented to health carriers. simply stated trying to determine which medical professions are ordering unnecessary and/or over priced testing, drugs, therapies, etc.

Medical professionals like all of us are in business to make a living but also charged with our care. Most are good caring people.

I left myprimary care doc here because he in my opinion was ordering unnecessary testing ,etc. Conversely, I have a cardiologist that substitutes as my primary care doc and he is very professional and caring.

Conversely I can tell you that I had the number one surgeon in the State of Minnesota in his field. A surgeon my specialist, who was also listed as the number one in the State in his field, said was the surgeon doctors go to for care

I won't bore you with details, but Ttis number one surgeon almost killed me leaing me in what was termed grave conditions and left me in hopsital care for 31 days, the need for a drug induced coma and 4 months of rhab at home.

Speak up when at the docotr's office for both of your benefits.

Shirleevee 10-13-2012 02:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrsanborn (Post 564202)
I too had an ICD/Pacemaker implanted at LRMC. I also felt the care I received at LRMC was of very high quality. What I don't understand through your experience is why didn't the Medtronics tech find these problems at the time of the implantation? The device is tested either the day of implantation or the very next day.

I would have think that you have a giant malpractice suit going on against this Village practice and the surgeon that preformed the operation. So, have your attorney's issued a gag order or are you going to name names?

Your number 2 is quite a statement. My cardiologist is Dr. Brian Saluck who I would highly recommend. He is in his 40's and has a very impressive bio so I don't believe he came here to retire just yet.

We are from NY where health care is excellent. My husband had a stent done here by a Cardiologist we liked very much and one year later surgery for and AAA.....we liked the Thoracic surgeon too.....not every great doctor can work at the Cleveland Clinic or Columbia Pres........in our experience, there are great doctors everywhere. JMHO

shrink 10-14-2012 10:50 AM

Carl, thanks for writing. I need to tell you that in this case, "runs like an assembly line" does NOT represent a well organized and efficient office. My cardiologist up North and I requested FIVE TIMES that records be sent. It wasn't until I threatened legal action that the records were sent. Of course, they showed no problem, no need for further investigation, etc. That's the reason the requests were ignored in the first place. You're right...after the fact billing IS too late. And re: the treadmill test, there was absolutely no reason why I couldn't have taken that test. I quit smoking 25 years ago, am not obese, etc. I was never given the option, nor from what I could see, is anyone else who is a patient there. Your point that I should have directed others to vitals.com is very well taken, and I will do that in the future should I run across (heaven forbid) another such practitioner. Thanks again.

shrink 10-14-2012 11:09 AM

Re: why tested when no symptoms.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carl in Tampa (Post 563919)
You confuse me.

A nuclear stress test can be executed either on a treadmill or through the use of chemical stimulation of your heart. It all depends upon whether you are physically capable of exercising on the treadmill long enough to get your heart to the target heart rate.

In either case, treadmill or chemical, the thing that makes it a nuclear stress test is based upon the injection of nuclear material into your blood stream before the test begins.

You condemn an office that is "run like an assembly line." Couldn't that also be characterized as simply being well organized and efficient?

You say that one should steer clear if you get bills that do not reflect what was actually done. By then it's too late to steer clear.

Your original post, although possibly well meaning, is totally valueless because of your failure to provide the name of the doctor.

Perhaps you could have simply recommended that people should check out that doctor by name on the web site where you say others have criticized him.

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrsyarbie (Post 563356)
I don't understand, if you had no symptoms what prompted you to seek a cardiologist? Did you have angina? or shortness of breath? did you have fainting spells ?? feelings of discomfort when you exert yourself, you said you were asymptomatic but angina comes in many forms not just chest pain so I find your remarks confusing... I worked for USF Health Cardiology for 16 years and can recommend many excellant cardiologists just 90 minutes away if you like.A nuclear test is done rather than a treadmill test for many reasons for example because heavy smokers usually tire out and develop shortness breath before the test can be completed properly and diagnosed , or also in cases of obesity. Hope if you have any type of cardiac related disease like hypertension you will continue to seek care..

