Talk of The Villages Florida

Talk of The Villages Florida (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/)
-   The Villages, Florida, Non Villages Discussion (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-non-villages-discussion-93/)
-   -   Pete Rose dead (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-non-villages-discussion-93/pete-rose-dead-353386/)

blueash 10-02-2024 10:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimjamuser (Post 2375575)
Don't forget that the value of money (the dollar) has changed radically over all those years. You need to convert the older players salaries to today"s dollar value. What that will LIKELY reveal is that Mickey Mantle was probably paid as much as today's players. Note : I have NOT taken the time to make the actual calculation. I am not that interested. Someone else may be?

Mantle's highest salary, his contract in 1963 was for 100,000. That is less than one million in today's dollars. So no, before free agency the salaries are not even close. I read a book as a child about the Yankees which had a story that Mickey wanted more than 100,000 but was told that 100,000 was the salary Babe Ruth got and nobody was worth more than the Babe. (Actually Babe got 80,000 in 1930 80,000 in 1930 dollars translates to 142000 in 1963 dollars and 1,400,000 today.

For 1.4 million today you can pay a benchwarmer, maybe.

Shipping up to Boston 10-02-2024 11:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blueash (Post 2375588)
Mantle's highest salary, his contract in 1963 was for 100,000. That is less than one million in today's dollars. So no, before free agency the salaries are not even close. I read a book as a child about the Yankees which had a story that Mickey wanted more than 100,000 but was told that 100,000 was the salary Babe Ruth got and nobody was worth more than the Babe. (Actually Babe got 80,000 in 1930 80,000 in 1930 dollars translates to 142000 in 1963 dollars and 1,400,000 today.

For 1.4 million today you can pay a benchwarmer, maybe.

Just for reference...

Median price of a home in NY in 1930 was around 6K ...in 1963 was around 19K. 2024 is around 799K*

*Realtor.com

jimjamuser 10-02-2024 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThirdOfFive (Post 2375514)
It is easy to like a person with an attitude like Joe DiMaggio's. But pro athletes don't achieve megastar success based on their personality. They achieve it through excellence in their chosen sport. Many "superstars" were and are pretty dislikeable as human beings.

You can respect the accomplishments without respecting the person.

Some superstars are exceptions to that. For example Stephen Curry, who just exudes personality and remains very humble. Also Arnold Palmer.

jimjamuser 10-02-2024 11:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blueash (Post 2375588)
Mantle's highest salary, his contract in 1963 was for 100,000. That is less than one million in today's dollars. So no, before free agency the salaries are not even close. I read a book as a child about the Yankees which had a story that Mickey wanted more than 100,000 but was told that 100,000 was the salary Babe Ruth got and nobody was worth more than the Babe. (Actually Babe got 80,000 in 1930 80,000 in 1930 dollars translates to 142000 in 1963 dollars and 1,400,000 today.

For 1.4 million today you can pay a benchwarmer, maybe.

Thanks for the explanation. That puts the various players in perspective. I forgot that free agency would radically change ANY comparison between today's players and the older legends.

badkarma318 10-02-2024 10:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shipping up to Boston (Post 2375475)
I’m not defending his character....the only thing he’s been sanctioned for ...was as a manager, for gambling. If you want rumors, hearsay and the unsubstantiated to be the standard, then you have a lot of evictions to effect in Cooperstown. If ‘scumbaggery’ was the standard, the place would be nearly empty!

If you think him using corked bats is "rumors, hearsay and the unsubstantiated", then you need to do some research. There were bats that he used in games, then walked off the field and handed them to friends as gifts - these were x-rayed and proven to have been corked. Numerous clubhouse employees have stated that they had personal knowledge of him using corked bats, and on and on. Father Time was coming for him, and his massive ego couldn't accept that, so he did whatever he could to try and hang on for a few more years.

Shipping up to Boston 10-03-2024 06:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by badkarma318 (Post 2375716)
If you think him using corked bats is "rumors, hearsay and the unsubstantiated", then you need to do some research. There were bats that he used in games, then walked off the field and handed them to friends as gifts - these were x-rayed and proven to have been corked. Numerous clubhouse employees have stated that they had personal knowledge of him using corked bats, and on and on. Father Time was coming for him, and his massive ego couldn't accept that, so he did whatever he could to try and hang on for a few more years.

I’ve seen the same searches as you and remember the era. I believe a good portion (liken to steroid era) were cheating. Pitchers with their ‘substances’ on their lids, HGH, steroids, pine tar and yes....corked bats. Yet the baseball writers still let select players of the aforementioned....in the Hall. So I guess it’s not so much about the player, it’s the process. It’s completely flawed

Rainger99 10-03-2024 06:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shipping up to Boston (Post 2375729)
I’ve seen the same searches as you and remember the era. I believe a good portion (liken to steroid era) were cheating. Pitchers with their ‘substances’ on their lids, HGH, steroids, pine tar and yes....corked bats. Yet the baseball writers still let select players of the aforementioned....in the Hall. So I guess it’s not so much about the player, it’s the process. It’s completely flawed

It makes you appreciate professional golfers. I would say that 99% do not cheat and call penalties on themselves.

A gentleman’s sport with a code of honor.

On the other hand, 90% of weekend golfers cheat. Mulligans, improve their lie, toss the ball out of the bunker or rough, etc., etc.

Shipping up to Boston 10-03-2024 06:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rainger99 (Post 2375738)
It makes you appreciate professional golfers. I would say that 99% do not cheat and call penalties on themselves.

A gentleman’s sport with a code of honor.

On the other hand, 90% of weekend golfers cheat. Mulligans, improve their lie, toss the ball out of the bunker or rough, etc., etc.

I’m still, as stated, a hack. So I’ve never cheated because I’m just not that improved due to the frequency that I play the game. Translation; a stroke or two isn’t gonna change my life on the links! Now the PGA ‘fan boys’ that I play with....let’s just say some, not all are somewhat challenged on the topic!:1rotfl:

LuckyRicky 10-03-2024 04:52 PM

Pete Rose dead
 
No no not ever

badkarma318 10-03-2024 10:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shipping up to Boston (Post 2375729)
I’ve seen the same searches as you and remember the era. I believe a good portion (liken to steroid era) were cheating. Pitchers with their ‘substances’ on their lids, HGH, steroids, pine tar and yes....corked bats. Yet the baseball writers still let select players of the aforementioned....in the Hall. So I guess it’s not so much about the player, it’s the process. It’s completely flawed

True.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:38 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.