Talk of The Villages Florida

Talk of The Villages Florida (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/)
-   The Villages, Florida, General Discussion (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-general-discussion-73/)
-   -   To be or not to be-TV Antennas installed outside (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-general-discussion-73/not-tv-antennas-installed-outside-148753/)

Chellybean 04-14-2015 03:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JoMar (Post 1044889)
Ok....except this developer and District can take you to court to the extent of having you removed from TV, which they have done. So the deed restrictions enjoy the force of law. Of course if you want to test them, please do.

p.s. OMG they can not have you removed from the TV for a deed restriction, where in GODS name do you get your information.
PLEASE let them try that with me i welcome it, i would end up owning a good chunk of the Villages.
Have a good day and have a beer on me.

Chellybean 04-14-2015 03:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by looneycat (Post 1044831)
A Deed Restriction is a contract and subject to the law of contracts
Deed Restrictions, also known as restrictive covenants, in property deeds are treated as if they were a contract between the buyer, the seller, and whomever else the covenant may concern. As a result, they are subject to the same sorts of rules governing contracts. Therefore, any person entitled to benefit under a restrictive covenant is entitled to sue to enforce it.

as long as federal and state laws do not preempt it, that is the point you are missing!

JoMar 04-14-2015 03:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chellybean (Post 1045054)
p.s. OMG they can not have you removed from the TV for a deed restriction, where in GODS name do you get your information.
PLEASE let them try that with me i welcome it, i would end up owning a good chunk of the Villages.
Have a good day and have a beer on me.

Keep thinking that way......:). The information came from Community Standards during a presentation on the steps taken by them when someone try's to break their contract. But, go get'em if that's what you want to do.

Chellybean 04-14-2015 03:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JoMar (Post 1045062)
Keep thinking that way......:). The information came from Community Standards during a presentation on the steps taken by them when someone try's to break their contract. But, go get'em if that's what you want to do.

omg!!!!!!!!!! go ahead and be intimidated .
Of course that is what the community standards wants you to believe.
That is the same thing the government wants people to be is sheeple.

graciegirl 04-14-2015 04:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chellybean (Post 1045065)
omg!!!!!!!!!! go ahead and be intimidated .
Of course that is what the community standards wants you to believe.
That is the same thing the government wants people to be is sheeple.


Deed restrictions are good. They keep property values high. If you break them you will be fined. If you don't pay it, further action will be leveled.

We have deliberately chosen areas WITH deed restrictions for many years as it protects our investment. I am surprised they are new to you.

https://www.talkofthevillages.com/fo...ly-vent-46492/

Chellybean 04-14-2015 07:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by graciegirl (Post 1045086)
Deed restrictions are good. They keep property values high. If you break them you will be fined. If you don't pay it, further action will be leveled.

We have deliberately chosen areas WITH deed restrictions for many years as it protects our investment. I am surprised they are new to you.

https://www.talkofthevillages.com/fo...ly-vent-46492/

Gracegirl they are not new to me and why in gods name is everyone missing the point.
i never said the deed restrictions where bad or good!
I simple said that some of the deed restrictions are not lawful and federal and state law preempts any deed restriction.
Let me give you folks a definition of PREEMPT

preemption. n. the rule of law that if the federal government through Congress has enacted legislation on a subject matter it shall be controlling over state laws and/or preclude the state from enacting laws on the same subject if Congress has specifically stated it has "occupied the field."

This is also applies to local governed deed restrictions of a certain development.
Another words no matter what the deed restriction says state and federal law overrules it and makes the deed restriction unlawful and unenforceable, period.
This is all i am saying and no matter what you are being told about antennas, the deed restriction can not be enforced due to federal and state law allowing them.
I hope this clarifies this for some of you, it seem that some folks came here to have there life's controlled beyond the legal limits of the law and accept what the powers to be tell you without standing up for yourselves.

TwinTurboViper 04-14-2015 07:27 PM

Thanks
 
Thanks for the suggestion as I have been looking for someone to install an antenna and will try "Solid Signal.com" :beer3:

=======================

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve9930 (Post 1035677)
The antenna I would like to try is an amplified antenna with a built in rotor. I believe it would fit in my attic. This the antenna I had spoken to an individual that had used one. They were very pleased with their performance. Its size is such that it is not any more intrusive looking then a satellite dish so I would not have a problem with mounting it outdoors. Prices range from $59 to $89 for the same antenna depending where you purchase it on the internet. I do a lot of business with solid signal.com.


