Talk of The Villages Florida

Talk of The Villages Florida (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/)
-   The Villages, Florida, Political talk (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-political-talk-88/)
-   -   London elects Muslim mayor (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-political-talk-88/london-elects-muslim-mayor-192698/)

Guest 05-10-2016 04:57 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1224305)
President Obama held both McCain and Romney to under 200 electoral votes. (google it, it was in all the newspapers)

Only six presidents in US history have won back to back elections with over 50% of the vote. Obama did just that. The last president to do it was Eisenhower...Clinton didn't do it, Reagan didn't do it.

Again google is your friend. You might learn something. We are lucky to be living in this historic period...six presidents in over 240 years.

I did google it and as I stated, he not even listed in the top ten.

Guest 05-10-2016 05:56 PM

President Obama is enjoying an approval rating of over 50 percent. At the same time in his term of office, Crapweasel had an approval rating in the 20's.

Amazing that the Dumpublicans think they can win the Presidency when the current President is quite popular AND Trump has a 70 percent DISAPPOVAL rating among all women.

Remember, the angry old white man vote is negated by the minority vote, the gay and lesbian vote, the female vote, and the college educated males under 50.

Cry in your prune juice, old angry white men.

Guest 05-10-2016 05:59 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
President Obama is enjoying an approval rating of over 50 percent. At the same time in his term of office, Crapweasel had an approval rating in the 20's.

Amazing that the Dumpublicans think they can win the Presidency when the current President is quite popular AND Trump has a 70 percent DISAPPOVAL rating among all women.

Remember, the angry old white man vote is negated by the minority vote, the gay and lesbian vote, the female vote, and the college educated males under 50.

Cry in your prune juice, old angry white men.

Trump's approval rating will improve once Hillary is indicted.

Guest 05-10-2016 06:06 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
President Obama is enjoying an approval rating of over 50 percent. At the same time in his term of office, Crapweasel had an approval rating in the 20's.

Amazing that the Dumpublicans think they can win the Presidency when the current President is quite popular AND Trump has a 70 percent DISAPPOVAL rating among all women.

Remember, the angry old white man vote is negated by the minority vote, the gay and lesbian vote, the female vote, and the college educated males under 50.

Cry in your prune juice, old angry white men.

Go take a flying :censored: on your rolling donut....best we can come up with for a continual sexist!

Guest 05-10-2016 06:23 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1224340)
Go take a flying :censored: on your rolling donut....best we can come up with for a continual sexist!

Ah, your lack of intelligence is showing again! chilout

You may recognize me as I am driving my golf cart throughout The Villages with my HILLARY placard in the windshield. Of course, there are many, many of us HILLARY fans with placards in the golf cart. :thumbup:

Guest 05-10-2016 07:10 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1224348)
Ah, your lack of intelligence is showing again! chilout

You may recognize me as I am driving my golf cart throughout The Villages with my HILLARY placard in the windshield. Of course, there are many, many of us HILLARY fans with placards in the golf cart. :thumbup:

Too funny....so your the ONE ignoramus
with the Hilliard placard
!:gc:

Guest 05-10-2016 07:52 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1224308)
I did google it and as I stated, he not even listed in the top ten.

Prove it.

Guest 05-10-2016 07:59 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1224377)
Prove it.

Are you too stupid to google it for yourself...typical liberal idiot.

Guest 05-10-2016 08:04 PM

Christians want the same
 
Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1222735)
The problem is that the ultimate goal of ALL Muslims is the establishment of a world wide Caliphate without borders. They are a very patient people and will stop at nothing to achieve their objectives. Witness the drowning of Christians in rivers. I don't have a bias against their "religion", I have a bias against their actions in the name of their "religion".

Isn't making everyone Christian also the goal of Christianity? Maybe we are not aggressive enough about this goal?

Guest 05-10-2016 08:13 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
President Obama is enjoying an approval rating of over 50 percent. At the same time in his term of office, Crapweasel had an approval rating in the 20's.

