Why do you care?

My understanding is that when the developer applies for the permits to build age restricted houses or apartments or townhouses the law states that a certain percentage of the homes within that division can be sold or even rented by an owner to people under 55. If the gestapo neighbors are going to go after people for what they believe are sins against the covenant, perhaps we should all chip in and provide these busybodies with uniforms so we all know them by sight if not by name.

False

Who makes money on Camp Villages??

Share your concerns here:

VCDD District Property Management

Where did you read that?

There is nowhere you disclose who is living in your house when you Buy.

Here are the rules, straight from the government. All residents status are reviewed every two years.

The Fair Housing Act: Housing for Older Persons | HUD.gov / U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)


There are so many posts on this thread by people who are anti-developer. I think some don't live here and are jealous and I think some have other agendas that are not in line with this very successful and enjoyable place to live.

There is NO shame in making money . There is no shame in running a community well...........................AND we get a nice life for our money here.

The rule plainly states that no one can have visitors under the age of 19 for more than thirty days in a year. Obviously, many don't follow that rule and I doubt anyone cares. Most of us love kids.

The age is 19 , no person under the age of 19 can live here look it up villages age rules

You have to be 19 to live here.

Here are the rules;

The Fair Housing Act: Housing for Older Persons | HUD.gov / U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)

Wrong.


You can live here, just not more than 30 days.

you would be surprised how many parents and grandparents allow this .. if the young person is responsible and is helping the parent or grandparent.. but this person needs to go.. before he causes more issues..

We have a 10 yr old in our neighborhood living with his grandfather. Nobody objected to the child but his mom was a piece of work. So there were complaints. As an "inside" complaint it was the developer's responsibility to handle. The developer sent a letter. No further action was taken.

It's just like the artificial lawn, another resident would have to file a complaint before any action would take place. Considering he was an 18 year old that could beat up his mom, he probably was a bigger guy, probably drove a car, and who at our age can tell an 18 year old from a 19 year old. If he's not causing trouble in the neighbor, people generally don't complain.

I played golf with a fellow who said he had two houses, one in TV and one in Parkside. I asked, why have a second home so close to TV. He said his 19 year old daughter came home to live, she was pregnant. So even though she was legal, he knew soon she would have a baby and wanted to do things the right way, so he bought a second home outside TV and he kept his other home so he could play golf.

Was this the much hyped case last year in the historical area? Where the daughter moved in and he couldn't get her out and finally she was arrested for something and he had the child?

The developer cannot evict someone from their own property. They can fine someone for deed restrictions. And they do. And then when the owners try to sell the property, there are liens on it if they don't pay the fines. They are fined for every single day they are out of compliance....