When your messiah in the White House and wacko Clinton can shut up after these incidents about guns being the culprit for anything wrong maybe I'll not have to point out that there are millions of guns in America and I have yet to learn of a criminal gun that went out and killed someone. I was also pointing out that it's interesting that the majority of wacko's that go on a shooting spree are generally from the left. Maybe because the left is generally morally and ethically challenged? Without faith they have nothing to live for? Without faith, they may not have a conscience? Just an observation.

Did he go out with the intention of killing people?

Did you have a point? "..SC church,.. Fox news.. and walk lock step?" A coherent thought would be useful in a conversation.

Did you have a point? "..SC church,.. Fox news.. and walk lock step?" A coherent thought would be useful in a conversation.

That's right. A coherent thought would be useful. So, try to make one. Take a look at post 42. His point is that all mass murders are young liberals.

Second point was in response to another post in this thread. It was asked how times did Fox News report people lives were saved a person that helped an unarmed person? The liberal press would never report this type of incident. He referred to America Rifleman reports not Fox News. Deductive reasoning, the conclusion would be Fox News is part of the liberal press, because neither treat people that saving another person life is news worthy.

Is your memory that bad, that you can't remember any post here , but the one before yours? That is so sad, that I feel sorry for you.

It sounds as though you are either approving of the retired police captain's killing the man who tossed popcorn on him or defending hus actions. Which is it and why?

If I were the poster and I am not, I would say neither. You have wrongly restated the post to reflect how you view or want the results. Providing a choice of two, neither of which addresses the posts objective.

I will allow there are differing aspects from different folks.

Then there are those who by design ignore the original intent and try to re-state the issue to focus in another direction entirely. (I am not saying that was what was done.)

I do not conclude approval or defending from the post in question.

The question was about intention......nothing more.

It really gets old when posters make these kind of questions with ONLY two answers when they KNOW they are just trying to set you up. Are people actually this shallow ?

Sounds like the President speaking...it is his habit to do that also (either this plan or war).

More rambling. But, you did get you intended attention. Now, do you have a point, or what? You have my permission to disagree with me, but please don't bore me to death with your liberal diversions from reality. :icon_bored:

My intention was for me to get your head out of your ass, but I failed. It is to imbedded in the Republican insistence that they are not responsible for anything. Any statement they made is well thought out like only young liberals commit mass murders. Anybody with a brain could see that.

Diversions from reality! Mr. Happy Face, Mr. Boring, Mr. Laugh at Anything, Mr. Clap Hands, you win the prize for the person most likely to contribute nothing to any thread. Keep it up. It suits you well. By the way, you don't bother me in the slightest. So, keep firing your worthless cheap shots, you might actually hit something some day, but I doubt it.

Let me respond to my own post. More rambling. I just took the words right out of your mouth. Now, go scratch your head, and come up with another cheap shot.

'He' is a she. Staunch supporter of the Second Amendment.

Have you ever been diagnosed with anger issues? Believe it or not, the thread was a statement regarding the shooting and the accusation of persons being "racists." You do seem to exaggerate a bit regarding my "insistence" that Republicans are not responsible for anything. On the other hand, if the Dems want to take credit for all their failed but partisan passed bills in the last two terms, they do set themselves up for that kind of rhetoric. I am so relieved that I don't bother you in the slightest. I would be very concerned if I thought that I had upset you......not really. 8^)

Did the NRA send a free membership to the families of the slain reporter and the camera man?

Maybe they would also include a copy of the second amendment suitable for framing.

Here is a question for you: Did you send them a sympathy card?

As a matter of fact, yes. Sent it c/o the television station in Roanoke.

You?