Not true. Obie got over half the votes, not from half the registered voters. There is a big difference. Not all registered voters turned out to vote, just a little over half of them did. Of those registered voters that turned out to vote, he got a little over half. Only 54.2% turned out to vote and Obama received 51.1% of those votes. That means that Obama received less than 27% of the total registered voters. Only 65% of Americans are registered to vote so that means that only 17% of America supports Obama. That means that when you attempt to deceive people with this big majority of Americans support that amateur, you are totally wrong. Less than 2 out of 20 Americans support Obama by way of vote.

Bush also had one of the highest approval ratings, of 86 in 2001 to Obama's highest approval rating of 65 in 2009 (which went down after that). So, Bush's ratings may have gone down, but Obama's have never been as high as Bush's. As a matter of fact, last summer Bush's approval ratings were higher than Obama's. Both have about the same overall average though.

So, bait all you want, but anyone can post numbers to suit their agenda.

So much gibberish. You didn't address my post.

"Just remember that Obama did not have the majority of Americans voting for him. Only the majority of voters that voted. Hardly half the registered voters. So, bark a few more lines for us, rover."

I've heard a lot of lame rebuttals, but this one takes first place. I suppose elephants fly also. lol

So, show us where Pres. Obama EVER had an approval rating LOWER than the 22 percent held by George W.

Don't need to. Obama has never risen as high in approval as Bush. Bush had circumstances that had his approval drop and then it has risen again. On the other hand, Obama has NEVER matched Bush's approval height. But, to be honest with you, they both have had the same overall average approval rating. AVERAGE. So, drop all the details and numbers you wish. For every little number that someone has told you, I can bring up a corresponding, equal number to oppose it. It's all in how you handle the numbers. But, the one that wins is the one that does the research for the facts, not what a pundit tells them. And, we have all fallen into that trap. Another reason Snopes is so popular, as well as other fact checkers.

You are either being naieve, or not knowledgeable about the appropriate protocol as established precedent

"precedent" By who's rule? Yours?

Never mind. I forgot we were talking about Obama. And we all know that no matter what he does or says or does not do or does not say is always right......even if it is illegal.

Just ask him or any of his supporters/minions/lemmings.

You got that right. Jan 20, 2017 can't get here fast enough.

I wonder if the Obamas will steal thousands of dollars worth of property from the White House when they leave like the Clintons did when they were evicted. Those Clintons, always able to circumvent the law and get away with their crimes.

Evicted.....

Wow, the Obamas spent two(2) minutes at the Scalia showing. He flew to Africa for Mandela's funeral and gave a speech. What a scumbag, divisive excuse for a leader.

Wrong color wrong party and most of all openly disagreed with many Obama agenda items.

And unlike the long list of generals who disagreed with Obama and wound up being dismissed, Scalia's job was for life. No way for Obama to twist, spin or ignore that fact.

But he did do a great job of disparaging them(Supreme Court judges) during his state of the union speech.

You can not rehabilitate an idiot, that is you!