Talk of The Villages Florida

Talk of The Villages Florida (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/)
-   The Villages, Florida, Non Villages Discussion (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-non-villages-discussion-93/)
-   -   Politically Correct (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-non-villages-discussion-93/politically-correct-241725/)

graciegirl 05-31-2017 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sandtrap328 (Post 1405223)
WRONG!

If, however, you believe what you said is correct, give some examples of political correctness speech is the first step in destroying a free society.

I will try. Anytime free communication is directed or squelched than free speech suffers.

Political Correctness, when we are directed by a group thinking THEY are more sensitive and caring than the rest of us, to use or not use certain words, doesn't change anyone's morality or attitude or the reality of the situation. . It doesn't make anyone MORE respected. It doesn't make an unusual situation or circumstance or person more understood or repected on accepted. It is "Kewl" for the young and aggravating as hell for the old.

Only a kind heart can really be the answer and in the face of that not working, a really good sense of humor, that sees that we are all part of a society that looks stupid occasionally. We cannot laugh at others unless we can laugh at ourselves.

This goes back to the picture of the pitiful man (IN HANDCUFFS) sitting with his pants around his ankles in a public place. It could be you or it could be me. I would expect that if it were me, that someone would find it a tad bit humorous.

That is the reason I stopped drinking.

Barefoot 05-31-2017 11:44 AM

Like Villager Joyce, I believe in following the Golden Rule. But sadly, sometimes I'm a work in progress.
Redwitch, thanks for starting an interesting Thread.

ColdNoMore 05-31-2017 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sandtrap328 (Post 1405223)
WRONG!

If, however, you believe what you said is correct, give some examples of political correctness speech is the first step in destroying a free society.

:BigApplause:

redwitch 05-31-2017 11:53 AM

To me, being PC is not a group or person acting nor thinking they are morally superior, it is pointing out how hurtful and wrong some words are. That's why the N and K words are no longer socially acceptable. It took folks standing up and saying those words were wrong and would not be be said in their presence or in their homes. It took courage and fortitude. Today, PC has gone too far and can be absolutely ridiculous. So, I know longer go by what is considered PC. Instead, I stand by my rule that if a word or phrase will hurt another, I don't use it around that person. Doesn't mean I won't utter that word away from them, just not around them.

For example, I have a potty mouth, to put it mildly. I have some friends who never curse, damn being about as strong their language gets. I do my very best to not curse around them. If I slip, I immediately apologize. Psychology was my major. Retarded was and is a clinical term referring to individuals with an extremely low IQ, ditto moron. Today, retarded has become mentally challenged. To me, mentally challenged is a total misnomer. It says nothing about the degree of retardation. Regardless, I do my best to not say retarded or moron when describing a person. I'll stick with mentally challenged unless I am speaking in a clinical sense, usually with a medical or psychiatric professional.

So, maybe we shouldn't worry so much whether something is PC. Maybe we should just try basic kindness, understanding and thoughtfulness. The hel...heck with the PC police. Seems like that would take care of most issues.

Aw Man 05-31-2017 12:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sandtrap328 (Post 1405011)
What are some of the principles of political correctness you are speaking about in your first sentence?

As for your second sentence, I hope you do not call other races, ethnicities, gendered identified, etc by names not "PC".

We have to have and to use common courtesy in speaking of and about others.

Good post. I agree with you.

graciegirl 05-31-2017 12:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aw Man (Post 1405262)
Good post. I agree with you.

How do you feel about terms such as "greenies" and Tax payers. ;)

Aw Man 05-31-2017 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by graciegirl (Post 1405264)
How do you feel about terms such as "greenies" and Tax payers. ;)

Both terms can be used to refer to others in a derogatory manner. If that's the intended use of either term, I'm against using them.

I was born and raised in Ohio. Over my adult years in Illinois, my friends often referred to me as the "Ohioan". I was always proud when they did so.
I was taken aback at my retirement party when all my friends told me the many, many derogatory definitions of the term "Ohioan" that is in common use in Illinois (and probably Michigan).

