Originally Posted by coleprice (Post 2135635)

You are legally correct, but Morally and Ethically WRONG. I would never visit a business that conducted themselves this way. The Original Poster of this thread should let Villagers know the name of the restaurant so that other people can avoid this unscrupulous business. BTW, since the food servers are aware of that the owner overcharges its patrons, they should let patrons know . . . Otherwise, they are in cahoots with them. Nobody reads "fine print" on a busy menu!

Originally Posted by retiredguy123 (Post 2135684)

I agree. And, if the servers are not accountable for anything, they should be replaced with a touch screen.

Originally Posted by golfing eagles (Post 2135690)

Interesting concept. But how does a touch screen bring your food from the kitchen to your table??????:1rotfl::1rotfl::1rotfl:

Originally Posted by Bill14564 (Post 2135656)

Seriously?!!
And as for reading the fine print.... this is the same argument people use when complaining about deed restrictions. If you don't read the information presented to you then you have no one to blame for a misunderstanding.

Originally Posted by golfing eagles (Post 2135657)

Yep, just go on believing that. I have a bridge to sell you, very cheap.

Originally Posted by golfing eagles (Post 2135690)

Interesting concept. But how does a touch screen bring your food from the kitchen to your table??????:1rotfl::1rotfl::1rotfl:

Originally Posted by golfing eagles (Post 2135690)

Interesting concept. But how does a touch screen bring your food from the kitchen to your table??????:1rotfl::1rotfl::1rotfl:

Originally Posted by Bill14564 (Post 2135656)

Seriously?!!

When did it become Morally and Ethically WRONG to expect the customer to read the information that was presented to them? If the information was hidden in some way or presented in a deceptive way then I might agree but that was not how it was explained.

And as for reading the fine print.... this is the same argument people use when complaining about deed restrictions. If you don't read the information presented to you then you have no one to blame for a misunderstanding.

I am not a fan of "due to _____ actual prices may be higher than what is posted on the menu." I understand why businesses might choose to do this but I don't like it and I tend to not go back to those businesses. And not presenting a written bill and not accepting credit cards while still being able to text my bill through Square will definitely keep me from coming back. But Morally and Ethically WRONG? That's quite a bit of a stretch.

Originally Posted by golfing eagles (Post 2135690)

Interesting concept. But how does a touch screen bring your food from the kitchen to your table??????:1rotfl::1rotfl::1rotfl:

Originally Posted by retiredguy123 (Post 2135629)

I agree that the quality of the food is not the server's responsibility. But, the server expects you to pay them a tip based on 20 percent of the bill, which is a significant amount. .

Originally Posted by retiredguy123 (Post 2135725)

"Not how it was explained?" Did you read the original post? Half of the post was about being deceived about the prices, and, in bold print, the OP said:

Surprise: amounts on the bill did not agree with amounts shown on the menu!

Originally Posted by mgkw1 (Post 2135743)

Rae Raes is filthy and will never eat there again

Originally Posted by GATORBILL66 (Post 2135739)

Probably never happened or OP would have named the restaurant. Seems funny that no one else on here has even seen the "CASH ONLY" sign. Must of had a bad experience somewhere, probably not even in the villages.