![]() |
Julian Assange
"Clinton tried to destroy us, yet she destroyed herself."
Clinton, Podesta et al COULD NOT HANDLE THE TRUTH & they brought it on themselves. He will be a part of American History as the "non-Russian" that blew up the Clinton Dynasty I ask; Why Bill Clinton Rushed to Loretta Lynch after #WIKILEAKS revealed the #ClintonCorruption BClinton lost nuclear codes, Hillary gave TOP SECRET response time on TV (felony), Biden identified soldier who carried codes. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C0ZsBMXWgAERdlJ.jpg |
Although I like the fact that Assange exposed the Clintons and their supporters for what they are, I find it a bit disconcerting tat someone could possibly get a hold of sone of out top secret classified information with no accountability.
I fear that Mr Assange has become or will become too powerful and want to rule the world. |
So the Dems spent 1.3 Billion on their campaign, but were to cheap or stupid to have first class firewall built to protect their emails.
The Rep didn't get broken/hacked into, guess they know how to built a better mouse trap. Imagine if those emails weren't exposed what the public would never know. remember one thing if nothing else Clinton or Podesda NEVER denied the contents :mad: How's Bernie feel'n the burn or Debbie Wassermam |
Quote:
"“Whatever the cost of our libraries, the price is cheap compared to that of an ignorant nation.” ― Walter Cronkite |
Quote:
However what I find even more troubling is that outside hackers seem to be the only people who make the wrong doing of our national leaders public. Where are the Bernsteins and Woodwards The news media's function is to be truth tellers, fact finders irrespective of party religion etc. However they are heavily biased on the left, some misinforming, others not informing at all while others making stories up as they go along. Fact checking is a joke because we need fact checkers to check fact checkers who in turn need fact checkers...... And as to this forum we have posters who actually are holding other posters to a higher standard of accuracy than they require from or receive from their news sources of current events. Its insane Personal Best Regards: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Hope Santa brought you a very large box of crayons . |
Quote:
CNN was totally silent other MSM outlets spent under a minute or two in hour of televised time. I think Fox was the only one reporting (maybe that's why they are #1) |
Quote:
Please supply some sort of credence to your claim about MSM spending so little time on the leaks. I ABSOLUTELY AND TOTALLY disagree with you in every aspect of your post and submit you simply made it up. |
Quote:
Since then every single person who writes for even a weekly advertiser has been attempting to fashion themselves as the next coming of those two . Just because they fell into a lucky break over four decades ago does not qualify them to be listened to are heralded today . By the way Bernstein has not really been heard from since . It is Bob Woodward who has continued to publish and appear as a contributor on ------ get ready ------ OH MY God ! -- He appears on FOX NEWS ! |
Quote:
U disagree with everything I post. :22yikes: It was reported on Fox every few days with time charts and all. It was on numerous Twitter feeds. |
Quote:
While you did not mention me by name, I am making as assumption that this comment was aimed at me.... "And as to this forum we have posters who actually are holding other posters to a higher standard of accuracy than they require from or receive from their news sources of current events. Its insane" I can tell you that anything I post has been at least triple checked. I actually mean I check at least three separate sources AND THE SOURCE it self before posting it. I posted a number of links on here today about the possibility and discussion on the appointment of the Dept HHS (Price) and the medicaire situation. The responss ignored those links totally with no comment. I do not give any wishy washy links and if I do and am called on it, I will come on here and apologize. I have even apologized in advance if my source was good but not great. I also never ever steal their words and use as mine. I always cut and paste so that you and others can read it in context. Perhaps you and I have different aims on this forum and in life. My aim is to learn and share...FACTS. Not to simply sign on and attack the side I do not normally agree with, first because I know that neither conservative nor liberal is 100% right. Second, the continuation of that simply adds to the divide in this country. I prefer to share what I find and my opinion on that. Here is the problem. I try to share and then get back a reply simply aimed to denegrate a person or trump up Trump, or deenegrate a movement, right or left. That serves NO purpose. What did you learn ? It appears you come on here first and foremost to preach your gospel which is so predictable. You hate liberals, and it appears all of them. You hate President Obama on all issues and all problems should be laid at his feet. You did not support Trump to start but have come to realize he is so smart and brilliant and he is manipulating the left. You attach terrible motives to anyone who opposes Trumps lies. You find all he says to be true and the "holy grail" I am sorry...I am simply pleading, NOT for universal agreement on issues, but at least discussing THE issue and how you feel about it without the constant pics and name calling. I have been, and hate to admit it, out of anger retorting to some of that because if flies in the face of adult conversation. i am a conservative and the conservatives on here are becoming so infantile, proclaiming victory, admonishing all on the left as "whatever the word of the day might be" and making stuff up. Come on, you told us that Obama moved in two blocks from the WH so he could keep after Trump even though factually, he moved in to that house many months ago. Yet you attached this motive to it because you do not like Obama. If you can attach a factual issue to that move, so be it, but to make one up....come on. |
Quote:
You said.... "CNN was totally silent other MSM outlets spent under a minute or two in hour of televised time. I think Fox was the only one reporting (maybe that's why they are #1)" That is a lie and I know it to be a lie. That is why it is easy to call you out. There is enough truth out there....try that for a bit. |
In your opinion.
