trump the coward
 

He rants and raves about Mexico paying for the wall, but when he meets face to face with the Mexican President he is a wimp. He is a con man, what can you expect. Went there for religious pictures and came back with egg on his face. Caspar Milquetoast

I know it is hard for a liberal to think on their own, because it's too dangerous, but think about it a minute. It is not within Trump's authority to negotiate payment for a border wall right now. He is not a gov employee and does not have the power to negotiate or empower the building of a wall. He was smart NOT to discuss the financing of the wall that he PLANS to build IF he is elected. He would still need congress's approval to build the wall first. I realize that this may be confusing for you. You probably didn't read all of your talking points before spewing your confusion on here.

Trump ate Hillary's lunch by accepting the Mexican president's invitation. They discussed ideas, not negotiated contracts. Hillary was left eating Trump's dust while she was greedily begging or dealing for more funding. Trump is a doer. Hillary would rather someone else do everything for her. Typical liberal.

I laugh people really dont understand how he will make Mexico pay for a wall or anything for that matter. Think about it for a minute it will come to you .

it can be done with a tax or fee on each Western Union money transfer to Mexico & central America, billions of $$$ are sent every year.

Trump DID go to Mexico, Hillary did not!

She figures she has the latino vote locked up so why bother.

And typical of what we see here on this forum, when somebody says or does anything that is different from their view/stance/opinion, the first they do is whine about what the other person said or did or did not do.

Typical democrat?
You say up they say down.
You say down the say up.
You say up or down they say side ways!!!

No knowledge or understanding required.

Republicans can be pretty obtuse themselves.

And what is it with religion? I mean really? You believe all that 5000 year old crap?

I am a Democrat an I say NEVER HILLARY!

I'm ME and I'm not cattle or sheep...I'll vote for NEITHER of the crooks. The lesser of two evils is still evil.

So, eliminate the confusion, how will Trump ever get Congress to approve his wall? He said that he will start building the wall on day one of his presidency. So, he thinks that he has the power to do this.

When the gang of eight came up with their bipartisan immigration plan, it had to be comprehensive. The Democrats would never agree with a plan that had the wall being built first, because they knew there would never be a step two. Why would they do it now? Because Trump is Trump.

Trump is doer. Too funny. All he does is lie. He goes to Mexico, and acts presidential. He comes back to the US, and delivers a speech that only his alt right people agree with. His speech last night wasn't presidential. It was far from it. It was dictatorial. He performs for the audience that is in front of him. Saturday should be funny. Let's see if he gives a speech like the one in Bulworth.

Let's talk about coward......while Trump put his life on the line to go to Mexico to form a relationship with the country and its president, Killary was nowhere to be found even though she was invited to Mexico. Mr. trump was very smart in not talking about the wall or who's paying for it. You don't go to a foreign country for the first time and meet the president and start conversation with a bitter topic. Mr. Trump will form a relationship with Mexico's president and they will then talk about the wall.

Mr. Trump has shown his love for America and its citizens and is willing to risk his life to become president and do what's right for our country. On the other hand, Killary just sits back, continues to lie, lie, lie and dodge any questions regarding the boarder, ISIS, the deletion of 33,000+++ emails, why people around her are "mysteriously" dying, how she will fix healthcare, her declining health or the fraudulent Clinton Foundation. These are important issues the American people have the right to know about and SHE'S the coward for not talking about the issues. Watch Clinton Cash and Hillary's America and then tell me who the coward is.

He does,

it was approved by congress years ago just not followed thru

Another desperate and confused liberal. My, my, my!
Lies? I hear you make that statement, but I do not hear you give us his quoted lies from his speech. Trump ate Hillary's lunch and the polls are proving it. And Nov 8 will be the ultimate proof.

And Hillary had no time to travel to Mexico because she is in conference with her lawyers over how she is going to lie her way out of the latest scandal. How is she going to excuse sending classified emails on an unsecured, private Internet server, even AFTER leaving government employment. Her clearance was taken away from her when she left gov employment. I know, some libtard is going to throw out there that if she was guilty, she would have to be charged and convicted and no one has charged and convicted her. However, all of this evidence will eventually find the right person, at the right time, holding the right power to pursue justice and then she will be FRIED like a county fair corn dog.

He will, like Obama did, has done and will continue, to do or get what ever he needs without the approval of the congress.