TwinTurboViper 04-14-2015 07:29 PM

:BigApplause:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chellybean (Post 1045167)
Gracegirl they are not new to me and why in gods name is everyone missing the point.
i never said the deed restrictions where bad or good!
I simple said that some of the deed restrictions are not lawful and federal and state law preempts any deed restriction.
Let me give you folks a definition of PREEMPT

preemption. n. the rule of law that if the federal government through Congress has enacted legislation on a subject matter it shall be controlling over state laws and/or preclude the state from enacting laws on the same subject if Congress has specifically stated it has "occupied the field."

This is also applies to local governed deed restrictions of a certain development.
Another words no matter what the deed restriction says state and federal law overrules it and makes the deed restriction unlawful and unenforceable, period.
This is all i am saying and no matter what you are being told about antennas, the deed restriction can not be enforced due to federal and state law allowing them.
I hope this clarifies this for some of you, it seem that some folks came here to have there life's controlled beyond the legal limits of the law and accept what the powers to be tell you without standing up for yourselves.


dbussone 04-14-2015 07:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TwinTurboViper (Post 1045172)
:BigApplause:


We previously had a condo on St Pete Beach. Although the high rise had cable a couple of owners wanted a small dish to put on their balconies. The condo board told them they could not have a dish. One of the individuals was an attorney. He filed a complaint with the FCC. The FCC sent a letter to the condo board telling them to cease and desist. Guess who won that battle? I'll give you a hint - it starts with a big G.

tuccillo 04-14-2015 08:19 PM

I don't think anyone is debating this point. I also don't think anyone is debating whether you can install a sat dish or antenna - you can. I think people are talking past each other.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chellybean (Post 1045167)
Gracegirl they are not new to me and why in gods name is everyone missing the point.
i never said the deed restrictions where bad or good!
I simple said that some of the deed restrictions are not lawful and federal and state law preempts any deed restriction.
Let me give you folks a definition of PREEMPT

preemption. n. the rule of law that if the federal government through Congress has enacted legislation on a subject matter it shall be controlling over state laws and/or preclude the state from enacting laws on the same subject if Congress has specifically stated it has "occupied the field."

This is also applies to local governed deed restrictions of a certain development.
Another words no matter what the deed restriction says state and federal law overrules it and makes the deed restriction unlawful and unenforceable, period.
This is all i am saying and no matter what you are being told about antennas, the deed restriction can not be enforced due to federal and state law allowing them.
I hope this clarifies this for some of you, it seem that some folks came here to have there life's controlled beyond the legal limits of the law and accept what the powers to be tell you without standing up for yourselves.


Chellybean 04-14-2015 08:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tuccillo (Post 1045193)
I don't think anyone is debating this point. I also don't think anyone is debating whether you can install a sat dish or antenna - you can. I think people are talking past each other.

maybe your right, but we all paid dearly to live here at a inflated price and i clearly understand the deed restrictions especially as a builder from the north.
It seems people think that unlawful restrictions are enforceable and they are clearly not!
I didn't move here to be bullied or controlled beyond the law, this is all i am saying and some people have lost there vision of where they are.
also the powers to be can't protect your home prices and the economy takes care of that.
However we are in a better area of the country then most places.
Just a caveat of an example; gates don't keep criminals out if anyone can push the button and come in, this is why we have so many break-in's.
The law is what protects us from these thugs.

dbussone 04-14-2015 08:57 PM

A better story took place when I was the HOA president of a community in Las Vegas. Someone installed a dish on the side of their home. Some residents sent the HOA asking that a rule be passed banning dishes. I attempted to explain to the other members of the board why we could not regulate dishes, among other things. The board decided to create a rule over my objections, so I resigned before the final vote was taken. I contacted the HOA attorney and explained what had transpired. He then wrote a letter to the board explaining that they were violating federal law. In the last paragraph of his letter to the board, he resigned as the attorney for the HOA

Chellybean 04-15-2015 06:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dbussone (Post 1045214)
A better story took place when I was the HOA president of a community in Las Vegas. Someone installed a dish on the side of their home. Some residents sent the HOA asking that a rule be passed banning dishes. I attempted to explain to the other members of the board why we could not regulate dishes, among other things. The board decided to create a rule over my objections, so I resigned before the final vote was taken. I contacted the HOA attorney and explained what had transpired. He then wrote a letter to the board explaining that they were violating federal law. In the last paragraph of his letter to the board, he resigned as the attorney for the HOA

