Originally Posted by banjobob (Post 1797063)

The Developer is responsible for young permanent residents ,but refuses to enforce the covenant disallowing it.

Originally Posted by manaboutown (Post 1796579)

That is my take on it. She knowingly has been breaking the law, deed restriction or covenants, whatever applies.

"While The Villages is a 55+ active adult community we welcome children and grandchildren. In fact we offer (year round) intergenerational activities called “Camp Villages”, allowing grandparents and grandchildren to experience together all the lifestyle The Villages has to offer. There is a 30 consecutive day limit for visitors under the age of 18."

from. FAQ | The Villages

Housing for Older Persons Act - Wikipedia

Originally Posted by hardwick2112@yahoo.com (Post 1796793)

Let's face it, The Villages is not what it used to be. Greed and money have taken over the developers mindset.

Originally Posted by manaboutown (Post 1796510)

18 years old Kelvin William Moore resides in Fenney with his 54 year old mother whom he criminally battered. He was arrested according to the unmentionable on-line news.

With all the hubbub over a little white cross in one's yard or a great looking $4,000 artificial turf front lawn one would think that whatever authority is responsible should be policing the 19 and over age restriction.

Originally Posted by vintageogauge (Post 1797104)

And you wonder why the positive cases are going up.

Originally Posted by Jayhawk (Post 1796568)

Maybe the rule breaker (mom) lied about having an under 19. How is that "all about the money"?

Originally Posted by Northwoods (Post 1797349)

The Developer has NOTHING to do with any household or rules north of Hwy 44. Well... unless those people are living on a championship golf course. Or living at The Daily Sun.

Originally Posted by JoMar (Post 1797284)

And you know that how?

Originally Posted by dewilson58 (Post 1796575)

Nothing in the requirements regarding the age of homeowner children in order to own property.

Originally Posted by dewilson58 (Post 1796576)

Having a young child is not an issue.

Originally Posted by vintageogauge (Post 1796606)

It doesn't say she owns the villa, she may well be a tenant and the owner didn't give a crap about the restrictions.

Originally Posted by billethkid (Post 1796623)

How does one or how did one find out the ages of people in a given house?

Originally Posted by Choro&Swing (Post 1796788)

If children live with their parents or grandparents who own or rent in The Villages, then they aren’t visitors, so the thirty day restriction doesn’t apply. It would apply if, say, people send their kids to The Villages to spend the summer with the grandparents. That’s not allowed beyond thirty days. A huge number of Villagers have grandchildren, and of course they want to be visited. This is why some of the swimming pools here are open to children. What joy to watch kids frolicking in a pool. It brings back old memories. There must be a number of kids who live here all the time, as there are schools here.

I’ve noticed that a large percentage of the crime by people residing in The Villages is done by children of Villagers—but usually grown-up children. Some grown-up children live with a parent to provide care—what a blessing! Some have medical problems that keep them from being able to live alone, such as Down Syndrome. Some move in because they have a hard time holding down a job for various reasons (including drug abuse and drinking problems and a criminal record) and need a place to stay. Sometimes they abuse the parent, and of course plenty of older parents are pretty abusive themselves, at least verbally. I’m sure it must be horrible for owners to have criminal children living with them. They need our support.

Originally Posted by Topspinmo (Post 1797859)

BS,

Originally Posted by retiredguy123 (Post 1797078)

I think he is 8, and has been living here since he was born.