Question for Trump supporters?
 

Question for Trump supporters:

Is there anything Trump could do or say that would force you to change your mind and switch your support to Cruz? Proof he was a child molester? Proof he had no knowledge of geography, you know, like George Bush or Sarah Palin?

That's a great question. Trump says he could shoot somebody and not lose support.

Here's my question to Trum supporters:
Instead of a debate I would like to see the candidates sequestered. I would a group of professors from leading institutions to ask pointed questions about to discover the background knowledge on geography, economics, world events, history and opinions on court cases.
Next the candidates would read their essays out loud and everyone could download their answers.
We know how they think on their feet and see their oration skills. We need to know how smart they actually are.
Do you think Trump supporters would help support this new type of vetting?

The primary for Florida is already over. How can someone change now? Hint, I did not vote for Trump, Hillary or Sanders. But, when the general comes around in Nov, I'll be voting for whichever Republican candidate wins the nomination, or gets the nomination if the delegates make the decision. There is no way in bloody h3ll that I would vote for Hillary or Sanders. I would consider that to be treason.

I pushed enter too soon. I didn't proof read it very well. thanks for understanding
It would be interesting to see how the current and past presidents would do on these questions too.

So, what you want is to elect a professor as president. We already have a wannabe professor in there. A professor in claim only. And you don't have any problem with his geography knowledge. 57 States doesn't say much for his knowledge of our country. Of course, he seems to have a good grasp of the Muslim countries. That should tell you something.

Perhaps you would wish that a candidate first graduate from a presidential career course? The problem with that is that there is no such prerequisite in the Constitution stipulating these type of requirements. All you need to worry about is whether or not he gets enough electoral votes. It doesn't even have to be a popular vote majority.

Here's a question for you. What would it take for you to switch your support from Hillary? Would an indictment be enough? Would she have to be incarcerated? If she was found guilty of tax fraud, would that convince you?

Is there anything Trump could do or say that would force you to change your mind

the answer is no?

Is there anything Trump could do or say that would force you to change your mind

the answer is no?

Kind of hard to change your vote after already casting it. Of course, I am not a liberal so I am not allowed to vote twice.

Now you know that is not fair....and you are just poking a stick at the badger....right?
We all know that Sanders and for sure Clinton would fail.
We also know that Obama would not have made it to the nomination.

The choices these days are very simple.
If any voter wants the establishment, the beurocracy, the cronyism ejected from Washington it must start with electing a non political, non insider, anti establishment, non beholding person to be president.

All others are nothing more than a continuation of the cronyism and political beurocracy and bloat that is the establishment of today....that being both R & D.

So the choices shake out pretty simply given the above.

Tell you what, if you can find a liberal that does NOT believe in genderless bathrooms, then I will vote for them. If you can find me a liberal candidate that believes in balancing the budget, I will consider voting for them. If you can find me a liberal that believes that it is a good thing, not evil to be wealthy, then I will consider voting for them. And if you can find me a liberal that does not believe in man being the culprit in global warming, I will consider voting for them. Put all those traits together and you will have the perfect Democrat candidate.
Otherwise, I will continue to vote for the Republican and hope for the best.

Start a new thread and I'll answer your question.

Just yesterday Trump said he would consider using nuclear weapons against European countries and any woman who had an abortion should be charged with a crime. Is there any group of people he has not offended?

Does that mean you are open minded?

As far as the nuclear option he said that you should take nothing off the table, because circumstances can change drastically. OK I'll give him that. Concerning the abortion crime charge it was a huge blunder, and all the walking back can't undo the damage.

How about his suggestion that we help arm Japan and South Korea with nuclear weapons so they can defend themselves against North Korea !!

He also said he was against support from white supremacists. The follow up question was, are you saying you don't want their votes? His answer was "I don't want their votes. Besides I don't need their votes." Do votes matter more then convictions?

His opinion about white supremacy and abortion and a thousand other things can evolve over the years. But if it changes by the day, something is wrong.

Maybe that's the first thing you learn about politics. But he's not running for student council.

There you go..... a true Trump supporter. Do you know how educated people (even republican educated people) think you are a total idiot? Stop embarrassing yourself. It's sad.

Why not, Obama is helping to arm Iran?

