Your question seems retorical to me, or at least a very hard one to find an answer for. If I'm wrong and/or if Richie doesn't give you an answer, please do provide us with the answer for him.

As for the president's representative, they could be on the hook as you indicated. But where does the buck stop? Is the President not the chief executive, responsible for everything that happens in the White House adminiatration just as the president of most any corporation or any past president of the US? If not then we're in more trouble in this country than any of us previously thought!

Try this for more background:

thenationalpatriot.com » Blog Archive » OBAMA ELIGIBILITY COURT CASE…BLOW BY BLOW

Of course this will all blow over when it is discovered that the American born Malcolm X is Obama's real father. :duck:

All the ingredients for a delicious "swift boat" October surprise. Timing is everything. :shrug:

"I don't make jokes. I just watch the government and report the facts." -- Will Rogers

So why wasn't President Obama held in contempt of court by the Atlanta judge for ignoring a legally issued subpoena?

When the judge is a Georgia Red Neck with obvious racist intentions.

I'm through addressing all the asinine responses to the issuing of, and presidential contempt for this legally issued subpoena. As if the Georgia courts don't know how to present a subpoena. What idiocy. The Kool-Aid is just too strong and the lap dogs too busy humping the presidential leg for this to be debated with any intelligence.

So why no contempt of court charges against President Obama is a serious question which deserves a serious answer?

The whole thing is ridiculous. I find it insulting for any judge from any state to serve a sitting president. Everyone on here knows how strong I have been for Romney, but to do this silly childish bunk to a sitting US President is just plain foolish. Whats next, stop his limo for speeding on the way from the white house going to the capital building. I want an end to this silliness right now. You make us Republicans look like uneducated children.

Sitting presidents shouldn't be held accountable for their actions? Really! I guess that means that Nixon should have been held responsible for his Watergate coverups. I guess that means that Clinton should not have been held responsible for disgracing the White House with his little cigars. Where would you draw the line if not in the case of suspected fraud upon the American people. Would it be if a sitting Republican ordered that SanFranscisco be nuked because it's strongly left wing? Would it be if a sitting Democrat ordered The Villages leveled because it's strongly right wing? And YOU want to end this so called silliness RIGHT NOW!!! YOU? And by what authority would that be!!! Are you the owner of this site? :ohdear:

The Kool-Aid is really strong Sky. I can't believe the idiocy.

If this was GW they'd be screaming for impeachment and frothing at the mouth. This is one of the most incredible things I've seen on this forum.

Ain't that the truth. This kind of double standard and behavior has been happening long before Obama stole the DNC nomination out from Hillary. You'd think we'd be use to it by now! :ohdear:

Amazing that so many are turning out to be "birthers", isn't it?

Put this one behind you and march onward to find another blip.

Rant and rave all you want but the situation is resolved.

Go forth and spread your rath elsewhere to those who see you as their champions.

This post is an embarrassment. You've usually posted with much more intelligence.

Let's say you are served with a subpoena because it is thought you know something about someone else's alleged crime. But in actuality you know nothing about this supposed crime, and you barely know the person in question.

Can you just ignore the subpoena? I don't give a rat's patootie what the person is accused of, or what involvement you might have in the matter. We're just discussing the subpoena.

Why are you acting like such a dunce about this? Seriously, I'm just saying this as a friend.

LOL You guys are so funny yet have no sense of humor. :clap2:

Oh really? Then why wasn't Bush tried for war crimes or held responsible for Abu Grahib? Why wasn't LBJ tried for the same thing? Why wasn't Reagan tried for the Iran-Contra deal - no, Ollie North took the fall for that.

If the President PERSONALLY made a decision to ignore the subpoena, then you 've got the goods on him.

The reason I haven't "answered" Rickie's question is because I don't have all the facts. Or, more precisely, I don't have ENOUGH of the facts to the point that I'd feel comfortable making a leap.

So far, what I've seen is that the President's legal team seems to have dropped a ball - though I can't find any evidence of 'the other side' jumping all over it. It screams to me that there's more to this than meets the eye - but in which partisan direction, I have no idea.

Richie, I wish we could discuss this in person but I will be at a concert at Savannah Center instead of the watering hole this week. Thanks for the kind words, I do appreciate them.

I'm just guessing that the judge in Atlanta knows more about the law than RichieLion. I could be wrong. Why then did he, the judge, not hold the president in contempt of court and swear out a warrant for his immediate arrest?

Wow! Another opportunity to bash Bush for doing what Congress authorized him to do in the first place! That's another issue you've raised that I'm not going to get dragged into and besides, it's moot as to the subject at hand.

