Posted by Guest (Post 1056219)

It is obvious by the tone and tenor of some of the posts they are not from corporate America. And if they were or are they were obviously not high enough up in the pyramid to understand or know how things sometimes work.

What if.....just what if her job was to get the company positioned to be able to "lay off thousands" (very unpopular), to close down plants (very expensive) clean up the balance sheet by dumping select assets and do the very best that could be expected while writing off or writing down these assets (all of which could be a huge hit to earnings).

She gets the job done. The current results do not look very good at all as a result of actions taken (expected). The company is now positioned to be leaner in physical as well as monetary assets, well positioned for improved financial results in the near term (?). She agrees to take the public beating that goes with the poor results. She gets $21 million to go on her merry way.

Now the above could well be a hypothesis. It could also be something akin to what really happened.

When it comes to what gets said and done at the CEO level and the board of directors level and what gets published for public consumption do not have to match. It just has to be legal or not illegal.

Just musing out loud!

The woman is more capable than Obama as a elected POTUS. She is more capable than he is today. She makes Clinton look and sound like a political dinosaur.

If Obama were measured for results.....promises made VS promised kept as they do in the corporate world, he would not have made it through a second year.....let alone 6!!!!

Posted by Guest (Post 1056219)

It is obvious by the tone and tenor of some of the posts they are not from corporate America. And if they were or are they were obviously not high enough up in the pyramid to understand or know how things sometimes work.

What if.....just what if her job was to get the company positioned to be able to "lay off thousands" (very unpopular), to close down plants (very expensive) clean up the balance sheet by dumping select assets and do the very best that could be expected while writing off or writing down these assets (all of which could be a huge hit to earnings).

She gets the job done. The current results do not look very good at all as a result of actions taken (expected). The company is now positioned to be leaner in physical as well as monetary assets, well positioned for improved financial results in the near term (?). She agrees to take the public beating that goes with the poor results. She gets $21 million to go on her merry way.

Now the above could well be a hypothesis. It could also be something akin to what really happened.

When it comes to what gets said and done at the CEO level and the board of directors level and what gets published for public consumption do not have to match. It just has to be legal or not illegal.

Just musing out loud!

The woman is more capable than Obama as a elected POTUS. She is more capable than he is today. She makes Clinton look and sound like a political dinosaur.

If Obama were measured for results.....promises made VS promised kept as they do in the corporate world, he would not have made it through a second year.....let alone 6!!!!

Posted by Guest (Post 1056437)

Find it amazing that the lefties say Fiorina and Carson aren't presidential. Guess being a community organizer and a do nothing senator does.

Posted by Guest (Post 1056437)

Find it amazing that the lefties say Fiorina and Carson aren't presidential. Guess being a community organizer and a do nothing senator does.

Posted by Guest (Post 1056495)

Not only that, it just goes to show it's not at all about elevating women or minorities at all where liberals are concerned, because if the woman or minority is not on "their team" it doesn't count. The mud slinging continues just the same. This is the crux of the real hoax that they perpetrate.

Posted by Guest (Post 1056337)

Carly Fiorina is polling at 1%. Why are we even having this discussion? It will be interesting to see how the RNC will try to get her into the debates, because she is a woman who can attack Hillary Clinton, when her poll numbers are so pitiful.

Posted by Guest (Post 1056219)

...

The woman is more capable than Obama as a elected POTUS. She is more capable than he is today. She makes Clinton look and sound like a political dinosaur.

If Obama were measured for results.....promises made VS promised kept as they do in the corporate world, he would not have made it through a second year.....let alone 6!!!!

Posted by Guest (Post 1056791)

That's what gets me ... I've worked in government, served in the military and in private industry and each had it standards you needed to meet or exceed. In short, you really did have to deliver or you would hear about it.

Someone like Obama, who is clearly all talk and no action, would never have made it to a senior rank in any of those environments based on merit. As it turned out, he was able to "talk" his way, with some help from the teleprompter, and promise a lot of gullible people the moon and they bought it. Human nature seems to be constant in every generation, because people love to hear stuff like that.

Posted by Guest (Post 1057316)

Yeah - Osama Bin Laden bought it - hook, line and sinker.

Posted by Guest (Post 1055777)

let us wait and see how long it takes for the dirt dogs to dig up what ever.