Talk of The Villages Florida
Page 4 of 10 « First 2 3 4 5 6 Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Talk of The Villages Florida (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/)
-   The Villages, Florida, Political talk (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-political-talk-88/)
-   -   Obama invites gays to Pope visit (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-political-talk-88/obama-invites-gays-pope-visit-163382/)

Guest 09-19-2015 09:51 AM
Quote:
Posted by Guest (Post 1116407)
I get your religious opinion and you have the right to your freedom of religion. But that does mean you get to impose your religion on the rest of us.
Oh, poor baby. Life must be tough for all the horrible things imposed on you. Where's my violin ???

That's a total red herring and you know that ... tsk tsk

Guest 09-19-2015 09:53 AM
Quote:
Posted by Guest (Post 1116414)
I notice a lot the term "silent majority" on this forum. Everybody is old enough to know where it comes from and should wonder if it might be put to rest like "sock it to me".

Silent Majority definition.
A term used by President Richard Nixon to indicate his belief that the great body of Americans supported his policies and that those who demonstrated against the involvement of the United States in the Vietnam War amounted to only a noisy minority.

https://youtu.be/8qRZvlZZ0DY
I think a better definition is people with common sense and who adhere (more or less) to the Judeo Christian norms that the country was founded on. (ps and who get upset when Obama shoots us the middle finger as he does often ...)

It's not that difficult to understand and everyone gets it ... except maybe for you.

Guest 09-19-2015 09:55 AM
Quote:
Posted by Guest (Post 1116414)
I notice a lot the term "silent majority" on this forum. Everybody is old enough to know where it comes from and should wonder if it might be put to rest like "sock it to me".

Silent Majority definition.
A term used by President Richard Nixon to indicate his belief that the great body of Americans supported his policies and that those who demonstrated against the involvement of the United States in the Vietnam War amounted to only a noisy minority.

https://youtu.be/8qRZvlZZ0DY
A couple definitions:

" a presumed moderate majority of the citizens who are too passive to make their views known"

" the majority of a country's citizens, regarded as not politically vocal, outspoken, or active."

But, if Nixon used it, then I guess liberals would consider the term NOT to be politically correct.

Guest 09-19-2015 09:55 AM
Quote:
Posted by Guest (Post 1116421)
Oh, poor baby. Life must be tough for all the horrible things imposed on you. Where's my violin ???

That's a total red herring and you know that ... tsk tsk
The same could be said about you...the War on Christians?

Guest 09-19-2015 09:56 AM
Quote:
Posted by Guest (Post 1116386)
Keep the insults coming....just makes my point!
You had a point? Or was it a complaint?

Guest 09-19-2015 09:59 AM
Quote:
Posted by Guest (Post 1116427)
The same could be said about you...the War on Christians?
Ah, the difference is there is a clear assault on Christianity with the modern day liberal "culture" media and so forth, and certainly aided/abetted by Obie amongst others.

Care to debate the obvious?

Guest 09-19-2015 10:01 AM
Quote:
Posted by Guest (Post 1116391)
Interesting Red State article. Also, I can see where some posters get there rhetoric from.

Barack Obama will go down in history as the most successful president since Abraham Lincoln... | RedState
Napoleon was successful too. So was Hitler, and Genghis Khan. I guess it's all a matter of perspective of what's a positive or negative.

Guest 09-19-2015 10:05 AM
Quote:
Posted by Guest (Post 1116407)
I get your religious opinion and you have the right to your freedom of religion. But that does mean you get to impose your religion on the rest of us.
I agree. And you have your right to whatever perversion of choice, but don't force it on the rest of us. Don't make my religion endorse your practice.

Guest 09-19-2015 10:05 AM
Quote:
Posted by Guest (Post 1116432)
Napoleon was successful too. So was Hitler, and Genghis Khan. I guess it's all a matter of perspective of what's a positive or negative.
Well, you're certainly correct in that the victors write the history.

Thus, if 50 years, we have about 37 self defined gender categories, we're about ready to convert to Islam and we're all broke, except for the environmental elites who live in coastline fortresses, I imagine we'll see Obie on Mt. Rushmore.

Guest 09-19-2015 10:09 AM
Quote:
Posted by Guest (Post 1116430)
Ah, the difference is there is a clear assault on Christianity with the modern day liberal "culture" media and so forth, and certainly aided/abetted by Obie amongst others.

Care to debate the obvious?
:thumbup:

Guest 09-19-2015 10:10 AM
Quote:
Posted by Guest (Post 1116434)
Well, you're certainly correct in that the victors write the history.

Thus, if 50 years, we have about 37 self defined gender categories, we're about ready to convert to Islam and we're all broke, except for the environmental elites who live in coastline fortresses, I imagine we'll see Obie on Mt. Rushmore.
I was told that the Mt. Rushmore idea is a no go. They did some measurements and found that there wasn't enough room for both his ego and his ears.

Guest 09-19-2015 10:34 AM
Quote:
Posted by Guest (Post 1116434)
Well, you're certainly correct in that the victors write the history.

Thus, if 50 years, we have about 37 self defined gender categories, we're about ready to convert to Islam and we're all broke, except for the environmental elites who live in coastline fortresses, I imagine we'll see Obie on Mt. Rushmore.
This year's freshman class (yes, I know the PC term for them, no I won't use it) at Univ of Maryland has to declare which gender identity they want to be referred to as. There are close to 100 choices. I think 3 choices would suffice---he, she, and it

Guest 09-19-2015 10:47 AM
ABC news quote :

"Though Pope Francis is considered an especially tolerant pontiff, senior Vatican officials are reportedly anxious “that any photos of the Holy Father with these guests at the White House welcoming ceremony next Wednesday could be interpreted as an endorsement of their activities.”

Wow, there's that term again "tolerant." I wonder if he will get called a bigot for using that word.

Guest 09-19-2015 10:58 AM
Quote:
Posted by Guest
I agree. And you have your right to whatever perversion of choice, but don't force it on the rest of us. Don't make my religion endorse your practice.
Whose asking your RELIGION to endorse anyone's practice.....

Guest 09-19-2015 11:24 AM
Quote:
Posted by Guest (Post 1116467)
Whose asking your RELIGION to endorse anyone's practice.....
The government. They are trying to make it that if churches don't marry gays then they lose their tax status.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:36 AM.
Page 4 of 10 « First 2 3 4 5 6 Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.