It's not a lie, it's what I saw. You saw what you saw. Do you think you're being graded on accuracy here, chill out. you moved into a repub community. you take these posts and forum waaaay to serious. Oh I know you don't like the pics I post, sorry not your choice. They add to the clarity of the subject unless they are simply humorous. we R here to have fun you know |
Quote:
Obviously on this comment, you just flat out do not care about it. I also am more aware you will ever be of what kind of community i live in and I, more than you ever will understand, know the political leaning. But, it is basically an HONEST community that does grade themselves on accuracy. |
Quote:
So enjoy your self, but memory serves me that they have lots of fun in GIRL TALK also |
Quote:
this took 30 seconds to find (want more?) Friday evening, October 7, to Thursday morning, October 13, the morning and evening news shows on ABC, CBS and NBC spent 4 hours and 13 minutes reporting on accusations against Donald Trump for sexual harassment and/or assault, while the revelations from Wikileaks regarding Hillary Clinton’s staff’s emails received coverage for a paltry 36 minutes. That’s literally a 7-to-1 ratio. ournalists quick to be critical of Trump dismissed the entirety of the email leak as a “distraction” (Nancy Cordes, CBS This Morning on October 13) with “no major bombshells” (Kasie Hunt, NBC’s Today on October 8). CBS This Morning on October 13 even invited on New York Times correspondent Mark Leibovich to talk about the leaked emails, -- a reporter who himself was featured in the leaked emails for having Hillary Clinton approve one of his stories about her. Yet not a single CBS “journalist” even mentioned this huge potential conflict of interest. How Much Does The Media Cover Trump vs. Wikileaks? This Number Is AMAZING | Daily Wire also Will Mainstream Media Cover Wikileaks Data Dump? - YouTube Me think you set the ignore button on fox news :22yikes: |
Quote:
I just assumed you knew the difference between BROADCAST NEWS and CABLE NEWS. I suspect you should look into that before posting on this again because you just look more ignorant than I thought. The differences between the two are HUGE and you referenced in your original post CABLE NEW CHANNELS, which incorporate more "shows" than news and must fill 24 hours a day. BROADCAST NEWS, by the way is limited in time and scope 5 days a week. AS FOR Fox reference you made, I find that humurous. Back in 2008 when I was posting under either Bucco or Rags123 I was accosted and told I watched too much Fox.....I was brainwashed, thus your comments made me smile |
If I made you smile U made my day.
Be well, Happy New Year |
Quote:
Just assuming people know things is a mistake. BROADCAST NEWS.....limited in time and scope CABLE NEWS CHANNELS......24/7 365 |
Quote:
Personal Best Regards: |
Quote:
No good. You, in your posting have made things up, flat out lied, and plagiarized thus your credibility is zero. Please ask me to prove that. On the subject, neither you or anyone can make that claim. I certainly can accept that Fox covered it more than anyone. (Cannot recall how many shows Hannity dedicated to it) but the other crap is just that..political made up crap. |
do U find a need to respond to every post?
If you don't fell a persons post is credible IYHO, just ignore it. You're being ridiculous. |
Quote:
You think that a poster should be able to lie, post fake news, plagiarize and refuse to link to his/her sources...without being called on it? :1rotfl: On second thought...I'll bet that's exactly what you would like. Then, only right-wing zealots...would be posting in this forum. :wave: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Seems to be many on this site who suddenly are accusing everyone else of plagiarizing . |
Where Do These Jerks Hail From?