Getting congressional approval is akin to speed limits.....most do what ever they can get away with.

Congress let Obama get away with it because he is black. They did not pursue impeachment because they knew there would be racial riots in D.C. like the ones of '68. Trump would not get away with what Obama has gotten away with, even if Trump wanted to. I doubt he would try.

Off the subject, but if Hillary was pres. and tried to circumvent congress, she would get slapped down also. Being a female will not help her because there is NO threat of rioting. No one would care about her being slammed.

All of this is political jabber.

Why all the fuss.....

Job loss in the USA is from losses to China plus technological changes. NAFTA losses have been extremely small.

He continues to wrap his rhetoric in fear and despair.

Vote for him, and your disappointment will actually be despair. And this is not partisan rhetoric from me....

I am a member of the GOP for 50 years. I am anti Obama policies and certainly anti Clinton.

Most importantly, everything I have said is verifiable, if you want to do that.

He is doing a con job, by scaring and playing on insecurities.

He will insure that the Democrats are stronger in places they were not.

He will help the Democrats to take over both the senate and the house.

He is playing on your fears. In the last week, he has supported Bush, Rubio and Obama on immigration. He will change on a dime.

"risen," says Harvard professor and trade expert Robert Lawrence. "In aggregate, the economy is close to full employment."

""History shows that trade made easy, affordable and fast...always begets more trade, more jobs, more prosperity," the founder and CEO of FedEx wrote in a recent Wall Street Journal op-ed.
Who's right? Take a look at what has happened to blue-collar workers.
Manufacturing jobs in the U.S. actually increased in the years after the North America Free Trade Agreement with Mexico and Canada went into effect in 1994.
But the story changed dramatically in 2000. Since then, the U.S. has shed 5 million manufacturing jobs, a fact opponents of free trade mention often."

"Trump and Bernie Sanders blame China for undercutting American workers with cheap labor (even Trump makes a lot of his suits and ties overseas). But there's another big factor: technology. Robots and machines are also replacing workers. The tech trend would have happened regardless of trade."

""Trump's talk on trade is bluster," says economist Charles Ballard of Michigan State University. "Even if you did [what Trump says], you wouldn't reverse the technology, which is a very big part of the picture."
Trump's threat to put hefty taxes on Chinese and Mexican goods coming into the country would likely to sink the economy into a recession. It would make many items at the store more expensive for working class Americans and spark a global trade war.
The U.S. tried this tactic in the 1930s with a law known as Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act. It backfired, pulling the U.S. further into the Great Depression."

U.S. has lost 5 million manufacturing jobs since 2000 - Mar. 29, 2016

you may want to consider expanding your sources

Trump needs 40% plus of the Hispanic vote to win the election. What did he say in his speech to attract Hispanics? He consistently polls in the teens with Hispanics and 2 or 3% with blacks.

He walked right into a trap. All Hillary has to do is replay his speech on a loop from now until Nov 8

People in trumps inner circle know that trump will make Mexico and offer they can't refuse.

That speech was part 1968 George Wallace and part 1930's Germany. He sure knows his audience.

I think you're no being truthful on either count.

Put his life on the line?? :1rotfl::1rotfl:

Pardon me, but you're in a fact-free zone once again.

it did take guts to go there.

where's fat butt Hellary

she wouldn't go to Mexico unless they donated to her Foundation

Actually, he does not need 40% of the Hispanic vote to win. But, keep throwing out those figures if you wish. Hillary is her own worst enemy, as is Trump. Difference is that Trump knows how to win by brute force. Hillary tries to win by hook or crook, mostly crook. But, her past is catching up with her and even her own party voters are abandoning her. Unlike the Republicans that say they won't vote for Trump, but will secretly, Hillary's supporters insist they will vote for her and won't. Hillary can't even get a couple hundred supporters to show up for her rallies. They had to pay people to fill up the seats at the DNC convention. SO pathetic and pitiful.

Trump will win by a landslide, due to non-participation of the left. Trump still has motivation. Hillary is starting to look haggard, more than usual. The stress is getting to her and she looks ill. Kaine, the clown will probably have to take over for her before long.

She's using her "fat butt" as an outdoor movie screen to make a few more bucks. Kind of like pedaling her behind...:yuck:

Since voter ID is not required, it's easy. The dead are voting for the left also.