Hello. If you read the entire thread, you would understand why I initially agreed to have some tests done. The doctor scared me half to death! The conversation came up while my husband was being tested (and by the way, also without symptoms, but had been referred by another "good ol' boy"...."just to be on the safe side"). I was advised that it would be in my best interest due to a past ( I quit 25 years ago) hx of smoking and a family history of heart disease. However, I had and have no symptoms. I was told that I could drop dead any second even without symptoms. It has since dawned on me that I can be stuck by a car, lightning, or a wayward crane bucket and die without any warning, too. Should I be tested for being in the wrong place at the wrong time? This was not good medicine; it was simply a means for lining the pocket of a greedy and unscrupulous individual (IMHO!).

sandybill2 10-14-2012 04:45 PM

I worked in Cardiology office for 30+ years---started out assisting and at the time of my retirement was the Business Office Manager. The charge you saw for 174.00 for treadmill test that you said you didn't actually have was probably for supplies. When billing is done--each and every component of the test has a separate CPT code (this is a universal code that tells the insurance companies what is being billed) I am guessing that this code and charge was probably for supplies---maybe even the Nuclear infusion that was done. Can't be sure but I would imagine if you went to the Cardiology office for a Cardiostress test the charge would be more than 174.00.

shrink 10-15-2012 05:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sandybill2 (Post 567795)
I worked in Cardiology office for 30+ years---started out assisting and at the time of my retirement was the Business Office Manager. The charge you saw for 174.00 for treadmill test that you said you didn't actually have was probably for supplies. When billing is done--each and every component of the test has a separate CPT code (this is a universal code that tells the insurance companies what is being billed) I am guessing that this code and charge was probably for supplies---maybe even the Nuclear infusion that was done. Can't be sure but I would imagine if you went to the Cardiology office for a Cardiostress test the charge would be more than 174.00.

Thanks for writing and I appreciate your expertise. The CPT code was 93015, "Cardio treadmill stress test w/EKG, with MD" (which I never had). The "supplies" that you mentioned: Myocardial perfusion imaging ($982.00), Injection, regadenoson ($408.00) and Technetium tc-99m sestamibi, DX, study dose ($944.00) referenced the thallium stress test, which was the only stress test I had. I'm not a medical person, but I'm getting there!

Mack184 10-15-2012 05:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shrink (Post 561205)
I am reluctant to post a specific name on a public forum. I simply advise that if it seems like too many tests are being run, if you are being told you need a nuclear stress test if in fact you are capable of doing a treadmill test, if the office seems to run like an assembly line, if you overhear one patient after another being scheduled for angiograms, if you get bills which do not reflect what was actually done, etc., steer clear.

Let me explain something. My wife is a very qualified medical professional. Most doctors today will put you through lots of tests. Many tests that you cannot understand why they are doing it and what it has to do with your case. It is not fraud. They are protecting THEMSELVES!!!

Unfortunately in today's world doctors are being sued at the drop of a hat. And when that case gets into court the doctor and the attending nurses and assistants are going to be grilled over and over and over again as to why this test or that test was not run. And then when the lawyer finds some little test that wasn't run because the doctor didn't feel you needed that test, he's going to be sued for millions of dollars!!

No..maybe you won't sue the doctor, but hundreds of others are going to try because they have been misled that they have been "injured" by neglect and that they can now hit the lottery off this doctor or provider's misfortune. Have you looked at any TV (not the villages) commercials these days? There are lawyers by the boat-load offering to "get you substantial money" from some doctor who didn't perform some test, which had nothing to do with providing you with good healthcare.

Most extra tests have nothing to do with fraud. It's about your doctor keeping his license to be able to save your life!!!

shrink 10-16-2012 03:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mack184 (Post 568276)
Let me explain something. My wife is a very qualified medical professional. Most doctors today will put you through lots of tests. Many tests that you cannot understand why they are doing it and what it has to do with your case. It is not fraud. They are protecting THEMSELVES!!!

Unfortunately in today's world doctors are being sued at the drop of a hat. And when that case gets into court the doctor and the attending nurses and assistants are going to be grilled over and over and over again as to why this test or that test was not run. And then when the lawyer finds some little test that wasn't run because the doctor didn't feel you needed that test, he's going to be sued for millions of dollars!!