Yes, a conviction or incarceration would make me switch my vote. However, you and I both know if Clinton is not indicted or incarcerated you'll make an excuse. (Obama is protecting her etc). You know, as I do, she's not going to be indicted but it'll not end there. Kind of like Bengazi, white water and all the other made up scandals republicans have come up with.

asdasdfasdf

This clown is as open minded as Fox News tells him to be.

Well put...today there was another Repub post saying Whitewater may be brought up yet again.

This will NEVER stop!

It is so obvious when some people are let out for thier daily airing!!

Hillary IS guilty regardless of the corrupt system that may allow her a pass. Anyone that has ever worked for the State Dept or even classified information, KNOWS that she is guilty. It is going to be interesting to see how many people that got fired for mishandling on a small degree turn around and sue the gov when she walks. They will all get back pay and their possible missed promotions. The gov will be paying out big bucks for letting her slide on her felonies. No one has ever been as guilty as her in blatantly mishandling and improperly destroying classified information. She may get off, but she is still guilty. And you can call it a Republican conspiracy all you want, but you will just be making a fool of yourself, because no one is going to believe her, unless they are total fools. Americans can be fooled by they are not stupid.

Same to you. You proved his/her point.

Some Americans are stupid. You just proved it.

Don't be so hard on yourself. After all, it's not your fault that you have no one else to support in your party, but a washed up old criminal, liar and thief. Remember, you still have that older perverted commie that you can fall back to, when Hilllary gets indicted.

Dear Guest: If your comments are meant to say that Obama's reference to 57 states was not a mistake you are correct. Where Obama went wrong was that he confused the United States with the 57 Arab States, something he would be more familiar.

For a law professor who studied Constitutional law you would believe he would show more reference toward the U.S.Constitution but instead he has repeatedly shown disrespect. I guess perhaps like many progressives indoctrinated in the liberal bastions we call Universities he too was taught to hate old white men.

I look forward to the Republican Convention because we are indeed living in a unique political period that is testing our legal and political systems. Let's be united in our desire that our fundamental laws prevail for the sake of all our futures

Personal Best Regards:

Great linking.

Huffington Post???? Ha, ha, ha, ha.......funny.

How many times has Clinton lied and liberals don't care or are in denial? We don't have enough space to list them all. Well, at least he hasn't yet put our national security at risk, left his employees to die, lie about it or steal gov property. We won't mention Clinton's being investigated for tax evasion, because we don't know about Trumps taxes yet. But, all in all, we know how the scale tips if we decide to compare flaws.

The Florida primary is already finished so if you are trying to convince someone not to vote for Trump, you are a bit late. If you are worried about the general election, then you might want to wait for the nominations before getting into a panic.

You don't get it do you?

He is practicing being a politician.

He will not live long enough to ever achieve a lying and deception rate of the likes of Clinton or Obama.

What does the source have to do with it? If Fox tells the facts then I am interested in what they have to report about. They do source these lies of Donald Trump and he does lie frequently with no thought of any consequences. I cannot think of ANY politician ever who has done this with such aplomb.

Trump doesn't lie. He just gives a different version of the truth.
All joking aside, he flies by the seat of his pants. In his mind, he probably thinks what he is saying is the truth. Every misstatement isn't a lie. Lie is a strong word, and everyone in the current state of politics is using it to discredit their opponent.

Sanders knows that the programs he is throwing out there will never become law. Does that make him a liar?

The same holds true with Trump's statement that he will deport all illegal aliens? That is not going to happen. So, he is lying!

Illegal aliens is no longer what they are. They are non-citizens. So, breaking the law isn't illegal.

The enemy of my enemy is my friend. Clinton is my enemy, therefore Trump will have to suffice. If he gets the nomination in spite of the RNC's attempt to keep that from happening, he will get my vote. After all, he will be fighting the establishment to the extent that it is practically a one man army fighting a Goliath of a political system. I don't like him, but he will do for four years. Much better than allowing our country to look bad by electing a criminal, liar and thief....Hillary.

Where you live there must be no external communications or live presentation of anything taking place in the world.

However if we take the statement as a compliment then perhaps it is a credible statement.

Trump does it with aplomb and the politicians just continually do it with reckless abandon and disrespect.

Says the guy about to be slaughtered...

You mean the propaganda put out by the media? You're LESS informed by watching their lies. You're being led...

Yes, of course. You must have quite an acid trip going there. Paranoid much?

Yes, I'm paranoid because I don't think the media is truthful.

Who cuts your meat?