Amazing that the Dumpublicans think they can win the Presidency when the current President is quite popular AND Trump has a 70 percent DISAPPOVAL rating among all women.

Remember, the angry old white man vote is negated by the minority vote, the gay and lesbian vote, the female vote, and the college educated males under 50.

Cry in your prune juice, old angry white men.

Good to know. There are no Black, Gay, Lesbian and few female Republicans. I had no idea.

Guest 05-10-2016 08:25 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1224382)
Good to know. There are no Black, Gay, Lesbian and few female Republicans. I had no idea.

Very few minority, gay, lesbian, or female Republicans. Google it.
Oh, that's right, you don't know how to Google information. :BigApplause:

Guest 05-10-2016 08:32 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1224386)
Very few minority, gay, lesbian, or female Republicans. Google it.
Oh, that's right, you don't know how to Google information. :BigApplause:

You might want to learn the difference between the terms "no" and "Very few". Perhaps you can Google it.:D

Guest 05-10-2016 08:51 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1224391)
You might want to learn the difference between the terms "no" and "Very few". Perhaps you can Google it.:D

You might want to read the posts. It stated that the angry old white man vote will be negated by the minority vote, the gay and lesbian vote, the female vote, and the college educated male voters under 50.

By negating, it simply means the angry old white man vote is outnumbered by those other blocs - not that there are none of the gays, etc. who vote Republican - but you knew that.

Remember also, the electoral votes are what is counted. The urban areas have the concentration of the Democratic voters. Sumter County and the angry old men will not be part of the equation. It is Miami-Dade, Jacksonville, Orlando, and Tampa-Clearwater that count.

Guest 05-10-2016 08:56 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1224308)
I did google it and as I stated, he not even listed in the top ten.

Sure you did. You do this **** all the time, what a liar. You make up facts and fake research and if someone calls you on it, you turn it around and tell them they're lazy.

Guest 05-10-2016 09:06 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1224399)
sure you did. You do this **** all the time, what a liar. You make up facts and fake research and if someone calls you on it, you turn it around and tell them they're lazy.

Attachment 59669

Guest 05-10-2016 09:11 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1224401)

Since you are either too lazy or too stupid (or both) to use Google, I provided the attachment just for you.

Guest 05-10-2016 09:16 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1224399)
Sure you did. You do this **** all the time, what a liar. You make up facts and fake research and if someone calls you on it, you turn it around and tell them they're lazy.

Now that you've viewed the attachment, I'll bet you really feel like and idiot now, don't you?

Guest 05-10-2016 09:39 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1224405)
Now that you've viewed the attachment, I'll bet you really feel like and idiot now, don't you?

President Obama held both McCain and Romney to under 200 electoral votes. (google it, it was in all the newspapers)

Only six presidents in US history have won back to back elections with over 50% of the vote. Obama did just that. The last president to do it was Eisenhower...Clinton didn't do it, Reagan didn't do it.

Again google is your friend. You might learn something. We are lucky to be living in this historic period...six presidents in over 240 years.



That was the point you were disputing. Your pdf does not contradict the post. Does it?

Guest 05-10-2016 09:40 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1224190)
What's your final solution?

They need to go or the country is lost to them. That's the only "solution". There are too many of them, they're the new majority from age 6 down.

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1224382)
Good to know. There are no Black, Gay, Lesbian and few female Republicans. I had no idea.

Wish there were none of the first three period.

Guest 05-10-2016 09:48 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1224409)
President Obama held both McCain and Romney to under 200 electoral votes. (google it, it was in all the newspapers)

Only six presidents in US history have won back to back elections with over 50% of the vote. Obama did just that. The last president to do it was Eisenhower...Clinton didn't do it, Reagan didn't do it.

Again google is your friend. You might learn something. We are lucky to be living in this historic period...six presidents in over 240 years.



That was the point you were disputing. Your pdf does not contradict the post. Does it?

No idiot, that was NOT the point I was disputing. I was disputing the OP's claim that Obama won two landslide elections. I stated that he was NOT even in the top ten. I stand by that statement and provided a list to support that statement.