No..maybe you won't sue the doctor, but hundreds of others are going to try because they have been misled that they have been "injured" by neglect and that they can now hit the lottery off this doctor or provider's misfortune. Have you looked at any TV (not the villages) commercials these days? There are lawyers by the boat-load offering to "get you substantial money" from some doctor who didn't perform some test, which had nothing to do with providing you with good healthcare.

Most extra tests have nothing to do with fraud. It's about your doctor keeping his license to be able to save your life!!!

That's an interesting perspective, and I'll think that over. Thanks for sharing.

Villages PL 10-16-2012 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mack184 (Post 568276)
Let me explain something. My wife is a very qualified medical professional. Most doctors today will put you through lots of tests. Many tests that you cannot understand why they are doing it and what it has to do with your case. It is not fraud. They are protecting THEMSELVES!!!

Unfortunately in today's world doctors are being sued at the drop of a hat. And when that case gets into court the doctor and the attending nurses and assistants are going to be grilled over and over and over again as to why this test or that test was not run. And then when the lawyer finds some little test that wasn't run because the doctor didn't feel you needed that test, he's going to be sued for millions of dollars!!

No..maybe you won't sue the doctor, but hundreds of others are going to try because they have been misled that they have been "injured" by neglect and that they can now hit the lottery off this doctor or provider's misfortune. Have you looked at any TV (not the villages) commercials these days? There are lawyers by the boat-load offering to "get you substantial money" from some doctor who didn't perform some test, which had nothing to do with providing you with good healthcare.

Most extra tests have nothing to do with fraud. It's about your doctor keeping his license to be able to save your life!!!

All the more reason for us to educate ourselves so we can refuse these unnecessary tests. Many years ago I did refuse an expensive moving picture xray of my neck. I had some difficulty swallowing which was due to heat stress. It was gradually getting better (it's a long story) but the doctor recommended this test to rule out cancer. I reasoned that if it was cancer, it would have gotten worse over time, not better. So I refused the test.

rubicon 10-16-2012 05:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mack184 (Post 568276)
Let me explain something. My wife is a very qualified medical professional. Most doctors today will put you through lots of tests. Many tests that you cannot understand why they are doing it and what it has to do with your case. It is not fraud. They are protecting THEMSELVES!!!

Unfortunately in today's world doctors are being sued at the drop of a hat. And when that case gets into court the doctor and the attending nurses and assistants are going to be grilled over and over and over again as to why this test or that test was not run. And then when the lawyer finds some little test that wasn't run because the doctor didn't feel you needed that test, he's going to be sued for millions of dollars!!

No..maybe you won't sue the doctor, but hundreds of others are going to try because they have been misled that they have been "injured" by neglect and that they can now hit the lottery off this doctor or provider's misfortune. Have you looked at any TV (not the villages) commercials these days? There are lawyers by the boat-load offering to "get you substantial money" from some doctor who didn't perform some test, which had nothing to do with providing you with good healthcare.

Most extra tests have nothing to do with fraud. It's about your doctor keeping his license to be able to save your life!!!

Mack: You are spot on. Yet, you have the government and insurance companies making decisions on what test, operations a doctor can conduct. Does that make sense? Neither the governemnt or an insurance comapny should get between you and your doctor. if the government or an insurance comapny believes that their are abuses then they have the tools to investigate.

Finally "he who doctors himself has a fool for a patient

wendyquat 10-16-2012 08:27 PM

Shrink, I sent you a pm.

Villages PL 10-17-2012 04:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mack184 (Post 568276)
Let me explain something. My wife is a very qualified medical professional. Most doctors today will put you through lots of tests. Many tests that you cannot understand why they are doing it and what it has to do with your case. It is not fraud. They are protecting THEMSELVES!!!

The owner/manager of the new Villages Clinics has promised to save money by not doing ANY unnecessary testing. And this is supposed to be the result of employing better doctors.

How does this square with your suggestion that doctors need to give lots of tests to protect themselves?

Villages PL 10-17-2012 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rubicon (Post 568698)

Finally "he who doctors himself has a fool for a patient

Those who can't think for themselves should at least go for a second opinion.

