Talk of The Villages Florida
Page 3 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Talk of The Villages Florida (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/)
-   The Villages, Florida, Political talk (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-political-talk-88/)
-   -   A good day! (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-political-talk-88/good-day-44813/)

Guest 11-10-2011 09:48 PM
Quote:
Posted by Guest (Post 416481)
And it is posts like this that perpetuation the delusion that women who make the choice to abort are somehow inferior to those who do not. Telling a women that she kills her conscience? Maybe she is concerned about providing for the children she already has and that is on her conscience....If abortions do become illegal, it will not stop them...it will stop them from being safe. And I am talking about the old back door abortions, not the ones performed in clinics by a medically trained person..

And once again...you have NO right to make this decision for any woman. It is not your decision to make. You don't like government meddling in people's lives except for this most personal and private of decisons.....
Ignoring the life within the mother again. You were once that life. I don't have to say anything else.

Guest 11-10-2011 11:15 PM
Quote:
Posted by Guest (Post 416494)
It is not just the woman involved, it is the father, the baby and God. You make it sound like the "woman" only has the right to determine life and death. What a selfish opinion!!!
Her body...her decision.

Guest 11-10-2011 11:16 PM
Quote:
Posted by Guest (Post 416272)
I really wouldn't take much from Mother Theresa. I know I'll catch flak for this but that woman was sufferring from SOMETHING. All those hospitals she set up? Why are patients denied pain medication? Why are they denied visitation? Because Mother Theresa thought it put them closer to godliness to suffer 'like Christ did on the cross'.

And her charities? When her charity was forced by a new law in France to publicly disclose their books, they packed up and left.

Not too many people looked beyond the image that was being carefully cultivated - but sometimes, the truth leaks out:

http://www.newstatesman.com/200508220019
I did not know any of that. Very interesting. Thank you for sharing this information.

Guest 11-10-2011 11:41 PM
Quote:
Posted by Guest (Post 416610)
Her body...her decision.
Again, a selfish attitude. It is the decision of the father, mother and God. The female carrier of the child is not the only soul involved.

Guest 11-11-2011 08:28 AM
Quote:
Posted by Guest (Post 416610)
Her body...her decision.
Surprised that such an accomplished doctor of research can continue to blatantly ignore the fact that the unborn child, complete with it's own distinctly different and seperate set of DNA, is not "her body"...
Lame arguements like this are designed to gain the emotional and sympathetic support of the masses who have not been taught the facts yet. Hmmm....another undesireable intent from reputable honest researcher.:oops:

Guest 11-11-2011 08:48 AM
Quote:
Posted by Guest (Post 416669)
Surprised that such an accomplished doctor of research can continue to blatantly ignore the fact that the unborn child, complete with it's own distinctly different and seperate set of DNA, is not "her body"...
Lame arguements like this are designed to gain the emotional and sympathetic support of the masses who have not been taught the facts yet. Hmmm....another undesireable intent from reputable honest researcher.:oops:
Of course you are correct. The unborn baby genetic code differs entirely from the mother's. It's not part of the woman's body. The baby merely resides in the mother's womb. It is not a physical part or organ belonging to the mother. So, I would say, the mother's "right" to "control her own body" ends at the edge of the womb.

I know I'm not speaking from what has become legal in this country, but just what is pure fact and what is moral.

Guest 11-11-2011 08:55 AM
Quote:
Posted by Guest (Post 416677)
Of course you are correct. The unborn baby genetic code differs entirely from the mother's. It's not part of the woman's body. The baby merely resides in the mother's womb. It is not a physical part or organ belonging to the mother. So, I would say, the mother's "right" to "control her own body" ends at the edge of the womb.