Guest 05-10-2016 09:54 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1224413)
No idiot, that was NOT the point I was disputing. I was disputing the OP's claim that Obama won two landslide elections. I stated that he was NOT even in the top ten. I stand by that statement and provided a list to support that statement.

You might want to read post #77.

Guest 05-10-2016 10:13 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1224413)
No idiot, that was NOT the point I was disputing. I was disputing the OP's claim that Obama won two landslide elections. I stated that he was NOT even in the top ten. I stand by that statement and provided a list to support that statement.

Originally Posted by Guest View Post
President Obama held both McCain and Romney to under 200 electoral votes. (google it, it was in all the newspapers)

Only six presidents in US history have won back to back elections with over 50% of the vote. Obama did just that. The last president to do it was Eisenhower...Clinton didn't do it, Reagan didn't do it.

Again google is your friend. You might learn something. We are lucky to be living in this historic period...six presidents in over 240 years.
I did google it and as I stated, he not even listed in the top ten.
Are your words in boldface?
You are disputing and earlier post. Not the one above attached to your post. You made an honest [but stupid] mistake. The next time attach your response to the post you are addressing. In this case post 77.

Guest 05-10-2016 10:28 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1224281)
Landslide victories? Hardly. He isn't even listed the the top ten.
Maybe he is listed in the top ten in your 'liberal' dictionary.:D

In the post you quoted, post #80, you conveniently omitted the above post which was also include in post #80. So,my remarks the you highlighted in bold print were in response to my quote which was omitted...an honest (but stupid) mistake on your part. Apology accepted.

Guest 05-10-2016 10:33 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1224429)
In the post you quoted, post #80, you conveniently omitted the above post which was also include in post #80. So,my remarks the you highlighted in bold print were in response to my quote which was omitted...an honest (but stupid) mistake on your part. Apology accepted.

Here is post 80:

Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Landslide victories? Hardly. He isn't even listed the the top ten.
Maybe he is listed in the top ten in your 'liberal' dictionary.

President Obama held both McCain and Romney to under 200 electoral votes. (google it, it was in all the newspapers)

Only six presidents in US history have won back to back elections with over 50% of the vote. Obama did just that. The last president to do it was Eisenhower...Clinton didn't do it, Reagan didn't do it.

Again google is your friend. You might learn something. We are lucky to be living in this historic period...six presidents in over 240 years.

Guest 05-10-2016 10:58 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1224432)
Here is post 80:

Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Landslide victories? Hardly. He isn't even listed the the top ten.
Maybe he is listed in the top ten in your 'liberal' dictionary.

President Obama held both McCain and Romney to under 200 electoral votes. (google it, it was in all the newspapers)

Only six presidents in US history have won back to back elections with over 50% of the vote. Obama did just that. The last president to do it was Eisenhower...Clinton didn't do it, Reagan didn't do it.

Again google is your friend. You might learn something. We are lucky to be living in this historic period...six presidents in over 240 years.

What is your point? Your post #102 did not include post #77 which was originally part of post #80. And my response "I did google it and as I stated, he not even in the top ten." (which you highlighted in bold print in post #102) was clearly in response to that part of my original quote (post #77) highlighted in bold print above.

Guest 05-10-2016 11:05 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1224438)
What is your point? Your post #102 did not include post #77 which was originally part of post #80. And my response "I did google it and as I stated, he not even in the top ten." (which you highlighted in bold print in post #102) was clearly in response to that part of my original quote (post #77) highlighted in bold print above.

Originally Posted by Guest View Post
President Obama held both McCain and Romney to under 200 electoral votes. (google it, it was in all the newspapers)

Only six presidents in US history have won back to back elections with over 50% of the vote. Obama did just that. The last president to do it was Eisenhower...Clinton didn't do it, Reagan didn't do it.

Again google is your friend. You might learn something. We are lucky to be living in this historic period...six presidents in over 240 years.
I did google it and as I stated, he not even listed in the top ten.
Are your words in boldface?
You are disputing and earlier post. Not the one above attached to your post. You made an honest [but stupid] mistake. The next time attach your response to the post you are addressing. In this case post 77.

