Talk of The Villages Florida

Talk of The Villages Florida (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/)
-   The Villages, Florida, Political talk (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-political-talk-88/)
-   -   Donald Trump and the 2nd Amendment. (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-political-talk-88/donald-trump-2nd-amendment-193392/)

Guest 05-16-2016 09:10 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1227703)
Exposing ignorant racists, is always worth the time and effort.

If you consulted a PC expert you would quickly learn that they do not like the use of the word Oriental they would instruct you that the correct word is now " Asian " .

They actually equate the same disdain for Oriental as they and most people would have for the " N" word.
You can as they say look it up .

And Oh by the way in terms of your efforts to identify and stamp out racism on this site . Thank-you for your service !

Guest 05-16-2016 09:24 PM

negroids and orientals
You have now entered the Twilight Zone.

Guest 05-17-2016 04:51 AM

It appears that once again the liberals have diverted from the subject of the thread when losing the discussion/debate. Interesting how the 2nd Amendment has turned into a bait and trap by the liberals using "racism" as their common tool of choice. Apparently, they are still having a problem trying to discern the difference between the first and second Amendment.

In order to gain leverage on the discussion by utilizing the "racism" ploy, first you have to have an audience that gives a rats @ss about your PC. Using factual terms that are technically correct, are not the same as racial slurs even if one perceives the descriptor as a personal affront. If these terms are not utilized with the intent to slur, then your huffing a puffing in false indignation is just plain stupid, to put it politely. It seems that it is never the subject of the perceived slur that is complaining, but a simple minded liberal that must take up the mantel of false injury and run with it.

You are the same idiots that use such terms as "angry old white men" or " tea ba**ers" or whatever you believe will anger a poster that you do not agree with. Racism is a lame attempt to turn the conversation away from the subject. Why don't you liberals on the left call up the ghost of Senator Byrd, grand dragon of the KKK and Democrat, cherished by the left and see what he might have to say about "racism?"

Your accusations of "racism" is getting boring and tedious. Try to use your imagination and come up with a factual argument to dispute someone's view rather than diverting from the subject.

Guest 05-17-2016 04:52 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1227716)
negroids and orientals
You have now entered the Twilight Zone.

Thought you might be lonely and in need of company.

Guest 05-17-2016 08:42 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1227744)
Thought you might be lonely and in need of company.

Thank-you - What year is this?

Guest 05-17-2016 08:45 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1226644)
Most welfare recipients are white. :boom:

How connected to 2nd Amendment???

Guest 05-17-2016 08:50 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1227847)
How connected to 2nd Amendment???

He did say BOOM--2nd amendment right to yell BOOM without a license

Guest 05-17-2016 09:05 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1227852)
He did say BOOM--2nd amendment right to yell BOOM without a license

:thumbup:

Guest 05-17-2016 09:19 AM

Oh no, Tumup agrees. I must be slipping.

Guest 05-17-2016 09:24 AM

As if any real thinking person would even care what a "PC expert" thinks.

All that means is they are better at not saying or doing what is right.

One step below a politician and a politician is looking up at the curb!!!!!

Guest 05-17-2016 09:28 AM

When PC becomes law, I might consider watching my language. Until they repeal the first Amendment, PC is what I do not intend to incorporate into my lifestyle.

Guest 05-17-2016 09:45 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1227881)
As if any real thinking person would even care what a "PC expert" thinks.

All that means is they are better at not saying or doing what is right.

One step below a politician and a politician is looking up at the curb!!!!!

They should be looking up at roots...or down from the gallows.

Guest 05-17-2016 10:51 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1227875)
Oh no, Tumup agrees. I must be slipping.

:thumbup:...:thumbup:

Guest 05-17-2016 11:14 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1227889)
When PC becomes law, I might consider watching my language. Until they repeal the first Amendment, PC is what I do not intend to incorporate into my lifestyle.

We are in real need of more brave stout hearted true Americans than this generation / era of " pansies and panty-waists " our education system has been turning out for the past decade + .

Guest 05-17-2016 02:50 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1227969)
We are in real need of more brave stout hearted true Americans than this generation / era of " pansies and panty-waists " our education system has been turning out for the past decade + .

The vast majority of teachers are women. The vast majority of liberals are women. It's not rocket science.