OurHappyHome 10-17-2012 05:02 PM

The problem you are all missing is the meaning of the word necessary. We do our best to diagnose and treat patients. Obviously, this is how we make a living. But, I found that you do make more money by being the best doctor possible and treating your patients the same way you would treat another physician, i.e. an educated consumer.

That being said, this is not making a cake where there is an exact recipe. For example, my neighbor just went to the hospital with symptoms and a history that would force a good doctor to do a heart work up. That would include labs (done many times over 3 days) and a stress test. All this to rule out something he didn't have.

In some hospitals he also would have had to do an angiogram. This is an invasive procedure, and that may have been the time for the patient to ask himself if it is 'really' needed. The question are: do you do the test to be sure or safe? In addition, do you do it to protect against malpractice if something is there that could be missed?

This is an art and a science, and as doctors... we make EDUCATED guesses. I am not speaking to what this doctor ( the one in the thread ) did or should have done. I can just tell you that most doctors don't spend 10 plus years or 75 plus hour weeks with little or no pay, motivated by ripping people off.

Mostly they want to help people. I know there are a few bad apples. But maybe this thread could have started with: 'Do you think these tests A,B, and C are excessive for these symptoms?' 'What tests have your doctor done for this?'... That might have opened a more useful dialog.

P.S. Sorry for any typos as I did this on my iPhone.

pooh 10-17-2012 06:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DoctorA (Post 569032)
The problem you are all missing is the meaning of the word necessary. We do our best to diagnose and treat patients. Obviously, this is how we make a living. But, I found that you do make more money by being the best doctor possible and treating your patients the same way you would treat another physician, i.e. an educated consumer.

That being said, this is not making a cake where there is an exact recipe. For example, my neighbor just went to the hospital with symptoms and a history that would force a good doctor to do a heart work up. That would include labs (done many times over 3 days) and a stress test. All this to rule out something he didn't have.

In some hospitals he also would have had to do an angiogram. This is an invasive procedure, and that may have been the time for the patient to ask himself if it is 'really' needed. The question are: do you do the test to be sure or safe? In addition, do you do it to protect against malpractice if something is there that could be missed?

This is an art and a science, and as doctors... we make EDUCATED guesses. I am not speaking to what this doctor ( the one in the thread ) did or should have done. I can just tell you that most doctors don't spend 10 plus years or 75 plus hour weeks with little or no pay, motivated by ripping people off.

Mostly they want to help people. I know there are a few bad apples. But maybe this thread could have started with: 'Do you think these tests A,B, and C are excessive for these symptoms?' 'What tests have your doctor done for this?'... That might have opened a more useful dialog.

P.S. Sorry for any typos as I did this on my iPhone.

Thank you!!!

(And you did a fine job using your phone.)

Mack184 10-17-2012 08:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Villages PL (Post 569022)
The owner/manager of the new Villages Clinics has promised to save money by not doing ANY unnecessary testing. And this is supposed to be the result of employing better doctors.

How does this square with your suggestion that doctors need to give lots of tests to protect themselves?

What do you mean how does it square? What is his definition of unnecessary? What is his definition of better doctors? Did they come from better medical schools? Did they have excellent patient records? Does he pay them more? My wife has walked in to see a patient and the patient, or someone with them flips open a notebook and starts writing things down. When my wife askes what they are writing she has been known to get answers such as "This is just in case we decide to sue you later". Again, define unnecessary.

ssmith 10-18-2012 08:05 AM

Mack
 
Agree with your post and the the good doctors post. Unfortunatley dueto the legal system and the law suits, doctors have to order tests. I am an RN in a large Cardiology office up north.

Know this, you also have the right to refuse a test. I am glad that nothing was wrong with you but most Americans do have build up in their arteries due to our lifestyle and diet and with other factors like smoking, family history, etc it is warranted to check it out.

I would call the billing dept. at the office so they would explain the billing that was done.

Villages PL 10-19-2012 04:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mack184 (Post 568276)
There are lawyers by the boat-load offering to "get you substantial money" from some doctor who didn't perform some test, which had nothing to do with providing you with good healthcare.

Quote:

Again, define unnecessary.

I think you defined unnecessary tests above. In your own words, "....some test[s], which had nothing to do with providing you with good healthcare."