Rapscallion St Croix 05-31-2017 01:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by redwitch (Post 1405245)
To me, being PC is not a group or person acting nor thinking they are morally superior, it is pointing out how hurtful and wrong some words are. That's why the N and K words are no longer socially acceptable. It took folks standing up and saying those words were wrong and would not be be said in their presence or in their homes. It took courage and fortitude. .

That is not universal. Apparently it is perfectly alright to use the N word if you are a hip hop artist or a black comedian.

2BNTV 05-31-2017 01:52 PM

I remember when PC meant personal computer but class never is out of style.

Ann Landers

Class never runs scared.
It is sure-footed and confident.
It can handle anything that comes along.
Class has a sense of humor.
It knows a good laugh is the best lubricant for oiling the machinery of human relations.

Class never makes excuses.
It takes its lumps and learns from past mistakes.
Class knows that good manners are nothing more than a series of small, inconsequential sacrifices.

Class bespeaks an aristocracy that has nothing to do with ancestors or money.
Some wealthy “blue bloods” have no class, while individuals who are struggling to make ends meet are loaded with it.

Class is real.
It can’t be faked.

Class never tried to build itself by tearing others down.
Class is already up and need not strive to look better by making others look worse.

Class can “walk with kings and keep it’s virtue and talk with crowds and keep the common touch.” Everyone is comfortable with the person who has class because that person is comfortable with himself.

If you have class, you’ve got it made.

If you don’t have class, no matter what else you have, it doesn’t make any difference.”


― Ann Landers

manaboutown 05-31-2017 02:01 PM

Political correctness has literally run amuck for some years now. It has cost perfectly innocent people their livelihoods and reputations. For example the word "niggardly" has been around for quite a while. It was used by Chaucer, Milton and Shakespeare and is not even remotely related to "The N word". Indeed it has no racial connotations whatsoever. The Masticator: A Very Awkward, Uncomfortable Word of the Day: Niggardly Yet folks who have used it quite appropriately on occasion have paid a heavy price because highly vocal, ignorant and uniformed people accused of them using "the N word". Washingtonpost.com: D.C. Mayor Acted 'Hastily,' Will Rehire Aide

ColdNoMore 05-31-2017 02:14 PM

I realize this won't change the minds of those who want to justify their use (or acceptance) of the 'N' word...but here it goes anyway.

Why Explaining 'The N-Word' To Non-Black People Is So Damn Exhausting | HuffPost

Quote:

Every black person who lives in the United States at some point or another comes to accept one thing: the “N-word” is not going away.

Whether you use it or not, whether you are OK with it or deeply offended by it, it’s a word weighted down with so much history and so much pain that is impossible to avoid.

The general consensus among most black people is that “******” is a word best left for us to grapple with. In other words: non-black people — and especially white people — shouldn’t use it. That means colloquially or derogatorily, in context or out. And honestly, we know you’re going to use it anyway, but don’t use it around us.

It would take too long to unpack all the arguments and counterarguments about why white people should avoid the word altogether.

Countless people have explained why there are no special excuses or circumstances for white people saying *****, and have outlined why this is not a double standard.


redwitch 05-31-2017 02:30 PM

I have a real simple rule: black, white, purple, green, polka dotted, I don't care. You will not use a racial slur in my home nor in front of me. You get one warning. The second time, you are kicked to the curb or I am long gone. What you do when I'm not around is up to you. I can't stop you but I will think less of you if I hear about it. The same is true if you try to publicly humiliate someone in a mean or vicious manner. Can't stop you but I certainly don't have to like or respect you.

graciegirl 05-31-2017 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ColdNoMore (Post 1405308)
I realize this won't change the minds of those who want to justify their use (or acceptance) of the 'N' word...but here it goes anyway.

Why Explaining 'The N-Word' To Non-Black People Is So Damn Exhausting | HuffPost

I don't know anyone who uses the "n" word. That is not the point or the crux of any conversations on political correctness. PC is a new language that is a shelter for a new mode of communication that does not allow a spade to be called a spade.

