You might have included; the original post that I replied to for context. Since you missed it, here it is:

Originally Posted by John41

the developer sold them the house knowing that 20 percent can be under 55 just to make a quick buck. greed

my understanding is 20% of purchasers. When we bought, I inquired that, if both my husband and I died before our girls turned 55yrs, could they inherit the house, or would it have to be sold. I was told that they could inherit it, but couldn't live in it, as long as any of their children were under 19yrs old. They could down for under 30days, twice a year, in order to handle any maintenance issues' Perhaps this kid doesn't have a Villages ID (or, as stated before, someone lied) so flying under the radar.

So, did you know they could or could not come visit? Seemed like a perfect place....so do they come or do they not?

This post needs some clarification..

So who made the call? Do you know? Probably nobody made the call so the neighborhood was ok with it. This isn't that difficult to understand process, the difficulty is someone picking up the phone.

There is a process.....how long ago was the letter? If not satisfied pick up the phone. Can't be much of an issue if nobody follows up.

And you know that how?

There is no way that the 30 day limit can be enforced. How does anyone know it the kid left and came back, starting again? There’s no proof to outsiders what’s going on inside, other than the incident mentioned here. There was a similar situation where I used to live. They were unable to do anything about it unless there was proof that the 17 year old was living there permanently. The kid even did damage to the community and they still couldn’t just kick him out. People complained all the time. Eventually the son started living with a girl and got her pregnant. He broke up with her, but after the baby was born it looked like the infant was living there with the boys mother. There was no proof of that either. Even with neighbors’ complaints, all they could do was ask her. She said she was babysitting, but the baby was only occasionally taken somewhere by it’s mother, then always returned to the house, not to be seen again until the next morning.

Internal (inside the home) deed restrictions are rarely enforced. Just look at the number of AIRBNB's being operated in the Villages where someone living in the home rents out a room while they are living in the home. This violates two deed restrictions, the residence is not being used as a single family residence and there is a business being operated out of the home. If this can not be enforced while the violation is in plain sight (just look up the AIRBNB listings), don't expect a 30 day limit on people under 19 years old to be enforced.

It will take 32 years to have this rule enforced
Then he will be old enough to stay

The Developer has NOTHING to do with any household or rules north of Hwy 44. Well... unless those people are living on a championship golf course. Or living at The Daily Sun.

The way this works in The Villages you would have to be the one to police it.

just to ease your mind, none of us are sick, were sick, etc. ..we don't have the virus, or know anyone who does. oxo

Maybe they didn’t bother to ask questions other than if she’s got the means to pay?

Daa, this in the NEW section selling NEW houses, it’s not in calumet grove where new house were sold 20 years ago.

They set up the rules and claim restricted retirement community.