Originally Posted by Laker14
(Post 2087454)
Cincinnatians of my generation will remember this: The AM station that focused on Top 40 stuff was WSAI, and there were a couple of other AM stations that were focused more on our parents' tastes, one was WKRC, and WCKY was another. Occasionally a very few songs would cross over. Dean Martin's "Everybody Loves Somebody" was one that crossed one way, and Don McClean's "American Pie" crossed over the other way.
Consequently, my parents who listened to the stations focused on them, never got the difference between the 1910 Fruitgum Company, and The Rolling Stones. They didn't know, they didn't care, they just wanted us to turn the radio down, so they could hear Perry Como better on their record player.
Whether you call RAP music or not, it's just an expression that reflects generational and social mores. In the late 60s a lot of enduring songs were written and played, depicting and encouraging public protest over the war in Viet Nam. Now THAT was an issue for our parents.
First of all, they were aghast that this "new generation" would have the nerve to protest what their government had decided was the best course of action, and secondly, that they would call it "music", when it had a beat, a rhythm, and lyrics like nothing they'd grown up with, and had come to appreciate as worth listening to.
I remember Jack Parr and Steve Allen on TV actually making sarcastic fun of the sound and lyrics to songs we now consider mainstream and hear over the speakers as we walk around the squares of TV.
Does our parents' treatment of the music of the 50s and 60s not bear some resemblance to our generation's (especially if we happen to be white) treatment of RAP?
|