We are not only being forced to accept we aren't kind or nice if we don't use ridiculous language, we are expected to build a whole new series of bathrooms when people who have identified as a certain gender have probably been using that gender's bathroom for a long time unnoticed. The very small numbers of individuals that this directly affects is so small as that most of us have never even noticed that they were using the bathroom that was different than their sex at birth. Most people don't ever want to hurt someone's feelings who are born with an atypical condition. The callous and unkind aren't going to be changed by a third type of bathroom.

manaboutown 05-31-2017 02:35 PM

Certain PC terms are simply inaccurate but are imposed on a population to achieve political agendas. Off hand the term "Native American" as it was invented and has been used by the PC crowd is preposterous. People of any racial background born in America are native Americans. The first people known to settle a designated area are aboriginal. The PC use of the term "Native American" is not only misdescriptive, it disenfranchises people born in America as native Americans.

The use of "red state" for Republican majority voting and "blue state" for Democrat majority voting feels counterintuitive to me. I still have to remind myself which is which because the color red has been prevalently used by socialistic countries such as the former USSR and China for many, many years. Therefore when I hear "red state" what comes to mind is "socialistic (Democrat) state". I still have to use "R is for Republican" as a mnemonic device. Language is powerful. He who controls it controls thinking patterns and viewpoints. Obviously the MSM came up with the red state - blue state designations which no doubt shape public feelings to some degree. Red vs. Blue: A history of how we use political colors - The Washington Post

manaboutown 05-31-2017 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ColdNoMore (Post 1405308)
I realize this won't change the minds of those who want to justify their use (or acceptance) of the 'N' word...but here it goes anyway.

Why Explaining 'The N-Word' To Non-Black People Is So Damn Exhausting | HuffPost

The "N" word is offensive to me and everyone I know. Terms found offensive by members of other groups are inappropriate and not to be tolerated either. This attitude relates to offensive language and has nothing to do with PC.

Steve9930 05-31-2017 03:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sandtrap328 (Post 1405223)
WRONG!

If, however, you believe what you said is correct, give some examples of political correctness speech is the first step in destroying a free society.


I don't have to give any example you just did it for me!

Sandtrap328 05-31-2017 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve9930 (Post 1405337)
I don't have to give any example you just did it for me!

By saying I believe you to be wrong is an example of how political correctness in speech is destroying a free society?

Given the possibility I may be wrong, asking for examples is destroying a free society?

I don't understand your point.

Sandtrap328 05-31-2017 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by graciegirl (Post 1405231)
I will try. Anytime free communication is directed or squelched than free speech suffers.

Political Correctness, when we are directed by a group thinking THEY are more sensitive and caring than the rest of us, to use or not use certain words, doesn't change anyone's morality or attitude or the reality of the situation. . It doesn't make anyone MORE respected. It doesn't make an unusual situation or circumstance or person more understood or repected on accepted. It is "Kewl" for the young and aggravating as hell for the old.

Only a kind heart can really be the answer and in the face of that not working, a really good sense of humor, that sees that we are all part of a society that looks stupid occasionally. We cannot laugh at others unless we can laugh at ourselves.

This goes back to the picture of the pitiful man (IN HANDCUFFS) sitting with his pants around his ankles in a public place. It could be you or it could be me. I would expect that if it were me, that someone would find it a tad bit humorous.

That is the reason I stopped drinking.


What I believe you are saying is it is wrong to impose certain words that may or may not have had different connotations in the past.

For example, my old high school football team name was changed from The Crusaders to The Bulldogs. PC and dumb? Maybe? Well, maybe not to the influx of Muslims in the school district. Did it hurt anyone to change it? No. Would a Muslim boy want to be a Crusader? Doubt it.

Go with the flow and remain kind and generous and we have a great life.
Anyhow, PC language is ridiculous at times - but it is not going to cause the downfall of America.