Thank you for bring this to light maybe people will get the point and understand what deed restrictions are.
Bravo to you for having the moral fiber and integrity to stand clear for the Law and not a dictatorship.

rjcataniajr 04-15-2015 07:12 AM

Hey Chellybean/Jim, some people just can't figure out anything unless its spoon fed to them.

tuccillo 04-15-2015 07:14 AM

Agreed. It is always worthwhile to read the documents that we signed upon buying here. The generic example I like to use regarding deed restrictions is that you cannot put a car up on blocks in your front yard. There is nothing unlawful about that restriction and if you persist there will be consequences. I have lived in two deed restricted communities (including The Villages) and I have never seen a restriction that gives me heartburn. For example, I am pretty sure I am not going to start drilling for oil on my property. The sat dish and antenna issue was put to rest quite some time ago by the FCC. If you do encounter a deed restriction that you believe runs counter to state or federal law, it should be straight forward to consult an attorney.

Regarding our gates, I believe their primary purpose is to regulate the flow of traffic at each Village entrance to prevent golf cart and car collisions. I don't think anyone believes they are a credible deterrent to crime. The best deterrent to crime is the vigilance of you and your neighbors, along with the Smith and Wesson Security Company ;-)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chellybean (Post 1045199)
maybe your right, but we all paid dearly to live here at a inflated price and i clearly understand the deed restrictions especially as a builder from the north.
It seems people think that unlawful restrictions are enforceable and they are clearly not!
I didn't move here to be bullied or controlled beyond the law, this is all i am saying and some people have lost there vision of where they are.
also the powers to be can't protect your home prices and the economy takes care of that.
However we are in a better area of the country then most places.
Just a caveat of an example; gates don't keep criminals out if anyone can push the button and come in, this is why we have so many break-in's.
The law is what protects us from these thugs.


dbussone 04-15-2015 07:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tuccillo (Post 1045306)
Agreed. It is always worthwhile to read the documents that we signed upon buying here. The generic example I like to use regarding deed restrictions is that you cannot put a car up on blocks in your front yard. There is nothing unlawful about that restriction and if you persist there will be consequences. I have lived in two deed restricted communities (including The Villages) and I have never seen a restriction that gives me heartburn. For example, I am pretty sure I am not going to start drilling for oil on my property. The sat dish and antenna issue was put to rest quite some time ago by the FCC. If you do encounter a deed restriction that you believe runs counter to state or federal law, it should be straight forward to consult an attorney.

Regarding our gates, I believe their primary purpose is to regulate the flow of traffic at each Village entrance to prevent golf cart and car collisions. I don't think anyone believes they are a credible deterrent to crime. The best deterrent to crime is the vigilance of you and your neighbors, along with the Smith and Wesson Security Company ;-)

Quite correct about the gates. We are not a gated community, but a community with gates. By the way, I believe there is also a law in FL that prohibits deed restrictions from interfering with the placement and use of outside clothe lines. Go figure.

graciegirl 04-15-2015 07:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rjcataniajr (Post 1045305)
Hey Chellybean/Jim, some people just can't figure out anything unless its spoon fed to them.

And for some reason, there are chameleons that are one thing one day and another the next.

I love debate, but I dislike those who just stir the pot.

Good post Tuccillo. You are always so logical and fair and clear in your posts.

BUT...I know where the boys are that were always looking to circumvent the rules and defy authority who used to go to the school where I was a student.

Some of them or those very similar to them have moved here to The Villages.

I like rule keepers and those motivated by respect for others. Thank goodness they are the majority here.

I like deed restrictions. A lot. AND rule followers. And I would not defy the FCC. Apparently there are those who want antennas.

They have the right. But no right to a flock of plastic pink flamingos south of 466. They will "get" you.

tuccillo 04-15-2015 07:31 AM

That is a very interesting story - thanks for sharing.