Does he look like WC Fields?

And with homeland security (:1rotfl::1rotfl::1rotfl:) in charge of the election there will be plenty of lattitude and acceptable excuses for having voted more than once; plus any warm body of any age....or using their name.......

How can anybody with a brain NOT WANT voter registration along with voter ID?

That issue in and of itself should explain the loosey goosey election results......with an auto wave of the arm by homeland security.

Homeland security's other job, is to hold up and challenge any and all locations that are overwhelmingly Trump supported.

Re: Neither of the two crooks
 

I think we have all lost faith in our government.
We have just gone through OBAMA. While I did not vote for Obama, IT WOULD HAVE GIVEN ME PLEASURE TO SAY I WAS WRONG ABOUT HIM. Sadly, I was more right then I realized.

In the next election we will choose between Hillary an INSIDER, very skilled at working the system-the CLINTON GANG apparently getting away with yet another CRIME-RUNNING FOR AN ILLEGAL THIRD TERM and TRUMP essentially a FREE AGENT who refuses to be BOUGHT by people like SOROS, BUFFET, SAUDI ARABIA ETC ETC ETC ETC ETC ETC.

If, you refuse your duty to choose, others will make the choice. I suppose you can then claim if it like OBAMA works out to be a POOR CHOICE-that it was not your choice. I voted for Mccaine and in the second election I voted for Rhomney so I am free of BLAME but I still get to PAY for the results of the choice too many others made.

There is no illegal third term. Your parroting makes you look like a fool

What source would you trust ? Post a note on the sources you trust and I will do your research.

I might add two things. Do not list Fox or Breitbart ,

Secondly, all this pompous talk comes with a price tag, as he accuses everyone else of enlarging national debt.

"Trump laid out policy proposals Wednesday night, and for many of them, we can provide at least a rough estimate of the cost using a variety of sources. There are some programs, though, for which we don't have solid details or estimates.

According to the numbers we do have, Trump's plan would add $51.2 billion and $66.9 billion in immigration enforcement costs over the next five years."

Trump’s big immigration crackdown comes with big 5-year price tag: More than $50 billion - The Washington Post

The link supplies details, and if you don't like that number...there are higher cost reduction. I will be glad to research that for you.

This fantasy costs money

"Another recent estimate calculated that the cost of deportation would be disastrous for the US economy. According to the right-leaning American Action Forum, it would take between $400 billion and $600 billion to deport 11 million people without proper documentation over 20 years."

How much does Donald Trump's immigration plan cost? - Business Insider

I think you're mistaken. Trump is bought and paid for. Bought and paid for by Trump himself.

Beyond the cost, who is going to replace them? Restaurants, hotels, etc. would be in deep trouble. Think Las Vegas. Also who's going to replace the agricultural workers? Rather than running them out on a rail we'd be much better off giving them a chance to become citizens through a controlled amnesty program.

Gee...that sounds familiar.

Of course Trump made fun of it, the people who proposed it, AND their family.

I am not a liberal, and I am mot confused.

At the beginning of the speech, he stated Obama has an open border policy. Later, he stated that Obama, and Clinton had a catch and release policy on the border. Obama has deported more illegals than every other president. Most of these were either caught or turned themselves at the border. Trump praised Obama for this, and he said he would continue that policy. trump isn't lying. He is just talking out of both sides of his mouth at the same time.

He stated that illegals cost 113 billion a year. This number comes from a conservative group. Trump stating it as fact is a lie. It isn't a fact. Illegal Immigrants Cost U.S. $100 Billion per Year, Conservative Group Says About Illegal Immigration - ABC News

"Illegals workers draw much more out from the system than they can ever possibly pay back." Again, read the article above, and look at the jobs that work at. They are the bottom of the totem pole. Alabama put in tough immigration laws, and it also put the farmers out of business. No one wanted to do the work of picking fruit/vegetables/ etc. The crops died.

"They are treated better than vets." That is total nonsense.

He stated that 2 million were criminals. The estimates are between 600,000 and 2,000,000. are criminals. An honest person would used some number in the middle.

He has made the wall and Mexico paying for it as his signature policy. The previous Mexican president, and the current one have both stated that Mexico will not pay for the wall.

I could go on and on, but it would fall on deaf ears. So, I am not going to waste any more of my time. Besides, reading his speech really or what past for a speech