|
Quote:
Cannabis is not just a smoked substance, it is also infused into edibles and tinctures, no smoke necessary at all. There are already local rules and laws regarding smoking. It doesn't matter WHAT is being smoked, and there's nothing stopping localities from adding stricter prohibitions for smoking products with THC in them. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Most pro-choice advocates (such as myself) are not looking for restrictions. In the State of Florida, there were exactly ZERO abortions performed on women in their third trimester for the years that Roe v. Wade was active. Most women in their 3rd trimester would more likely undergo a cesarean birth if medically safe for the woman, as long as the fetus was still viable. If the fetus isn't viable by the third trimester, then it doesn't matter how it's removed from the womb, it's not viable and is either already dead, or will die shortly after it's born. Women in their 3rd trimester - are in that 3rd trimester because they have CHOSEN to have their babies. They have chosen to NOT get an abortion. If they're in the 3rd trimester and end up needing an abortion, it's because their life is in danger if they don't. I'm 100% in favor of saving the mother and sacrificing the unborn. That's how I was raised, my religion (Judaism) actually demands it. You always try to save the unborn. UNLESS the mother's life is in danger. Then you save the mother. Why? Because the mother has already proven that she can reproduce. The unborn has proven only that it has the potential to kill the fertile mother. |
Quote:
As soon as the heartbeat starts at 6 weeks - if the woman doesn't want to be pregnant anymore, do a c-section on her and take the fetus out. You can put it up for adoptions and grow it in an incubator, courtesy of the taxpayer of course (since the woman has already said she doesn't want it and you shouldn't be forcing her to keep it). Problem solved. Of course, it's not until 17-20 weeks that a fetus heart has all 4 chambers and is fully developed. Until then it's just a fluttering of cells, and not an actual heart yet. But hey, science amirite? |
Quote:
|
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
Quote:
Will talk slower. No one is arguing when mommy's life is at risk. Yes Amber died after taking an abortion pill. |
Quote:
You are creating your own definition, Not talking 6 weeks. :ohdear: |
Quote:
Not my definition, that's Florida's definition. Florida says it's a baby once you can hear the heart beat, at 6 weeks. So I say - let any woman who doesn't want the baby after 6 weeks, have the baby safely removed from her womb. The problem with this logic - is that it's not logical. The 6 week abortion ban is religious horsecrap that has no basis in science. If it was a baby at 6 weeks, then a woman should be able to GIVE BIRTH to it. Induce labor and let the 6-week old "baby" be born. If you can't do that, then maybe - it's not a baby yet, and you're not killing an unborn baby when you have an abortion at 7 weeks, or 8, 9, even as late as 17 weeks. You're removing a fetus - a combination of cells growing inside a female person, that is 100% dependent on that person. It cannot survive outside the person. It can't breathe on its own, its brain can't yet function, its digestive system is not yet functioning, it can't eat, it can't drink. Until such time as it can be BORN - it is a growth. Nothing more or less. |
No to abortion EVER unless mother's life is endangered.
No to Beavis and Butthead pot smokers. Go to Denver for your spring break. We don't need all that extra crap on our beaches. We have enough problems with alcohol abusers on our roads and beaches and creating problems. |
If proposition 4 passes, why should taxpayers be the ones footing the bill for this to be done?
|
Question is, how is this whole post even allowed on here? Since it’s a very political subject, at a minimum?
|
Thank you. I absolutely agree. Let police (and parents) do their jobs. Not in favor of most amendments introduced. Look at Colorado and California. Don’t want it.
|
Agree 100%
Quote:
|
I’m 78 and can probably count the number of elections I didn’t vote in on one hand. Having seen hundreds and hundreds of amendments it seems that the longer confusing ones it’s always good to vote against them. Someone is usually trying to put something over on you. When something is bad for you and they are telling you it’s good something is going on.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:42 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by
DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.