I know I'm not speaking from what has become legal in this country, but just what is pure fact and what is moral.
:eclipsee_gold_cup: :eclipsee_gold_cup: :eclipsee_gold_cup: :eclipsee_gold_cup:

Guest 11-11-2011 09:05 AM
Quote:
Posted by Guest (Post 416669)
Surprised that such an accomplished doctor of research can continue to blatantly ignore the fact that the unborn child, complete with it's own distinctly different and seperate set of DNA, is not "her body"...
Lame arguements like this are designed to gain the emotional and sympathetic support of the masses who have not been taught the facts yet. Hmmm....another undesireable intent from reputable honest researcher.:oops:
You cannot legislate morality. I guess I was too concrete in my original statement, so let me expand so you might understand. When I said her body, her decision, I assumed you understood that implied that she took into consideration the input of the father and her doctor. It is still her body and her decision. Your statement puts women on the level of being incubators.
We will never come to a common ground on this issue and I think this constant repartee is useless.....

Guest 11-11-2011 09:13 AM
Quote:
Posted by Guest (Post 416689)
You cannot legislate morality. I guess I was too concrete in my original statement, so let me expand so you might understand. When I said her body, her decision, I assumed you understood that implied that she took into consideration the input of the father and her doctor. It is still her body and her decision. Your statement puts women on the level of being incubators.
We will never come to a common ground on this issue and I think this constant repartee is useless.....
Of course it's useless to continue this "repartee", as you say, as long as you continue to ignore the biological facts of a pregnancy.

Guest 11-11-2011 09:17 AM
Quote:
Posted by Guest (Post 416689)
You cannot legislate morality. I guess I was too concrete in my original statement, so let me expand so you might understand. When I said her body, her decision, I assumed you understood that implied that she took into consideration the input of the father and her doctor. It is still her body and her decision. Your statement puts women on the level of being incubators.
We will never come to a common ground on this issue and I think this constant repartee is useless.....
More lame statements meant to appeal to the emotional responses and place the mother to be in the "poor me, victim, help me out of this mess category"...
If the constant repartee is useless, why do you continue to initiate &/or engage?

Guest 11-11-2011 09:42 AM
Quote:
Posted by Guest (Post 416693)
Of course it's useless to continue this "repartee", as you say, as long as you continue to ignore the biological facts of a pregnancy.
How would you react to people who would be biologically correct in referring to the fertilized egg as a blastocyte or, to use a term that is correct but has some emotional charge to it - a parasite?

Guest 11-11-2011 09:44 AM
Quote:
Posted by Guest (Post 416677)
Of course you are correct. The unborn baby genetic code differs entirely from the mother's. It's not part of the woman's body. The baby merely resides in the mother's womb. It is not a physical part or organ belonging to the mother. So, I would say, the mother's "right" to "control her own body" ends at the edge of the womb.

I know I'm not speaking from what has become legal in this country, but just what is pure fact and what is moral.
:bigbow::bigbow::bigbow:

Guest 11-11-2011 09:47 AM
Quote:
Posted by Guest (Post 416701)
How would you react to people who would be biologically correct in referring to the fertilized egg as a blastocyte or, to use a term that is correct but has some emotional charge to it - a parasite?

A rose is a rose is a rose...A rose by any other name would still smell wonderfully sweet!

Guest 11-11-2011 09:53 AM
Quote:
Posted by Guest (Post 416272)
I really wouldn't take much from Mother Theresa...

And her charities? When her charity was forced by a new law in France to publicly disclose their books, they packed up and left.

[/url]
Who cares what the French think about Blessed Mother Teresa?

..."Abortion kills twice. It kills the body of the baby and it kills the conscience of the mother. Abortion is profoundly anti-women. Three quarters of its victims are women: Half the babies and all the mothers."
Blessed Mother Teresa of Calcutta

Guest 11-11-2011 09:58 AM
~"Those who supported slavery were free. Those who support abortion are already been born. That's how opression works." (Ronald Reagan)


~"...is it surprising that today we have become so morally blind (for wickedness blinds) that we save the baby whales at great cost, and murder millions of unborn children?"
(Alice von Hildebrand)


~"It is a poverty to decide that a child must die so that you may live as you wish."
(Blessed Mother Teresa)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:49 AM.
Page 3 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.