PaPaLarry 10-19-2012 06:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Villages PL (Post 563153)
All heart patients should be warry of all heart doctors, in my opinion. Most of them (again my opinion) will never give the option of lifestyle changes to reverse coronary artery disease. They are in business to make money and placing stints or giving by pass surgery pays a heck of a lot more than giving someone a stern warning and a diet/exercise plan.

I don't agree with that. I go to Florida Heart & Vascular and really appreciate the way my Heart Doctor cares. In fact, I like going through tests that Doctor recommends, when its needed, to determine questions that arise. Because of Doctor and tests, I now see Heart Doctor once a year. Having a good heart mentally, helps a heart physically. God Bless our medical Profession. Bad apples are everywhere, but doesn't mean the tree is bad

Mack184 10-19-2012 07:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Villages PL (Post 569762)
I think you defined unnecessary tests above. In your own words, "....some test[s], which had nothing to do with providing you with good healthcare."

You don't get it..and you never will. I'm out.

Villages PL 10-20-2012 11:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PaPaLarry (Post 569814)
I don't agree with that. I go to Florida Heart & Vascular and really appreciate the way my Heart Doctor cares. In fact, I like going through tests that Doctor recommends, when its needed, to determine questions that arise. Because of Doctor and tests, I now see Heart Doctor once a year. Having a good heart mentally, helps a heart physically. God Bless our medical Profession. Bad apples are everywhere, but doesn't mean the tree is bad

From my experience on this board and elsewhere, most people will say that we (patients) don't know enough to make our own decisions. They say we are fools if we try to make our own decisions. But, often, those same people claim to know the difference between a "good" doctor and a "bad" doctor. On what basis do they decide if they don't know which tests and treatments are needed and which are not needed?


I think perhaps most of it is decided because of the atmosphere that is created in the doctor's office. If a patient gets a warm attentive reception from the receptionist, nurse and doctor, that tends to put one in a happy receptive mood. From there on in, much of what is done is judged to be necessary. And that judgement comes inspite of the fact that we are told that we are not supposed to know anything. In most cases, I would call such judgements "nebulous".

There's a saying that goes something like this: Caring about the patient is one of the most important tools in a doctor's practice, so, if the doctor can fake it, he or she has it made.

Note: Bernard Madoff was a smooth operator who seemed to care about people, or so they thought, until he was found out to be a crook who only cared about himself.

2-crazy 10-20-2012 06:49 PM

I for one understand the frustration that ‘shrink’ is going through and the DoctorA comment about the malpractice suits is right on target. In my opinion many tests performed is to protect against those suits that are common in this medical field. It is the current medical system and insurance firms that drive this sometimes unnecessary function in a doctors practice. There is a reason it is called a practice and with the specialty in medicine, the GP cannot take the chance of diagnosing anymore even if they think they know the problem. Sad state of affairs.

Shirleevee 10-20-2012 07:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pooh (Post 569069)
Thank you!!!

(And you did a fine job using your phone.)

When we moved here, my husband went to a Cardiologist and told him of all his health issues. After taking a verbal history and noting that he is extremely active and eats clean, he said that he would like to do a stress test. That done, he said he wanted to do an Angiogram. Hubby had one the previous year and all was well.......but he had one and a 90% blockage was found. I thank that doctor every day for what some would consider unnecessary tests.

Villages PL 10-22-2012 11:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shirleevee (Post 570192)
When we moved here, my husband went to a Cardiologist and told him of all his health issues. After taking a verbal history and noting that he is extremely active and eats clean, he said that he would like to do a stress test. That done, he said he wanted to do an Angiogram. Hubby had one the previous year and all was well.......but he had one and a 90% blockage was found. I thank that doctor every day for what some would consider unnecessary tests.

I see that in a previous post you indicated that heart disease was already well established. Therefore, that's not an example of something I would call, "unnecessary testing". I never said not to test patients who already have established heart disease.

thealex 11-05-2012 08:21 PM

I think that you have done the responsible thing in alerting readers about alleged fraudulent medical practice. I also think that Florida has some of the highest medical costs and the lowest health outcomes in the country. You really should identify this practice if for no other reason than to verify the truth of your post. I think it equally important that patients take responsibility for their own health and not just roll over for the doctor, especially once you've been alerted.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:16 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.