Exactly!! Libtards do not care about the law unless they are the victims.

Sure,sure, I see we have another history failure. Enlighten us with your research that supports what you said. Like how many did we lose in each war, especially the ones started by a Democrat(most of the big ones). It is amazing how you can take someone's comment and pick a small part of a sentence to go off on. Why don't you bring something to the table instead of filling your plate at the expense of everyone else? After all, you insist on getting recognition for your small minded barbs you cast about like a flailing chicken.

Yes I feel better now that you realize your mistakes.

"I want Hillary, who blatantly with intent put our country in danger by mishandling classified to be punished for her violations. "

Its funny, the repub lynching committee could find anything but I guess you know more than they do. Pathetic repub

So for example World War 2, we should have just sat back and watched from the sidelines. The Iraq war started by bush43 was ok even though the "homeland" was not attacked by Iraq. Pitiful repub thinking.

They were indirectly responsible, Hilary and Obama are directly responsible for his and her subordinates.

It has every thing do with it when evidence was destroyed. Aysfdycst.

You do realize that you are full of it, right?

There was plenty of evidence, and even the FBI director said so. And I do feel that the fix was in, especially since they questioned her without advising her of her rights. That means that anything she said cannot be used against her in court. On the other hand, just the stuff released on the Internet as coming from her server is enough to indict her. So, please don't expect others to be as stupid as you. Some of us come from areas of experience if not expertise. And indictment does not mean a conviction, but it does mean that the person stands trial for accusations. No indictment does not mean a person is not guilty. A person not indicted can be brought up on charges at any time in the future. And she should be charged. With just what I know right now, without all the additional evidence that the feds have on her, I could get convictions on at least three statutory violations. Not to mention that she should NEVER have a security clearance again. And how does one serve as president if she could not have access to classified material. She would not even be able to be in the same room as the nuclear "football." So, yes this administration IS corrupt as well as unconstitutional. If the president was not black, he would have been impeached. As it is, if anything like that happened, there would be mass racial riots in the streets like the ones when MLK was murdered.

Your post makes no sense whatsoever.

And Right Wing
 

screwballs like you will tell any lie they can come up with to make Hillary look bad. No evidence whatsoever that her server was hacked, but you can't help yourself.

Would you mind
 

translating this post in to English?

How can anyone possible make any negative statement about Hillary that is NOT true? She is guilty of just about every conceivable misdeed one could find documented or imagined. Hillary needs no help looking bad.

I did not say that her server was hacked, but the FBI said it probably was and that it security was worst on it than Gmail's security. Now, if you really want to analyze it, we already know that she emailed Amb Steven's travel itinerary, and we know that the enemy knew where he was going to be when they attacked. HE was NOT at the embassy, remember? How did they find out? SO, it really is plausible that her server could have been hacked. On the other hand, an ambassador's travel is classified and she had it on an unclassified system. I know because I transmitted many messages and I know that his travel was supposed to be classified with a designated code word, which I will not mention because that is a sensitive issue.

So, you can get up in a huff, get all excited because the first possible female president is a criminal and a disloyal piece of garbage all you want, but it doesn't change the fact that she really is that bad. And what really takes the cake is that you liberals know she is that bad and still defend her and will boost her up to a position way beyond her ability. Why? Why? Because you are what I justifiably label "Libtards." It is not a derogatory term, and yet not intended to be flattering either.

Compared to Trump
 

she is a saint.

More likely the opposite......

You, a retired clerk-typist, think you know so much about the inner workings of the State Dept. Just sit back, collect your retirement, and be happy that President HILLARY will not prosecute you for your doing nothing for years except to occupy space.