Rapscallion St Croix 05-31-2017 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by manaboutown (Post 1405325)
The "N" word is offensive to me and everyone I know. Terms found offensive by members of other groups are inappropriate and not to be tolerated either. This attitude relates to offensive language and has nothing to do with PC.

So, help me out here. Is comparing one's own bowling skills to Special Olympics non PC or just offensive?

Taltarzac725 05-31-2017 03:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by redwitch (Post 1405316)
I have a real simple rule: black, white, purple, green, polka dotted, I don't care. You will not use a racial slur in my home nor in front of me. You get one warning. The second time, you are kicked to the curb or I am long gone. What you do when I'm not around is up to you. I can't stop you but I will think less of you if I hear about it. The same is true if you try to publicly humiliate someone in a mean or vicious manner. Can't stop you but I certainly don't have to like or respect you.

I remember getting upset when a woman I really like used the word "chink" when describing some neighbor. I did not say anything but it certainly cooled my feelings for her a great deal. I have had friends who are Japanese-American, Korean, Chinese, Chinese-American, etc. I try not to socialize with people who seem like bigots. Sometimes you have no choice though.

manaboutown 05-31-2017 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rapscallion St Croix (Post 1405351)
So, help me out here. Is comparing one's own bowling skills to Special Olympics non PC or just offensive?

Doing this perhaps would be more like comparing apples to oranges. Meaningless. At least if one is fully functional both physically and mentally...

Steve9930 05-31-2017 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sandtrap328 (Post 1405338)
By saying I believe you to be wrong is an example of how political correctness in speech is destroying a free society?

Given the possibility I may be wrong, asking for examples is destroying a free society?

I don't understand your point.

First there is a difference between typing WRONG and wrong. Second you made a judgment as me being wrong before I even gave and example. If you definitively say I'm wrong then there is no reason to give any example. This is exactly what the left uses to suppress thought. PC is just more then words, its attitude toward the user. The San Bernadino CA. event happened because the neighbors were afraid of being labelled racist. There are girls and boys, men and women. However Girls is an acceptable term today. If you use it you will be called a sexist or anti women. Communications is the most important part of solving any problem and every word even the 4 letter ones have a use under certain circumstances. To limit words is to limit thought. To ban words by some is to limit another's freedom of expression. I may not like your wording but I defend your right to say it, even to armed conflict. Some where along the line a group has decided that you just don't listen if your offended, but label the user negatively and demand they stop using the word. That's tyranny not freedom of thought. This has spread to the point on campuses where violence is being used to suppress speech. In history these are the beginning steps to domination of the society by tyrants, like Hitler, Stallon, Mao. Freedom comes with risk and at times being offended.

manaboutown 05-31-2017 03:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sandtrap328 (Post 1405348)
What I believe you are saying is it is wrong to impose certain words that may or may not have had different connotations in the past.

For example, my old high school football team name was changed from The Crusaders to The Bulldogs. PC and dumb? Maybe? Well, maybe not to the influx of Muslims in the school district. Did it hurt anyone to change it? No. Would a Muslim boy want to be a Crusader? Doubt it.

Go with the flow and remain kind and generous and we have a great life.
Anyhow, PC language is ridiculous at times - but it is not going to cause the downfall of America.

Thankfully my high schools teams were named the Hornets. I hope that designation stings no one today.

Carl in Tampa 05-31-2017 03:56 PM

1984
 
Originally Posted by Steve9930
PC and being courteous and respectful are not one in the same. The architects of PC would have you believe they are one and the same. PC is suppression of speech. PC is about controlling your thoughts and ideas to make them conform to someone's standards who believe your ideas are incorrect and their ideas are far superior to yours. PC is the first step in the destruction of a free society. It's a tool used control the masses. So when you see people promote this it has nothing to do with common courtesy and being polite.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sandtrap328 (Post 1405223)
WRONG!

If, however, you believe what you said is correct, give some examples of political correctness speech is the first step in destroying a free society.