Quote:

Originally Posted by dbussone (Post 1045214)
A better story took place when I was the HOA president of a community in Las Vegas. Someone installed a dish on the side of their home. Some residents sent the HOA asking that a rule be passed banning dishes. I attempted to explain to the other members of the board why we could not regulate dishes, among other things. The board decided to create a rule over my objections, so I resigned before the final vote was taken. I contacted the HOA attorney and explained what had transpired. He then wrote a letter to the board explaining that they were violating federal law. In the last paragraph of his letter to the board, he resigned as the attorney for the HOA


tuccillo 04-15-2015 07:35 AM

I have lived in a gated community. We still had crime as people could jump the fences. In gated communities, you also "own" the roads so you directly bear the cost for road repairs.

Quote:

Originally Posted by dbussone (Post 1045314)
Quite correct about the gates. We are not a gated community, but a community with gates. By the way, I believe there is also a law in FL that prohibits deed restrictions from interfering with the placement and use of outside clothe lines. Go figure.


Chellybean 04-15-2015 07:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tuccillo (Post 1045306)
Agreed. It is always worthwhile to read the documents that we signed upon buying here. The generic example I like to use regarding deed restrictions is that you cannot put a car up on blocks in your front yard. There is nothing unlawful about that restriction and if you persist there will be consequences. I have lived in two deed restricted communities (including The Villages) and I have never seen a restriction that gives me heartburn. For example, I am pretty sure I am not going to start drilling for oil on my property. The sat dish and antenna issue was put to rest quite some time ago by the FCC. If you do encounter a deed restriction that you believe runs counter to state or federal law, it should be straight forward to consult an attorney.

Regarding our gates, I believe their primary purpose is to regulate the flow of traffic at each Village entrance to prevent golf cart and car collisions. I don't think anyone believes they are a credible deterrent to crime. The best deterrent to crime is the vigilance of you and your neighbors, along with the Smith and Wesson Security Company ;-)

I also agree but due to the key cards the powers to be seem to give a false sense of security of a gated community, most gated community's don't allow push button access though, which troubles me, you have to contact the friend your visiting to let you in and due to the high traffic here that is not practical.
Also when i was building my home at a design meeting i was told don't worry about a pre wired alarm system we rarely have any break-in's here. Well 11 break-in's in 3 months are certainly not rarely, with-in a mile of my home.
I insisted that i wanted pre wired windows and doors and gave them my design and it was a nightmare for it to get done properly to the point that the designer had to shutdown the job and i almost had to fly down to correct everything. After everything was completed the designer apologized and 148 item check list was given for repairs. Unfortunately they where building at to fast of a rate, about 350 a month and a lot of detail was missed.
For the most part everything was repaired with painful effort to get it done, everyone seem to play the blame game among contractors, nothing i am not used to being a retired builder.
I was told that pre wired alarms will no longer be done due to there are to many problems that come with that, and only wireless alarms will be installed after the house is close, which i am not a fan of wireless system due to interference, which i also have a electrical mechanical engineering background and i won't elaborate on that.
Point being read what you sign and don't believe everything your told, do your own research folks, have a good day.

Chellybean 04-15-2015 07:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tuccillo (Post 1045319)
I have lived in a gated community. We still had crime as people could jump the fences. In gated communities, you also "own" the roads so you directly bear the cost for road repairs.

yes, but we paid the bond which is for the infer-structure and are amenities are for repairs and up keeps for the area.
So indirectly we are paying for it.

graciegirl 04-15-2015 07:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chellybean (Post 1045327)
yes, but we paid the bond which is for the infer-structure and are amenities are for repairs and up keeps for the area.
So indirectly we are paying for it.

I think the subject just got changed. Isn't this the antenna/deed restrictions thread?

Chellybean 04-15-2015 07:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by graciegirl (Post 1045315)
And for some reason, there are chameleons that are one thing one day and another the next.

I love debate, but I dislike those who just stir the pot.

Good post Tuccillo. You are always so logical and fair and clear in your posts.

BUT...I know where the boys are that were always looking to circumvent the rules and defy authority who used to go to the school where I was a student.

Some of them or those very similar to them have moved here to The Villages.

I like rule keepers and those motivated by respect for others. Thank goodness they are the majority here.

I like deed restrictions. A lot. AND rule followers. And I would not defy the FCC. Apparently there are those who want antennas.

