Originally Posted by JMintzer (Post 2053445)

As opposed to heterosexual behavior, which is completely disease free and and has not a single unnatural nor odd kink...

Originally Posted by montagnard1969 (Post 2053454)

These “woke” people think EVERYONE MUST accept the way they wish to live and identify themselves. They are doing so to FORCE those who do not believe in this nonsense to accept these new terms and descriptions. When I grew up the word “queer” meant just that; unusual, homosexual [both male and female], abnormal and the list goes on. NOW we must submit to believing in the “woke” lifestyle because THEY SAY we must.
Take this example; companies must hire a diverse workforce in all levels of their worker structure. This means they do not get to hire the best candidate with the best qualifications, but the one who identifies as the correct gender, skin color, ethnic background. The thinking is WE MUST comply with the wishes of the few to satisfy their requirements.
Now let’s look at sports; how many Hispanic, gender identifiers, white, Asian, Pacific Islanders and other groups are represented in the NBA or the NFL? Looks hypocritical to me and the excuse is “they sign the best talent to support the team”. Why then are companies not allowed to do the same? This is pure and utter garbage. I don’t care how someone else lives until these same groups try to shove this crap down my throat!!!
Unfortunately, the Catholic Church has offended ALL its members with this same garbage. They have allowed and covered up the pedophilia that has transpired for YEARS, then hides their finances in order to avoid paying damages to those they were abused. What a bunch of utter hypocrites. All that knew or should have known should be imprisoned and be sexually sanitized.

Originally Posted by coffeebean (Post 2053512)

Well, heterosexual behavior in healthy individuals, (even the kinky stuff) can produce an offspring. Homosexual sex can not create a pregnancy. That right there explains a lot.

Originally Posted by mtdjed (Post 2053521)

As the original poster, I have to apologize for using a Vatican article to bring up the non-Binary term. It really is the term that I was addressing.

Again, my thoughts are that we all were conceived to start out as male or female. What comes later by desire, medicine, operation, etc does not negate the male, female, he, she definitions. If a male desires to call himself non-Binary, fine. He is still a male. I do not feel compelled to use his definition. I was only trying to address the non-Binary definition.

Originally Posted by coffeebean (Post 2053512)

Well, heterosexual behavior in healthy individuals, (even the kinky stuff) can produce an offspring. Homosexual sex can not create a pregnancy. That right there explains a lot.

Originally Posted by triflex (Post 2053530)

If a woman finds that her 'man' is really into that kinky stuff all the time then maybe she should ask herself a few questions.

Originally Posted by JMintzer (Post 2053548)

What about when it's the woman who's the "kinky" one?

Originally Posted by triflex (Post 2053549)

Buy some penicillin from Costco.

Originally Posted by JMintzer (Post 2053543)

Which has ZERO to do with the conversation... Don't know how that explains anything, but thanks for the tip!

But it does beg the question, how often does heterosexual behavior in TV produce offspring?

Originally Posted by JMintzer (Post 2053553)

Why?