Guest 05-10-2016 11:18 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1224410)
They need to go or the country is lost to them. That's the only "solution". There are too many of them, they're the new majority from age 6 down.
Wish there were none of the first three period.

Where will you send them? If they refuse to go, what will you do to them?

Wish there were none of the first three period.
Can you rephrase this sentence? It's not clear.

Guest 05-11-2016 07:48 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1224441)
Where will you send them? If they refuse to go, what will you do to them?

Wish there were none of the first three period.
Can you rephrase this sentence? It's not clear.

That's the point...the country is lost, it's gone, the future is a 3rd world full of dirty idiots living in dirty places. We can't and won't just deport 100 million people. But those 100 million are responsible for the death of this nation.

We let them immigrate into and breed us out of our country. We encouraged THEM to have children while encouraging whites NOT to have children. There have probably been 50 million abortions in the US since it was legalized in the 60s. Minorities don't get abortions, those were white children. That is a reason why there's a new majority from 1st grade down.

You know darn well what it meant...I wish the country looked like the villages, 99.9% pure. We'd have a LOT less problems. Diversity destroys.

Guest 05-11-2016 08:00 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1224529)
That's the point...the country is lost, it's gone, the future is a 3rd world full of dirty idiots living in dirty places. We can't and won't just deport 100 million people. But those 100 million are responsible for the death of this nation.

We let them immigrate into and breed us out of our country. We encouraged THEM to have children while encouraging whites NOT to have children. There have probably been 50 million abortions in the US since it was legalized in the 60s. Minorities don't get abortions, those were white children. That is a reason why there's a new majority from 1st grade down.

You know darn well what it meant...I wish the country looked like the villages, 99.9% pure. We'd have a LOT less problems. Diversity destroys.

Yo crack ho momma done raized herself a moron.

Guest 05-11-2016 08:08 AM

Diversity is a phony term for political leverage.

Anybody who thinks it is any more than that is hooked on kool aide!

Guest 05-11-2016 08:09 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1224534)
Yo crack ho momma done raized herself a moron.

And that's EXACTLY why this country is headed to destruction. The inner city crack ho's and their offspring are becoming the majority. Because we pay them to have kids.

Look it up..."minority" children, blacks and Hispanics are the MAJORITY of school enrollments.

It's Official: The U.S. is Becoming a Minority-Majority Nation | US News

This does NOT bode well...

Guest 05-11-2016 08:35 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1224540)
And that's EXACTLY why this country is headed to destruction. The inner city crack ho's and their offspring are becoming the majority. Because we pay them to have kids.

According to the link you provided the black crack ho is not so much of the cause...

Parents who identified their child as white with Hispanic origin were the largest minority, making up 22 percent of the 19.9 million children under age 5, followed by African American children, who make up 15 percent.

Again here is the cause of the demographic change...

The "two or more races" population is projected to be the fastest-growing group over the next 46 years, with its population expected to triple in size. The Census breaks down the "two or more races" category as white combining with any other race, i.e. American Indian, Alaska native, Asian and black.

So tell your kids to breed with their own!

Guest 05-11-2016 08:59 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1224548)
According to the link you provided the black crack ho is not so much of the cause...

Parents who identified their child as white with Hispanic origin were the largest minority, making up 22 percent of the 19.9 million children under age 5, followed by African American children, who make up 15 percent.

Again here is the cause of the demographic change...

The "two or more races" population is projected to be the fastest-growing group over the next 46 years, with its population expected to triple in size. The Census breaks down the "two or more races" category as white combining with any other race, i.e. American Indian, Alaska native, Asian and black.

So tell your kids to breed with their own!


That's NOT what the media and government and schools are preaching, they preach the opposite...multiracial is the best.

We're either not having kids or aborting them.

The Hispanics are breeding us out of our own country. The blacks are along for the ride as whitey loses control. Asking for more and more special privilege.

