Posted by Guest (Post 1259243)

You do realize that you are full of it, right?

There was plenty of evidence, and even the FBI director said so. And I do feel that the fix was in, especially since they questioned her without advising her of her rights. That means that anything she said cannot be used against her in court. On the other hand, just the stuff released on the Internet as coming from her server is enough to indict her. So, please don't expect others to be as stupid as you. Some of us come from areas of experience if not expertise. And indictment does not mean a conviction, but it does mean that the person stands trial for accusations. No indictment does not mean a person is not guilty. A person not indicted can be brought up on charges at any time in the future. And she should be charged. With just what I know right now, without all the additional evidence that the feds have on her, I could get convictions on at least three statutory violations. Not to mention that she should NEVER have a security clearance again. And how does one serve as president if she could not have access to classified material. She would not even be able to be in the same room as the nuclear "football." So, yes this administration IS corrupt as well as unconstitutional. If the president was not black, he would have been impeached. As it is, if anything like that happened, there would be mass racial riots in the streets like the ones when MLK was murdered.

Posted by Guest (Post 1259106)

She was defending a mother's right to say how she wants her son remembered.
I can understand how that doesn't help your first interests.

Posted by Guest (Post 1259326)

Archie Bunker had a word for people like YOU.

MEATHEAD

Posted by Guest (Post 1259324)

You, a retired clerk-typist, think you know so much about the inner workings of the State Dept. Just sit back, collect your retirement, and be happy that President HILLARY will not prosecute you for your doing nothing for years except to occupy space.

Posted by Guest (Post 1259243)

You do realize that you are full of it, right?

There was plenty of evidence, and even the FBI director said so. And I do feel that the fix was in, especially since they questioned her without advising her of her rights. That means that anything she said cannot be used against her in court. On the other hand, just the stuff released on the Internet as coming from her server is enough to indict her. So, please don't expect others to be as stupid as you. Some of us come from areas of experience if not expertise. And indictment does not mean a conviction, but it does mean that the person stands trial for accusations. No indictment does not mean a person is not guilty. A person not indicted can be brought up on charges at any time in the future. And she should be charged. With just what I know right now, without all the additional evidence that the feds have on her, I could get convictions on at least three statutory violations. Not to mention that she should NEVER have a security clearance again. And how does one serve as president if she could not have access to classified material. She would not even be able to be in the same room as the nuclear "football." So, yes this administration IS corrupt as well as unconstitutional. If the president was not black, he would have been impeached. As it is, if anything like that happened, there would be mass racial riots in the streets like the ones when MLK was murdered.

Posted by Guest (Post 1259422)

The above 3 Posts were all written by the same person who goes by the name " " CNM " -- Cold No More

Apparently they hail from a Northern " Rust Belt State " which has been run into the ground by decades of Dem Rule .
So then she moves down here and expects to be able to bring her losing philosophy with her and attack well educated experienced successful people with her Government Knows Best religion .
She does not respect your right to disagree with her and her ilk . She and her kind will only be happy when the entire country is controlled by a single Political Party .

Posted by Guest (Post 1259518)

No, the responses in posts 33 and 34 were mine, not CNM. Please don't confuse my comments with that idiot.

Posted by Guest (Post 1259373)

Ha, ha, if you have observed my comments, you would not suggest that I am a retired clerk typist. By the way, the State Dept does not have that position anyway. They call them Office Managers now. Actually, I worked in telecommunications or as some call it Information Management. I was required to be an expert on classified material handling, since I was in charge of ALL classified at the embassy, and its destruction. But, I am sure that you know more than me, with your what??? background? And yes, unfortunately I was required to have some clearances revoked because a few were careless with classified material. And those were accidental in nature.

Posted by Guest (Post 1259555)

Posted by Guest (Post 1259555)

Posted by Guest (Post 1259555)