I am surprised that this thread has gone this far without someone mentioning George Orwell's novel 1984.

More than simply a novel, this book, published in 1948, was predictive of a future that we are fast approaching, where both the thoughts and the behavior of citizens are controlled by the government.

Start with the employment of the principal character in the book, Winston Smith. He works for the Ministry of Truth in the History Section, where he is daily called upon to destroy historical documents and write a "new" history. There are echos of current claims of "False News" or "Alternative Facts" that we hear about daily.

In this fictional region called Oceania, there are four ministries. 1. The Ministry of Truth - Dedicated to propaganda and altering historical documents. 2. The Ministry of Love - Dedicated to Law and Order by use of brutal physical and psychological force. 3. The Ministry of Peace - Dedicated to war efforts. There is never a global war; just little regional wars that are always breaking out. People who were our friends are now our enemies, and vice-versa. 4. The Ministry of Plenty - Devoted to rationing because everything is in short supply.

The story line of the novel is not the main point of the book. Rather, the separate discussions of the functions of the Ministries are the real point, although many people fail to read this part.

The discussion of the activities of the Ministry of Truth is most directly related to this thread on TOTV. In this, Orwell discusses in great detail how government control of the elements of discussion (Political Correctness) achieves control over the thinking of the citizens. He gives the example of how it becomes impossible for citizens to contemplate the overthrow of the government because they are not even able to think in those terms.

To the extent that free-thinking citizens submit to Politically Correct speech, they are surrendering their freedom, and are on the path to destruction of a free society.

----------------------------------------------------

The Constitution of the United States does not protect its citizens from being offended, nor does it limit offensive speech.

I do not go out of my way to offend people, nor do I use derogatory terms for ethnic groups. But, among terms that I have no problem using are "Illegal Aliens" for foreigners who are in our country illegally, and "Indians" for the peoples who were in America when the first Europeans arrived. Columbus did not call the natives "Indians" as an insult, but rather because he thought he had reached India.

Do yourself a favor and read 1984.

Rapscallion St Croix 05-31-2017 03:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by manaboutown (Post 1405362)
Doing this perhaps would be more like comparing apples to oranges. Meaningless. At least if one is fully functional both physically and mentally...

I respect your command of gobbledygook and dancing around a question.

manaboutown 05-31-2017 04:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rapscallion St Croix (Post 1405379)
I respect your command of gobbledygook and dancing around a question.

Well as we used to say in the computer industry, "garbage in; garbage out".

Steve9930 05-31-2017 04:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carl in Tampa (Post 1405378)
Originally Posted by Steve9930
PC and being courteous and respectful are not one in the same. The architects of PC would have you believe they are one and the same. PC is suppression of speech. PC is about controlling your thoughts and ideas to make them conform to someone's standards who believe your ideas are incorrect and their ideas are far superior to yours. PC is the first step in the destruction of a free society. It's a tool used control the masses. So when you see people promote this it has nothing to do with common courtesy and being polite.


I am surprised that this thread has gone this far without someone mentioning George Orwell's novel 1984.

More than simply a novel, this book, published in 1948, was predictive of a future that we are fast approaching, where both the thoughts and the behavior of citizens are controlled by the government.

Start with the employment of the principal character in the book, Winston Smith. He works for the Ministry of Truth in the History Section, where he is daily called upon to destroy historical documents and write a "new" history. There are echos of current claims of "False News" or "Alternative Facts" that we hear about daily.

In this fictional region called Oceania, there are four ministries. 1. The Ministry of Truth - Dedicated to propaganda and altering historical documents. 2. The Ministry of Love - Dedicated to Law and Order by use of brutal physical and psychological force. 3. The Ministry of Peace - Dedicated to war efforts. There is never a global war; just little regional wars that are always breaking out. People who were our friends are now our enemies, and vice-versa. 4. The Ministry of Plenty - Devoted to rationing because everything is in short supply.

