It really helps if people...actually read the link. :oops:

Not only do people not read, I thought it interesting, as wrong as the thread title was, the need to use skin color shows there are serious defecinies in this identyfing others.....gotta know the skin color, place of origin, or religion. You know the important traits. Pervert, etc are just non serious titles to use

It's truth and fact that a black actress will be playing the new 007. It's all over the media also. I thought you were one not to leave out the facts? No it doesn't matter, and personally I don't give 2 .....s
I stated above it's the end of the Bond brand. There will only be one Bond...James Bond 007.

One Bond, represented by 9 different actors so far, none of whom looked like the others.

So now there'll be another Bond. Except the writers won't pretend that it's the same man, played by different actors who don't look alike at all. This time, it'll be a different Bond, who isn't trying to look like the others.

I'm fine with that.

It's not another James Bond, it's a new 007.
Steve

That would be a nice change. And maybe he will use 001! 001 does not sound as cool as 007, though.

Sean Connery's Top 4 Bond Moments - YouTube

Still think Sean Connery was the best Bond... James Bond.

I second that emotion! I was 12 years old when my father took me to see Goldfinger, that hooked me on Sean Connery as Mr. Bond, Mr. James Bond. :bigbow:

A black James West and female Ghostbusters. We can handle it (might be better than some of the Bond clunkers). Remember little Jimmy Bond?

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Woweeeee.

The female Ghostbusters movie was pretty bad.

So was the Wild Wild West remake.


Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Agreed! We started with him and once he wasn't doing it anymore, it just didn't seem the same. Change isn't always the best for certain things.

The Villages may not be their most lucrative market!

There you go again, confusing the issue with facts!