They were all taught the woman's view. Told to be gentle. Passive. But that's NOT what boys/men are. We're aggressive, mean, uncaring...but we're GREAT at making things, new things, helpful things. We're essential and being bred out of existence.

Guest 05-17-2016 02:53 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1228112)
The vast majority of teachers are women. The vast majority of liberals are women. It's not rocket science.

They were all taught the woman's view. Told to be gentle. Passive. But that's NOT what boys/men are. We're aggressive, mean, uncaring...but we're GREAT at making things, new things, helpful things. We're essential and being bred out of existence.

negroids, orientals, pansies and panty waistes\

You got the whole country figured out. This is 2016. Were you in a coma all this time?

Guest 05-17-2016 03:04 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1228116)
negroids, orientals, pansies and panty waistes\

You got the whole country figured out. This is 2016. Were you in a coma all this time?

Hey, I am the one that used the term "orientals" in a past posting. I didn't use the other terms, but I do concur with the use, if spelled properly....:)

Guest 05-17-2016 03:06 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1228116)
negroids, orientals, pansies and panty waistes\

You got the whole country figured out. This is 2016. Were you in a coma all this time?

I would ask you if your mother threw away the baby and kept the afterbirth, but that would not be polite. Apparently, that is not a factor that you consider when you post your two cents.

Guest 05-17-2016 03:13 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1228116)
negroids, orientals, pansies and panty waistes\

You got the whole country figured out. This is 2016. Were you in a coma all this time?

No...I've been telling people that the country is ready to implode with the white population becoming the minority. I've been trying to save the country from becoming 3rd world via lies and deception. Via the breeding us out.

You've been in the coma, unaware of the insisious changes going on around you.

Can you name a place that is truly better now than in the 50s or early 60s?

Diversity has destroyed this country. It's destroying Europe. Someone wants everyone stupid.

Guest 05-17-2016 03:13 PM

Hard to believe
 
I can't believe I'm in The Villages, Florida after reading this forum! People trying to talk themselves out of sounding racist when actually people are all one race, humans, homo sapiens. Such hatred and anger, from people supposedly here to relax and enjoy life. None of these people can be Christians and talk like this, yet seem to hold themselves out as religious folks. I'm ashamed that thoughts like these make it to print, in a forum from here. People talking hatred about gays, pansies and Blacks and Asians is disgusting and embarrassing for this community, where we should be above these kinds of thoughts, being mature adults.

Guest 05-17-2016 03:27 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1228147)
I can't believe I'm in The Villages, Florida after reading this forum! People trying to talk themselves out of sounding racist when actually people are all one race, humans, homo sapiens. Such hatred and anger, from people supposedly here to relax and enjoy life. None of these people can be Christians and talk like this, yet seem to hold themselves out as religious folks. I'm ashamed that thoughts like these make it to print, in a forum from here. People talking hatred about gays, pansies and Blacks and Asians is disgusting and embarrassing for this community, where we should be above these kinds of thoughts, being mature adults.

Well, according to the Bible, we are all sinners. I didn't expect The Villages to be a convent when I moved down here. But, I do get where you are coming from. I do think that you are taking it to the extreme though, because if you go to the other forums on this site you will see more courteous folk. This is politics. If everyone agreed, there would be no need for different political parties. I doubt anyone takes the opposing views on here, seriously.

Guest 05-17-2016 03:35 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1228147)
I can't believe I'm in The Villages, Florida after reading this forum! People trying to talk themselves out of sounding racist when actually people are all one race, humans, homo sapiens. Such hatred and anger, from people supposedly here to relax and enjoy life. None of these people can be Christians and talk like this, yet seem to hold themselves out as religious folks. I'm ashamed that thoughts like these make it to print, in a forum from here. People talking hatred about gays, pansies and Blacks and Asians is disgusting and embarrassing for this community, where we should be above these kinds of thoughts, being mature adults.

That's the big lie. Look around anywhere, do they live the same as "we" do? Do they act the same? Have the same values? Norms? Music? Education? Do we have anything in common? Besides a scientific name?

We're angry about the future that has been deceptively forced upon us that will gravely affect our grandchildren. We WILL be the minority in our own country in one generation. From the age of 6 down we already are the minority. You have no idea how much things are going to change...no idea. If you did, you'd join me trying to stop it.

Adults CAN talk about such matters. Got some FACT to share to back up your outrage?