The key word here of this thread is "subpoena!" However you may have me here. I wasn't aware that Bush, LBJ and Regan were served subpoenas if in fact they were like Obama was! But then again that doesn't surprise me since most of that was before I became interested in politics through seeing first hand the shameless excessive dishonesty of left wing politicans (not that there aren't right wing dishonesty too, to a lesser degree at least) and through the dangers of the Progressive efforts of more than a century to undermine the American government and later the Democratic Party and US economy to cause the collapse of our government so they can then move in and form their vision of a socialistic government. I will digress from this because discussions of do no good and only serve to P*** me off!

BTW, it wasn't Rickie's question that you didn't answer, it was your own. I quote from your post "So why wasn't President Obama held in contempt of court by the Atlanta judge for ignoring a legally issued subpoena?" The reason I asked you to answer it if Richie didn't was to point out to you that the question was retorical and couldn't be answered by you or Richie. Neither of you are a prosecuting investigator nor a member of congress. By providing the excuse you did for not answering it confirmed that you didn't get why I asked, or you knew it was retorical before you asked it in the first place!

Despite all ths I do hope you have an enjoyable day today and ever day except for next November 6th and 7th of course! :1rotfl:

Calm down everyone. The Judge and everything around this so called legal action is a joke. Don't get so wrapped up in this. The judge is from Georgia and Obama is part black. Can't you see the connection. I assure you the justice department will look into the judges action and reason for doing so. Let the authorities sort it out and fire the idiot judge in Georgia.

1. a group of birthers led by Orly Taitz files suit to keep Pres. off GA primary ballot.
2.attorny for Dem. party in Georgia files a motion to quash the suit.
3.GA official says no,he wants a hearing.
4.Orly downloads the GA subpeona form and issues"subpeonas" to everyone on earth including the state of Hawaii where she travelled made a total fool of herself and was asked to get out.
5.the residents of birthistan have latched onto Orly "subpeonas" and are rejoicing that the Pres. of the USA will be hauled into court and admit he wasborn in Kenya,the son of Saul Alinsky and so on.
6.so why is the Pres not going to Atlanta? simple,there is no subpoena.
7.keep believing in Orly

Son of Saul Alinsky? Na! But I've heard that it will soon be proved that Obama is the son of Louis Farrakhan, an American citizen, and the whole birther issue will become history for once and for all! :evil6:

Now, this is a proper post for this silly thread. It is silly funny, so follow-on posts should also be silly funny.

Republicans can't beat President Obama on a level playing field with their loser candidates, so they first try to suppress the vote with their voter ID laws, then they try to keep him off the ballot with their phoney lawsuits. Neither tactic will work.

If Republicans can't beat Obama, it's because of the 8-10 point bump they enjoy from the liberal media, and that's without even considering the indoctrination in our educational system or the voter fraud which is rampant! If you took just the media out of the equation, Liberals would never ever win and that would be disastrous to a true and honest two party system! I'm sure though that you Democrats are tickled pink that these destructive elements benefiting the left exist!

Also Voter ID laws do not suppress votes except for the fraudulent ones! Why the left wingers are afraid of voter laws is because it makes winning elections more difficult for them!

I've only been on this political forum for a few days, and already the usual Democratic BS is getting annoying. No wonder posters here are mostly Democrats although they are a minority in TV.

and now there are all these stories about poor old people who will be disenfranchised because they don't have a picture ID!!! Why do the rest of us need a picture ID for anything and everything? I've have never been able to cast a vote without one!

I have to take exception to two comments in your above post; first "voter fraud which is rampant". The Bush administration conducted a five year study and found no voter fraud.

Second "Voter ID laws do not suppress votes except for the fraudulent ones".
Personally, I am all in favor of voter ID as long as these ID's are made available to all voters free of charge. Recently it cost me $23.00 to get the documents (birth certificate/marriage license) just to renew my Florida driver's license. This is a lot of money to some people and without the use of a computer, it would be a daunting task to get said documents.

Wait a minute...

*TAITZ* served the subpoena?

Can a citizen DO that in GA? A subpoena has to be served by, at the very least, a sheriff here in NH.

It's what photo voter ID that is accepted that is the problem. Texas, for example, will not accept a student's college photo ID but they will accept a gun license photo ID.

I totally agree with the need for a photo ID to vote, but each state must contact every voter to make sure that voter has the proper ID, and, if not, must provide one free of charge. To do otherwise would reinstate the poll tax.