Quote:
You offer no meaningful and positive contribution on these pages There isn't an alphabet station that has any credibility. My time is too valuable so in the future my only response to disagreeable and inane posters like you is going to be okey dokey okey dokey Personal Best regards: |
Quote:
Thanks for playing. :wave: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Your attempt at being civil is respected, and I have attempted to copy that on many occasions, to no avail. Some folks, usually trolls persist in agitating in their misery. Posting can be civil but I doubt you will ever hear a political opinion based solely on fact. Where do you get such facts, from the news? What makes that accurate? This is a discussion. Someone presents a point and others discuss it. Have a great day, Rocky......even if you are not a real conservative....;^) |
In line with the comparisons between Jim Jones and Donald Trump, be aware that his followers will believe anything obviously.
"Nearly half of all Donald Trump voters believe a widely debunked conspiracy theory claiming that Hillary Clinton is involved in a child sex ring run out of a popular Washington, D.C. pizzeria, a recent poll suggests." Nearly 50% of Trump fans believe Clinton's involved in pedophilia - NY Daily News And his messengers of lies are with him in the oval office.. "The retired general whom President-elect Donald Trump chose to advise him on matters of national security has urged Americans to learn about child sex crimes and money laundering allegedly committed by Hillary Clinton." Trump's National Security Adviser: "Clinton Child Sex Crimes Are Real" Should you not like the source....in the link are two actual tweets from Flynn.....and "Flynn later tweeted a link to the Breitbart website on November 4. The article to which he linked quoted former Blackwater CEO Erik Prince, who said that during the Anthony Weiner investigation, “They found State Department emails. They found a lot of other really damning criminal information, including money laundering, including the fact that Hillary went to this sex island with convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Bill Clinton went there more than 20 times. Hillary Clinton went there at least six times.“ Flynn tweeted the article with the hashtag #SpiritCooking — a reference to occult practices revealed in a WikiLeaks email from Clinton campaign manager John Podesta." |
The above post given that each day, it seems, Trump seems to simply lie and lie......let us hope we hear the truth just one day.
"In a pair of tweets Monday night, Donald Trump laid out some bold and highly dishonest claims about his foundation, claiming “100% of money goes to wonderful charities!” His foundation was ordered to stop fundraising in October as a result of an investigation by the State of New York. In fact, it has been obvious for awhile that Donald Trump’s foundation is guilty of doing exactly what he had accused the Clinton Foundation of doing, which makes his ridiculous tweets even more laughable:" Trump Ridiculously Claims Every Penny Raised by Foundation Goes to Charity "President-elect Donald Trump made the dubious claim on Twitter late Monday night that his foundation pays zero expenses and donates all of its money to charity. " Donald Trump Claims 100 Percent Of His Foundation's Money Goes To Charity. That's A Lie. | The Huffington Post Even Fox alludes, SOFTLY, to his lies... Trump to Dissolve Foundation | Fox Business So...bottom line, he lies and you believe him when he lies and he does it now on a daily basis....of course NEVER a press conference to answer questions. Yet, you attack others....simply mind boggling. |
Quote:
Twisting facts to give another meaning is done intenionally....accusing Obama of moving two blocks from the WH to simply attack Trump....when it was publicly announced he made this decision TWO months prior and simply for schooling for child. Ignoring lies and actually fostering them is lying unto itself. Yep, people make mistakes but most can tell the difference between a mistake and something done on purpose. Internet makes it very easy to double and triple check before attacking. |
Seems like the thread has definitely moved from the subject Julian Assange. Oh well, lets talk about Obama's move down the street from the White House instead.
|
Quote:
From MAY "President Barack Obama will lease a home in Washington, D.C.'s Kalorama neighborhood after he leaves the White House next year, CNN has confirmed." Peek inside Obama's new house - CNNPolitics.com |
QUESTION FOR MDLNB......
If I misjudge I am sorry, but it appears to me...well, here is the question... Does the truth mean anything to you or are you simply interested in trashing anyone and everyone who finds Trumps lies ? |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:59 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by
DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.