Guest 05-17-2016 03:41 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1228147)
I can't believe I'm in The Villages, Florida after reading this forum! People trying to talk themselves out of sounding racist when actually people are all one race, humans, homo sapiens. Such hatred and anger, from people supposedly here to relax and enjoy life. None of these people can be Christians and talk like this, yet seem to hold themselves out as religious folks. I'm ashamed that thoughts like these make it to print, in a forum from here. People talking hatred about gays, pansies and Blacks and Asians is disgusting and embarrassing for this community, where we should be above these kinds of thoughts, being mature adults.

Who said anything bad about Asians . Are you referring to the uninformed soul-less people who called them " Orientals " ?

Guest 05-17-2016 03:44 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1228147)
I can't believe I'm in The Villages, Florida after reading this forum! People trying to talk themselves out of sounding racist when actually people are all one race, humans, homo sapiens. Such hatred and anger, from people supposedly here to relax and enjoy life. None of these people can be Christians and talk like this, yet seem to hold themselves out as religious folks. I'm ashamed that thoughts like these make it to print, in a forum from here. People talking hatred about gays, pansies and Blacks and Asians is disgusting and embarrassing for this community, where we should be above these kinds of thoughts, being mature adults.

Just Not Lest Ye Be Judged !

Guest 05-17-2016 05:08 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1228164)
Who said anything bad about Asians . Are you referring to the uninformed soul-less people who called them " Orientals " ?

Are Asians NOT oriental? I have lived in Asia and have never heard of anyone being upset over the word Oriental. I am not going to apologize for not being PC, when I did it without malice. I was raised not to use the "n" word and I don't. At least I never did until Obama made race an issue. And I have only used it once in regards to him. I have too much respect for those in my family and my friends to use that word carelessly. You do know that NOT all Asians are Oriental, right? So, when using the term Oriental, it is describing an ethnic group, not a place. If I say he is an American, he could be from North America or South America, black, Latino or white. If I say African American, you know that normally a person is referring to a black. So, get over your PC, especially when a person is describing something. Homosexuals do not wish to be called Homos....I get it. You have transsexuals and you have transvestites. You have blacks and you have the old term of colored. You have the term black and African American used interchangeably.

This is too long and has nothing to do with the second Amendment. Just another diversion incorporated by the left to get away from the subject.

Guest 05-17-2016 05:51 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1228212)
Are Asians NOT oriental? I have lived in Asia and have never heard of anyone being upset over the word Oriental. I am not going to apologize for not being PC, when I did it without malice. I was raised not to use the "n" word and I don't. At least I never did until Obama made race an issue. And I have only used it once in regards to him. I have too much respect for those in my family and my friends to use that word carelessly. You do know that NOT all Asians are Oriental, right? So, when using the term Oriental, it is describing an ethnic group, not a place. If I say he is an American, he could be from North America or South America, black, Latino or white. If I say African American, you know that normally a person is referring to a black. So, get over your PC, especially when a person is describing something. Homosexuals do not wish to be called Homos....I get it. You have transsexuals and you have transvestites. You have blacks and you have the old term of colored. You have the term black and African American used interchangeably.

This is too long and has nothing to do with the second Amendment. Just another diversion incorporated by the left to get away from the subject.

It's a word, the others are just words. Even when you substitute another word, everyone giggles because they know what word you MEAN. They don't want us to make our own opinions because we'll come to the "wrong" conclusion. That's why they tell us what to think.

Guest 05-17-2016 06:28 PM

In Vietnam, they weren't orientals and they weren't Asians. They were called Charlie or G**Ks.

Guest 05-17-2016 06:30 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1228250)
In Vietnam, they weren't orientals and they weren't Asians. They were called Charlie or G**Ks.