The story line of the novel is not the main point of the book. Rather, the separate discussions of the functions of the Ministries are the real point, although many people fail to read this part.

The discussion of the activities of the Ministry of Truth is most directly related to this thread on TOTV. In this, Orwell discusses in great detail how government control of the elements of discussion (Political Correctness) achieves control over the thinking of the citizens. He gives the example of how it becomes impossible for citizens to contemplate the overthrow of the government because they are not even able to think in those terms.

To the extent that free-thinking citizens submit to Politically Correct speech, they are surrendering their freedom, and are on the path to destruction of a free society.

----------------------------------------------------

The Constitution of the United States does not protect its citizens from being offended, nor does it limit offensive speech.

I do not go out of my way to offend people, nor do I use derogatory terms for ethnic groups. But, among terms that I have no problem using are "Illegal Aliens" for foreigners who are in our country illegally, and "Indians" for the peoples who were in America when the first Europeans arrived. Columbus did not call the natives "Indians" as an insult, but rather because he thought he had reached India.

Do yourself a favor and read 1984.

Great insight Carl. Will this become a self fore filling Prophesy? Will fiction become truth? Only time will tell.

Carl in Tampa 05-31-2017 04:29 PM

He didn't understand
 
Originally Posted by Rapscallion St Croix
So, help me out here. Is comparing one's own bowling skills to Special Olympics non PC or just offensive?

Originally Posted by manaboutown
Doing this perhaps would be more like comparing apples to oranges. Meaningless. At least if one is fully functional both physically and mentally...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rapscallion St Croix (Post 1405379)
I respect your command of gobbledygook and dancing around a question.

Perhaps manaboutown didn't recognize President Obama's statement about his poor bowling skills and identifying with the limited skills of participants in the Special Olympics........... which many considered very offensive.

OR...... he simply wouldn't address the question directly.

ColdNoMore 05-31-2017 04:33 PM

Some of y'all crack me the heck up. :1rotfl:


NO ONE has stated that you shouldn't be able to use whatever words you want...or that they be made 'illegal.' :oops:


Some of us are simply saying, that you're gonna have to live with the ridicule, lack of respect and disgust from decent people...when you choose to use those words. :ohdear:


It really is...as simple as that. :ho:

manaboutown 05-31-2017 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carl in Tampa (Post 1405396)
Originally Posted by Rapscallion St Croix
So, help me out here. Is comparing one's own bowling skills to Special Olympics non PC or just offensive?

Originally Posted by manaboutown
Doing this perhaps would be more like comparing apples to oranges. Meaningless. At least if one is fully functional both physically and mentally...



Perhaps manaboutown didn't recognize President Obama's statement about his poor bowling skills and identifying with the limited skills of participants in the Special Olympics........... which many considered very offensive.

OR...... he simply wouldn't address the question directly.

I was indeed unaware of Obama's comment. It was of course very offensive. Thank you for posting this information, Carl.

Nucky 05-31-2017 04:56 PM

I'm serious, it is great to read what everyone has posted in this thread. I never had a chance to consider such things in my work life. It was survival of the fittest in deed and word and anything went. It was touchy sometimes. I wonder if PC is different regionally speaking?? The reason I mention that is people we have encountered in Florida are so reserved and not in your grill like in New Jersey, New York and Philly. Not one mean spirited word spoke to us since we moved here. Written words have been rough from time to time but normally from people from our neck of the woods.

Carl in Tampa 05-31-2017 09:00 PM

Thought Police
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ColdNoMore (Post 1405399)
Some of y'all crack me the heck up. :1rotfl:


NO ONE has stated that you shouldn't be able to use whatever words you want...or that they be made 'illegal.' :oops:


Some of us are simply saying, that you're gonna have to live with the ridicule, lack of respect and disgust from decent people...when you choose to use those words. :ohdear:


It really is...as simple as that. :ho:

The issue is not that certain words might be made "illegal."

It is that by adhering to Political Correctness certain words are made "unacceptable." Or as YOU say, "... you're gonna have to live with the ridicule, lack of respect and disgust from decent people...when you choose to use those words."