The only "white privilege" is the smarts we're born with. The ambition, the drive, the ingenuity, the vision. That's our only "advantage". That's why they NEED quotas and affirmative action. They can't compete equally.

Guest 05-11-2016 10:19 AM

This thread began with the citizens of London electing a Muslim mayor. The thread has gone to white supremacist KKK rantings.

If you members of the Ku Klux Klan really believe the neo-Nazi crap you are spouting, you are the ones who should be driven out of the country.

Guest 05-11-2016 10:23 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1224564)
That's NOT what the media and government and schools are preaching, they preach the opposite...multiracial is the best.

We're either not having kids or aborting them.

The Hispanics are breeding us out of our own count ry. The blacks are along for the ride as whitey loses control. Asking for more and more special privilege.

The only "white privilege" is the smarts we're born with. The ambition, the drive, the ingenuity, the vision. That's our only "advantage". That's why they NEED quotas and affirmative action. They can't compete equally.

The racist Gang of Three is just talking and answering themselves. They should be very glad there is freedom of speech. In Singapore, they would be caned. I would pay to see that!

Guest 05-11-2016 10:28 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1224548)
According to the link you provided the black crack ho is not so much of the cause...

Parents who identified their child as white with Hispanic origin were the largest minority, making up 22 percent of the 19.9 million children under age 5, followed by African American children, who make up 15 percent.

Again here is the cause of the demographic change...

The "two or more races" population is projected to be the fastest-growing group over the next 46 years, with its population expected to triple in size. The Census breaks down the "two or more races" category as white combining with any other race, i.e. American Indian, Alaska native, Asian and black.

So tell your kids to breed with their own!

It would be hilarious to have one of your children or grandchildren marry someone of a different race. Would you disown them?

Now, that is assuming you have children or grandchildren- because you might be a racist gay man married to another racist gay man. :thumbup:

Guest 05-11-2016 10:42 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1224605)
It would be hilarious to have one of your children or grandchildren marry someone of a different race. Would you disown them?

Now, that is assuming you have children or grandchildren- because you might be a racist gay man married to another racist gay man. :thumbup:

You won't have to worry about gay marriage once we have sharia law. Embrace your Muslim brothers and sisters and be saved.

Guest 05-11-2016 10:46 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1224601)
This thread began with the citizens of London electing a Muslim mayor. The thread has gone to white supremacist KKK rantings.

If you members of the Ku Klux Klan really believe the neo-Nazi crap you are spouting, you are the ones who should be driven out of the country.

"Our" culture is gone, being replaced by a 3rd world minority "culture" and you STILL don't see it.

More black/brown kids are being born than white kids. From the age of 6 down, whites are the minority.

We're doomed and you fiddle.

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1224605)
It would be hilarious to have one of your children or grandchildren marry someone of a different race. Would you disown them?

Now, that is assuming you have children or grandchildren- because you might be a racist gay man married to another racist gay man. :thumbup:

We knew the truth up until the 60s when the destruction of "the west" and it's culture began to be actively destroyed.

Now EVERYWHERE is sliding into 3rd worldism. The dregs are breeding us out.

Guest 05-11-2016 10:46 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1224617)
You won't have to worry about gay marriage once we have sharia law. Embrace your Muslim brothers and sisters and be saved.

Glad you and your racist gay partner have come out of the closet.

Guest 05-11-2016 10:59 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1224621)
Glad you and your racist gay partner have come out of the closet.

My partner is female, and by birth too. As far as the other poster on here that may be racist, that is his prerogative. I realize that the left wishes to ban all first amendment rights, but until the liberal supreme court makes that decision, we still have that right. Personally, I am not intimidated by the gays. I have friends and some family members that are gay and I get along just fine with them. They don't push their thoughts on the issue on me, and I don't smack them down. It is a mutual agreement so that they don't get hurt. As far as being a racist is concerned, I will assume that you are an idiot and should be given some slack for being mentally retarded. I have yet to say anything racist. On the other hand, it is easy to assume you to be an idiot from your comments.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:06 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.