Thank you for your service ! :beer3:

Guest 05-18-2016 09:57 AM

Mencken reports the earliest use of the word gook: he wrote that US marines occupying Nicaragua in 1912 took to calling the natives gooks and that it had previously been a term for Filipinos.[11] He further mentions that the natives of Costa Rica are sometimes called goo-goos.[12] The first written use was in 1920 and mentions that the marines occupying Haiti used the term to refer to Haitians.[13] US occupation troops in Korea after World War II called the Koreans "gooks".[14] After the return of US troops to the Korean peninsula, so prevalent was the use of the word gook during the first months of the Korean War that US General Douglas MacArthur banned its use, for fear that Asians would become alienated to the United Nations Command because of the insult.[1][15][16] Although mainly used to describe non-European foreigners, especially Asians, it has been used to describe foreigners in general,[17] including Italians in 1944, Indians, Lebanese and Turks in the '70s, and Arabs in 1988.[4] This dual usage is similar to the offensive word wog in British English.
In modern US usage, "gook" refers particularly to Communist soldiers during the Vietnam War. It is generally considered to be highly offensive.

Guest 05-18-2016 10:46 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1228446)
Mencken reports the earliest use of the word gook: he wrote that US marines occupying Nicaragua in 1912 took to calling the natives gooks and that it had previously been a term for Filipinos.[11] He further mentions that the natives of Costa Rica are sometimes called goo-goos.[12] The first written use was in 1920 and mentions that the marines occupying Haiti used the term to refer to Haitians.[13] US occupation troops in Korea after World War II called the Koreans "gooks".[14] After the return of US troops to the Korean peninsula, so prevalent was the use of the word gook during the first months of the Korean War that US General Douglas MacArthur banned its use, for fear that Asians would become alienated to the United Nations Command because of the insult.[1][15][16] Although mainly used to describe non-European foreigners, especially Asians, it has been used to describe foreigners in general,[17] including Italians in 1944, Indians, Lebanese and Turks in the '70s, and Arabs in 1988.[4] This dual usage is similar to the offensive word wog in British English.
In modern US usage, "gook" refers particularly to Communist soldiers during the Vietnam War. It is generally considered to be highly offensive.

Thank you Mr. Wikipedia. :read:

Guest 05-18-2016 11:06 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1228472)
Thank you Mr. Wikipedia. :read:

You're welcome. I never know what I'm going to look up and learn each day. The posts go in many different directions.

Guest 05-18-2016 11:15 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1228479)
You're welcome. I never know what I'm going to look up and learn each day. The posts go in many different directions.

Even though Wiki has had some accuracy issues, I find it very informative and interesting. But, remember when you use factual information, you have a tendency to shut down good blather. :)

Guest 05-18-2016 11:42 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1228485)
Even though Wiki has had some accuracy issues, I find it very informative and interesting. But, remember when you use factual information, you have a tendency to shut down good blather. :)

blath·er
ˈblaT͟Hər/Submit
verb
1.
talk long-windedly without making very much sense.
"she began blathering on about spirituality and life after death"
synonyms: prattle, babble, chatter, twitter, prate, go on, run on, rattle on, yap, jabber, maunder, ramble, burble, drivel, blabber, gab; More
noun
1.
long-winded talk with no real substance.

The blather is funny at times. I don't think it will stop altogether.

As for Wikipedia being reliable I found this advice.


"How will you know if a citation is credible?

That’s where judgment comes in. There are too many factors to list here, but a citation is more likely to be legitimate if it comes from an academic source, has statistics to back up its claim, or is a quote directly from a source. Many times you won’t be able to get access to the first-hand material because it’s not widely available online (as in the case of many academic journals) or it’s from a book. In this case, your best bet is getting hold of that work or searching for it online."
Is Wikipedia Reliable? Here Are Some Tips on How to Find Out

Guest 05-18-2016 12:20 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1228500)
blath·er
ˈblaT͟Hər/Submit
verb
1.
talk long-windedly without making very much sense.
"she began blathering on about spirituality and life after death"
synonyms: prattle, babble, chatter, twitter, prate, go on, run on, rattle on, yap, jabber, maunder, ramble, burble, drivel, blabber, gab; More
noun
1.
long-winded talk with no real substance.

The blather is funny at times. I don't think it will stop altogether.

As for Wikipedia being reliable I found this advice.


"How will you know if a citation is credible?

That’s where judgment comes in. There are too many factors to list here, but a citation is more likely to be legitimate if it comes from an academic source, has statistics to back up its claim, or is a quote directly from a source. Many times you won’t be able to get access to the first-hand material because it’s not widely available online (as in the case of many academic journals) or it’s from a book. In this case, your best bet is getting hold of that work or searching for it online."
Is Wikipedia Reliable? Here Are Some Tips on How to Find Out

:thumbup:


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:11 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.