And, as demonstrated in the novel 1984, this can lead to "Thought Crime" under the rules of "New Speak." Newspeak is a controlled language, of restricted grammar and limited vocabulary, a linguistic design meant to limit the freedom of thought—personal identity, self-expression, and free will. This can lead to enslavement of the minds of an entire population.

Congratulations, as an enforcer of New Speak, you have become a member of the Thought Police.

1984 is worthy of reading and serious contemplation.

ColdNoMore 05-31-2017 09:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carl in Tampa (Post 1405514)
The issue is not that certain words might be made "illegal."

It is that by adhering to Political Correctness certain words are made "unacceptable." Or as YOU say, "... you're gonna have to live with the ridicule, lack of respect and disgust from decent people...when you choose to use those words."

And, as demonstrated in the novel 1984, this can lead to "Thought Crime" under the rules of "New Speak." Newspeak is a controlled language, of restricted grammar and limited vocabulary, a linguistic design meant to limit the freedom of thought—personal identity, self-expression, and free will. This can lead to enslavement of the minds of an entire population.

Congratulations, as an enforcer of New Speak, you have become a member of the Thought Police
.
.

My subtle (and quite clever, if only I think so :D) luring statement had its intended purpose, as you've just been ensnared by it, contradicted yourself...and proved me correct. :thumbup:

You're trying to equate a fictional novel, whereby incorrect thoughts/speech are actually 'illegal'...and are therefore punishable as a 'crime.'
'
Whereas, as I plainly stated (or at least I thought it was pretty plain :oops: )...no such thing exists in in this great country.

Soooo, your poor attempt at equating George's story as one that parallels our current society...is totally off-base and not even close. :ohdear:

Meaning of course, the only ramifications of continuing to use those words/phrases/statements that show a complete lack of manners and decency, will only invoke and earn ridicule/lack of respect/disgust...NOT any type of judicial action.



Quote:

Originally Posted by Carl in Tampa (Post 1405514)
1984 is worthy of reading and serious contemplation.

Methinks you may want to read 1984 again. ;)

Maybe better luck next time though. :ho:



Deepest Sincere Wishes: :wave:

Carl in Tampa 05-31-2017 10:53 PM

Think again.... or, for the first time.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ColdNoMore (Post 1405522)
My subtle (and quite clever, if only I think so :D) luring statement had its intended purpose, as you've just been ensnared by it, contradicted yourself...and proved me correct. :thumbup:

You're trying to equate a fictional novel, whereby incorrect thoughts/speech are actually 'illegal'...and are therefore punishable as a 'crime.'
'
Whereas, as I plainly stated (or at least I thought it was pretty plain :oops)...no such thing exists in in this great country.

Soooo, your poor attempt at equating Goerge's story as one that parallels our current society...is totally off-base and not even close. :ohdear:

Meaning of course, the only ramifications of continuing to use those words/phrases/statements that show a complete lack of manners and decency, will only invoke and earn ridicule/lack of respect/disgust...NOT any type of judicial action.


Methinks you may want to read 1984 again. ;)

Maybe better luck next time though. :ho:

Deepest Sincere Wishes: :wave:

Well, no.

The point of my original posting was that Political Correctness was a precursor to an era predicted by Orwell. Not that I was, in your words, "...equating Goerge's (sic) story as one that parallels our current society."

In fact, my exact words in my original post stated that the book, "...was predictive of a future that we are fast approaching." (Please read my posts with precision.)

We are not yet at the point in the USA where some words and attitudes are illegal, BUT......THEY ARE IN CANADA. In addition, they are illegal in Denmark, France, The Netherlands, the United Kingdom, Germany, Russia, Ireland, Sweden, and Finland.

Mexico now treats homophobic slurs as unprotected speech. You cannot be arrested for such speech, but you can be sued.

