Somehow, I don't feel badly for insurance companies. Their primary interest is their bottom line and shareholders. Homeowners and policies are basically the food supply.

While I really like the concept of the Roof Maxx product,
if the insurance companies will not recognize the value and a homeowner is required to replace the roof anyway, what's the cost-benefit?

Remember "those big, bad insurance companies"? I'm insurance poor.

Over the long haul, insurance waste of money, you pay for people living in flood plains, on coast, knowing it going to flood and hurricane going to hit, which shouldn’t be building there anyway. Then, the fine print getting them out of paying if natural disasters occur. O wait read find print they don’t cover earthquakes, sinkholes, which natural disaster... or perfectly good old roofs now.

Read the warranty
 

It only gives you warranty for defective shingle not wear and tear.