jimjamuser |
11-13-2020 04:12 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Byte1
(Post 1860413)
That's not even a valid argument.
Abortion is about killing a living being for the convenience of the host, almost 98% of the time. That has nothing to do with the mask and the virus though.
How is being forced to wear a mask in public, protecting the public? If you are not infected, then the mask is doing nothing. If you are able to avoid infection, then it is up to you to avoid it, not someone else that YOU deem a possible carrier. You have no scientific evidence to prove that anyone is threatening your health by not wearing a mask. If you do not wish contamination, infection then it is up to you to protect yourself. If a person has a bleeding ailment (Hemophilia) do you have the right to demand that knives and forks not be used in restaurants? Is it up to others to carry bandages for you, just in case they happen to be around someone with that ailment?
Sounds hokey? Same as your comparison that has nothing to do with the subject.
|
When you say," no scientific evidence that a person without a mask is threatening another person's health". Yes, there is. Go on Youtube and watch the droplets spread by just breathing both with and without a mask. That is an experiment that anyone can see with their own eyes (or lying eyes). That spread is a distance of about 6 ft. Also, when unmasked people sneeze, the droplets go 15 feet. That IS evidence, OK. And many other items in that post are false. I don't have enough time to go through them all.
|