South Africa's new Hate Crimes bill forbids “prejudice, bias or intolerance” on the basis of race, gender, sexual orientation, religion, gender identity, etc. (It’s a long list.) It also calls out those who “stir up violence against or bring into contempt or ridicule” anyone on the basis of their beliefs or occupation — that includes government officials. Political cartoonists are particularly targeted.

I have not contradicted myself. I have merely pointed out that with the acceptance of Political Correctness of speech our culture is moving toward the one predicted by George Orwell, who was, by the way, an Englishman, and the novel 1984 was depicted as taking place in Socialistic England. Ingsoc (Newspeak for English Socialism or the English Socialist Party) is the political ideology of the totalitarian government of Oceania.

You really should read it.

Steve9930 06-01-2017 10:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carl in Tampa (Post 1405548)
Well, no.

The point of my original posting was that Political Correctness was a precursor to an era predicted by Orwell. Not that I was, in your words, "...equating Goerge's (sic) story as one that parallels our current society."

In fact, my exact words in my original post stated that the book, "...was predictive of a future that we are fast approaching." (Please read my posts with precision.)

We are not yet at the point in the USA where some words and attitudes are illegal, BUT......THEY ARE IN CANADA. In addition, they are illegal in Denmark, France, The Netherlands, the United Kingdom, Germany, Russia, Ireland, Sweden, and Finland.

Mexico now treats homophobic slurs as unprotected speech. You cannot be arrested for such speech, but you can be sued. 6

South Africa's new Hate Crimes bill forbids “prejudice, bias or intolerance” on the basis of race, gender, sexual orientation, religion, gender identity, etc. (It’s a long list.) It also calls out those who “stir up violence against or bring into contempt or ridicule” anyone on the basis of their beliefs or occupation — that includes government officials. Political cartoonists are particularly targeted.

I have not contradicted myself. I have merely pointed out that with the acceptance of Political Correctness of speech our culture is moving toward the one predicted by George Orwell, who was, by the way, an Englishman, and the novel 1984 was depicted as taking place in Socialistic England. Ingsoc (Newspeak for English Socialism or the English Socialist Party) is the political ideology of the totalitarian government of Oceania.

You really should read it.

Fiction often becomes reality. While others may think you are incorrect to think a fictional novel will become a reality only need to look at what is acceptable today versus 50 years ago. PC culture is as dangerous as any other limiting idea which strives to limit personal expression based only in secular wisdom.

Polar Bear 06-01-2017 11:17 AM

Imo, hate-filled name calling, and use of terms that are clearly offensive in the eyes of almost all rational human beings, has nothing to do with PC. The attempt to equate the two is an attempt to legitimize PC by those who support it.

manaboutown 06-01-2017 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Polar Bear (Post 1405712)
Imo, hate-filled name calling, and use of terms that are clearly offensive in the eyes of almost all rational human beings, has nothing to do with PC. The attempt to equate the two is an attempt to legitimize PC by those who support it.

:agree:

rubicon 06-01-2017 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toymeister (Post 1405006)
I am a Department of Defense employee. This year I had to take transgender sensitivity training. That is not a joke. You paid me to take that PC training. I was and am offended. You should be as well. It is impossible to please everyone,political correctness has gone too far.

Teachers are instructing/indoctrinating young kids into this LGBT thing as a civil right and as normal. a drag queen is teaching about transgenders in a NY library and we wondr why ids grow up troubled. Sex education ought to be left to parents.

Personal Best Regards:

Sandtrap328 06-01-2017 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rubicon (Post 1405734)
Teachers are instructing/indoctrinating young kids into this LGBT thing as a civil right and as normal. a drag queen is teaching about transgenders in a NY library and we wondr why ids grow up troubled. Sex education ought to be left to parents.

Personal Best Regards:

Yes, the " LBGT thing" IS a civil right. The Supreme Court has decided that same sex marriage is legal.

Sex education ought to left to parents.:loco: Yeah, that has worked so well. :a20:

graciegirl 06-01-2017 01:08 PM

///


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:31 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.