I'm sorry but that disenfranchised excuse is just that.. an excuse! If someone is disenfranchised it's because they want to be disenfranchised. I dealt for years as an authority in the issuance of driver's licenses and photo ID's which was mostly managed by Democrats and liberal thinking people... and if someone what's an ID, they can get an ID. There are options for them from assistance from churches or social organization to proof of indegency from a court and other methods in between. As for your last sentence... thank God for that!

You can take exception if you want, but that doesn't come near convincing me that the fraud exists and more so on the left than on the right. I'm not gong into everything that has convinced me of this, but ask... How do so many deceased people vote? A whole lot of them do somehow. How do a whole lot of missing votes suddenly appear days after Republicans appear to be the winner of an election and that winds up turning the election around. Don't tell me it hasn't happened. It happened in one case when that Donkey Kong comedian Franken lost an election by 571 votes to Coleman in Minnesota only to be turned over well after the contest was decided when enough voted showed up in a recount to reverse the results. These few examples are most likely to be only the tip of the iceberg, so don't tell me that fraud isn't rampant, I'm not that gullible!

Getting a drivers license is expensive now a days. I've seen the prices rise over the years in the documents we issued in NY. I've also recently switch my drivers license from NY to FL when we moved down. However, people don't need pay for a drivers license to have ID for voting. States have been issuing photo ID card for years now and they're pretty inexpensive. As I said in my previous post, there are ways for the poor and elderly to get assistance if they're indigent or disabled. I'm disabled and have mobility problems and in my vast experience in that area I don't even come close to finding getting an ID a problem. If someone can't get an ID it's because they don't want to get and ID or they'r too lazy or don't want to bother being inconvenienced to take the steps the rest of us have to or had to. Even the poorest can get the money if that's the problem or even can get it waived under certain circumstances. And if someone can get to stores to shop, the bars to drink or party or the polls to vote, then they can get to wherever they need to get their ID. IMHO and with RARE exception, the disenfranchised myth is just a creation of liberals and progressives minds in our country, created for political reasons!

Skyguy...please let me tell you how happy I am to see you here in Political.


:welcome:Welcome!:welcome:

I'll see you when I see you. The family always comes first for me as well.

I'm sorry my frustration at not getting you to understand what my point was caused me to me "impolite". I took my disgust with others out on you and I'm sorry about that.

There's so much presidential butt kissing in this thread that I want to vomit. Even I didn't think the obsession with Obama was so strong that people would throw their sense of right and wrong out the window in support of all things Obama.

Do folks need an ID to collect food stamps? (or whatever they call them now).

The Judge would most likely issue a show cause summons first. The capias would follow. It would be worthless unless POTUS were extradited to Georgia on a Governor's Warrant or arrested in Georgia on, lets say, a traffic stop. Also, the Judge wouldn't be "swearing out" anything. He would simply issue.

You say you have a disability, but you have a driver's license? That's probably a big help to you getting around. I don't understand your remark about the poll tax. Are you for it or against it?
One more thing: name calling is not allowed on this site. Respect must be shown, no matter how much we disagree on issues.

Thank you for addressing Jan's question with some facts. (not that she'll accept them, believe me)

skyguy welcome but perhaps some facts to back up some of your claims.

and by the way my Taitz post was not meant to be silly,it is what happened.

You're surprised that disabled people have drivers licenses? WOW! Questioning me the way you did sounds quite disrespectful to me and all handicapped as far as I'm concerned! :ohdear:

And who said anything about a "poll tax?" If you weren't making it up, please show me where I allegedly did!

Please specify where I allegedly said anything disrespectful that was personally directed to you or to any other TOTV'er on this forum because I'm not aware of my doing so and don't think I did. If I did I'd find it more creditable if it were pointed out by a neutral party. If it's proved to me that I did disrespect you, I will apologize even though I wouldn't realize that I had. If it's not proven I'll expect an apology from you or prepare myself for a racist accusation to come next if you don't apologize! I might even file a complaint with Admin because I fully resent being falsely accused of something I didn't do, especially when it appears to be done to belittle me, intimidate me or marginalize me! Don't fail to take me seriously! :mad:

The expert has spoken. Now we just have to wait to hear on the news that President Obama has been extradited to Georgia to see if he's guilty of the charges RichieLion alleges.

I was referring to a name, which I won't repeat, that you called a sitting US Senator.

After I went back and read the post, I think I was confused by a reply you gave. Post #107 I said "To do otherwise would reinstate the poll tax". In post #108 you said "As for your last sentence...thank God for that". I realize now you were referring to a statement made by another poster and I apologize for the misunderstanding.