![]() |
Quote:
The same with electric cars, been around a LONG time, I think before Gas. But, never had a company that could produce and stand behind them. Now we do, and we are seeing the same thing - sales are taking off. Slowly at first, but it will grow exponentially, and 10 years from now we will look back and go WOW, how the did happen so fast. |
here you go after rebate of $7500
Alternative Fuels | Hybrid & Electric Cars & SUVs | Kia More at 250mile range Several more under $50K recharge time about 15 min on average Of course if you don't want to believe it you will not find them. |
Quote:
Of course, if you just want to be right then these are simply insignificant details |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Bill it clearly says Up to 310 miles of range. Moreover, how many times do you go that far? A few times a year maybe You are just dead set against any EV. Ever test drive one? I would bet you have a gas cart. I think you're reaching, if you just want to be right then these are simply insignificant details. |
Quote:
|
Tesla (TSLA) - Get Tesla Inc Report dominates the electric vehicle market, and its lead is likely to grow. That's because the manufacturer of the Model 3 sedan and the Model Y SUV is one of the few automakers able to meet demand in the face of supply-chain disruptions and rising prices for raw materials such as nickel, aluminum and palladium.
The automotive group will officially open its fourth production plant, in Austin, on April 7. This would enable it to produce just over 1.42 million vehicles in 2022 against 930,442 in 2021, industry sources estimate. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
And he's ignoring the federal rebates/tax credits. Without them the EVs cost significantly more... |
Quote:
The BIGGEST challenge I see right now to getting the exponential growth going is the battery supply. All the other manufacturers are going to have a hard time catching up with Tesla's battery supply - Tesla has a big lead and makes their own. But, maybe not, we could all be nuked back into the Stone Age - someone said, if WWIII is fought with nukes, WWIV will be fought with sticks and stones... |
Quote:
You are taking a KIA marketing line, up to 310 miles (going downhill with a tailwind and the air conditioner off on a good day) and disputing an independent evaluation. Even the KIA information of charging to 217 miles in 18 minutes makes me question the 310. Would they really advertise a 70% charge in 18 minutes or would they advertise a commonly-quoted 80% charge? If the 80% charge then their range would be 270 miles which, while greater than the 237 found by Edmunds, and though technically fitting the "up to 310 miles" marketing line, is less than 300 miles of usable range. I'm not against EVs at all, I would love to find one that is both affordable and meets my needs. Doesn't exist yet. What I am against is unsubstantiated claims such as that there are several manufacturers of EVs with a 300 mile range and a price tag under $35,000. Google won't find them because they don't exist, at least without the marketing qualifiers of "up to 310 miles" and "after rebates." To answer your question, I have made at least 10 trips of 300 miles or more (several were 900-1200 miles) in the last 12 months. And yes, a gas cart. A pretty safe bet given the ratio of carts on the paths these days. In my case, price and availability trumped zealotry. |
Quote:
|
How long will it be until an electric long hauler is robot driven? Probably not too far in the future.
|
Quote:
The design is complete-ish, and it waiting for batteries to begin delivery. Tesla is building more battery factories as fast as they can around the world, and upgrading existing factories to "better" batteries. I expect they will start delivering functional beta's within a year. I also expect at least for a year or two they will require a driver to be present - "just in case". But the advantages are so enormous that customers are ready to pounce when they become available. Currently there are around 300,000 to 500,000 long haul drivers in the US. I expect it will take at least 5 to 10 years to produce that many trucks. Also, other truck companies have announced they are going to be producing soon. There are several components. The engines may be produced by one company, the cabs and trailers by another. The software for the Full Self Driving yet another. I read that Cummins has announce some electric drive trains, I am not sure if they are long haul or not. Detroit has also announced electric drive trains to their product lines, I do not know their delivery schedules. I expect a diesel drive train could be installed in a FSD (Full Self Driving) chassis, but I have not heard of anyone planning that. I don't see why that would be "harder" than electric, and so that could help increase the rate of conversion to "robot" FSD long haul trucks. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Scotty has millions of viewer’s followers on utube. he’s a Toyota whore, has been mechanic since teenager. he claims he’s millionaire from his online posting and reviews. You either hate him or love him due to his raw opinionated pod casts. Few can dispute majority of his reviews with facts. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Trains have been electric driven when they retired steam engine trains. As far as long haul trucks not going to happen in my life , one ot two hundred miles is not long haul IMO. |
Dinosaurs!
Polluting, smelly, noisy complex internal combustion engines (and their expensive maintenance) are thankfully going the way of the dinosaurs as are those who refuse to embrace new technology. When you can't stand change (even when it is a good thing) you know you are too old.
P.S. Check your grammar |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Very similar to the early quotes regarding horses, and ICE. |
Quote:
41 years ago there were no cell phones. Today most people don't have a land line (unless they are our age - LOL) I had a boss that refused to use an ATM just 30 years ago. Technology marches on faster than most people think. |
Quote:
This very case is widely disputed even within the US Supreme Court, let alone the many grammar experts. In this case (possessive of a singular word ending with “s”), both ways are acceptable, according e.g. to The Merriam-Webster Dictionary, Grammarly and various other sources. The New-York Times, Associated Press ans Penguin books are even officially opting for Markus’ car Many purists still require Markus’s car. There are even experts who apply different rules depending on whether the name is monosyllabic or not, and, if not, apply a different rule depending on which syllable receives the stress. Their only exception would go to Biblical proper names, like Moses’. So, you see… To prevent the accumulation of “esses”, I would opt for Markus’ car. And I guess usage, the ultimate long term judge, will choose the same way, i.e. simplicity |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Never not that far off for me…. I can say I will never see lots of things like human space travel to another planet or batteries replacing diesel powers train generators. :) |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:42 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by
DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.