They have the right. But no right to a flock of plastic pink flamingos south of 466. They will "get" you.

well i was wonder what took you so long to chime in, l.o.l.
I hope you don't think i am a pot stirrer, i like rules and laws too, just not the unlawful ones, and i also like good debates. :)

graciegirl 04-15-2015 07:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chellybean (Post 1045324)
I also agree but due to the key cards the powers to be seem to give a false sense of security of a gated community, most gated community's don't allow push button access though, which troubles me, you have to contact the friend your visiting to let you in and due to the high traffic here that is not practical.
Also when i was building my home at a design meeting i was told don't worry about a pre wired alarm system we rarely have any break-in's here. Well 11 break-in's in 3 months are certainly not rarely, with-in a mile of my home.
I insisted that i wanted pre wired windows and doors and gave them my design and it was a nightmare for it to get done properly to the point that the designer had to shutdown the job and i almost had to fly down to correct everything. After everything was completed the designer apologized and 148 item check list was given for repairs. Unfortunately they where building at to fast of a rate, about 350 a month and a lot of detail was missed.
For the most part everything was repaired with painful effort to get it done, everyone seem to play the blame game among contractors, nothing i am not used to being a retired builder.
I was told that pre wired alarms will no longer be done due to there are to many problems that come with that, and only wireless alarms will be installed after the house is close, which i am not a fan of wireless system due to interference, which i also have a electrical mechanical engineering background and i won't elaborate on that.
Point being read what you sign and don't believe everything your told, do your own research folks, have a good day.


The roads belong to the county.

Read what you sign, and then follow the rules.

We had NO problem at all with either the new home that was already built or the one they built for us. It is their rules. There are certain things they would do, and would not do. We have built several homes and this was the best, and the easiest here in The Villages..

Chellybean 04-15-2015 07:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by graciegirl (Post 1045315)
And for some reason, there are chameleons that are one thing one day and another the next.

I love debate, but I dislike those who just stir the pot.

Good post Tuccillo. You are always so logical and fair and clear in your posts.

BUT...I know where the boys are that were always looking to circumvent the rules and defy authority who used to go to the school where I was a student.

Some of them or those very similar to them have moved here to The Villages.

I like rule keepers and those motivated by respect for others. Thank goodness they are the majority here.

I like deed restrictions. A lot. AND rule followers. And I would not defy the FCC. Apparently there are those who want antennas.

They have the right. But no right to a flock of plastic pink flamingos south of 466. They will "get" you.

p.s. Gracie i hope you don't like a flock of plastic pink flamingos, not mine and my wife's taste, i think that is punishable by the historical communities on public decor, you can get up to ten years in prision l.o.l.
Sorry Gracie i just couldn't resist, only a little poking fun.
Love your spunk

tuccillo 04-15-2015 07:58 AM

Clothes lines - hmmm, that is interesting. Perhaps it is considered an "energy saving device", sort of like solar panels, which I believe cannot be restricted either??

Quote:

Originally Posted by dbussone (Post 1045314)
Quite correct about the gates. We are not a gated community, but a community with gates. By the way, I believe there is also a law in FL that prohibits deed restrictions from interfering with the placement and use of outside clothe lines. Go figure.


tuccillo 04-15-2015 08:05 AM

I thought the actual roads were maintained by the county, via our property taxes, and is outside of the bond/maintenance fee. Anyone know for sure?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chellybean (Post 1045327)
yes, but we paid the bond which is for the infer-structure and are amenities are for repairs and up keeps for the area.
So indirectly we are paying for it.


tuccillo 04-15-2015 08:06 AM

I think we beat that horse to death and like a good conversation we are onto a new topic ;-)

Quote:

Originally Posted by graciegirl (Post 1045334)
I think the subject just got changed. Isn't this the antenna/deed restrictions thread?


Chellybean 04-15-2015 08:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by graciegirl (Post 1045343)
The roads belong to the county.

Read what you sign, and then follow the rules.

We had NO problem at all with either the new home that was already built or the one they built for us. It is their rules. There are certain things they would do, and would not do. We have built several homes and this was the best, and the easiest here in The Villages..

Gracie for the most part at the high rate of construction they do a pretty good job.
But it takes a trained eye to catch the mistakes, that is why homeowners pay professional to inspect their homes before the warranty is up.

Chellybean 04-15-2015 08:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tuccillo (Post 1045349)
I thought the actual roads were maintained by the county, via our property taxes, and is outside of the bond/maintenance fee. Anyone know for sure?


yes i believe you are correct, the point i was making is we pay for it, whether it is in a form of taxes or amenities.
The Villages do take care of alot of things over and above there responsibilities, and the road, curbs and gutters are some of the things outside of the one year requirement.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:52 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.