Wht does every aspect of Dems VS Repubs have to be......
 

win or lose?
The debates are trumped up political entertainment.
You can't belittle Palin without looking at the plethora of office holders in Washingtion who are one :cus::cusof a lot less qualified than she is.
I will take somebody who doesn't know why things have to be the way they are over some smooth talking, experienced, do nothing encumbent....in any job in DC.
Partisan opinions are just that partisan which means youe in or out dependent upon whether you are blue or red.
I for one have more latitude than that in my decision making. I do not believe the other candidate is not what ever just because they are the other candidate!!!!!!!!!!
PArtisan politics cheat America from making good decisions.
Just pull the party lever.....NO MATTER WHAT.
Doesn't take much analysis or thinking.
But is the American way......no open minds...party first! Too bad.

BTK

I agree....it is amazing the constant criticism of Gov Palin while everyone else shows their inteptness day in and day out and not a word !!!! GUESS if you do it "smoothly" it is ok and does not hurt as much !

My posts on this subject have less to do with Gov Palin than with the blindness to the ineptness we support in the name of something...party, age...dont know what but it is BLIND !! All some can see is Gov Palin !

Bless Your Heart Definition
 

Cassie...

"Bless your heart" means "You poor thing"
;)
From a native Virginian.....

OH....no wonder so many people said that to me....:1rotfl::1rotfl:

KIDDING!!!

Actually I appreciate the info....makes much more sense...thanks so much...

Heh Heh :clap2::1rotfl::clap2::1rotfl:

Tom Brokaw retired from the NBC Nightly News in 2004 at the age of 64. Then with the death of Tim Russert in June, Brokaw was named the interim anchor of Meet the Press. And Brokaw will also host the town hall meeting featuring Barack Obama and John McCain next Tuesday.

But lately, there is a growing concern over a number of activities from Brokaw that leads us to wonder whether Brokaw wouldn't be better off spending time at his Montana ranch.

This was how Brokaw ended a segment on this past Sunday's Meet the Press:

In fairness to everybody here, I’m just going to end on one note. And that is that we continue to poll on who’s best equipped to be Commander in Chief, and John McCain continues to lead in that category despite the criticism from Barack Obama by a factor of 53 to 42 percent in our latest NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll. Gentlemen, thank you very much.

Those numbers don't exist. Perhaps that isn't enough for you to consider. Let's try this Brokaw's association with the McCain campaign.

The New York Times, in profiling Brokaw before the town-hall format presidential debate, noted that Brokaw met with the McCain campaign to diffuse the right-wing rhetoric against the network.

His mission, he said, was to assure the candidate's aides that -- despite some negative on-air commentary by Mr. Olbermann in particular -- Mr. McCain could still get a fair shake from NBC News. Mr. Brokaw said he had been told by a senior McCain aide, whom he did not name, that the campaign had been reluctant to accept an NBC representative as one of the moderators of the three presidential debates -- until his name was invoked.
"My name came up, and they said, 'Oh, hell, we have to do it, because it's going to be Brokaw.' "Not quite enough for you? Well, there's a little more.
From the same piece in The New York Times, Brokaw "had "advocated" within the executive suite of NBC News to modify the anchor duties of the MSNBC hosts Keith Olbermann and Chris Matthews on election night and on nights when there were presidential debates."
Regardless of where you stand on whether Olbermann and Matthews should have been moved, the move was made in great part due to political pressure in the middle of the campaign. If Brokaw did so at the behest of the McCain campaign, or McCain himself, who Brokaw does admit to knowing socially (Brokaw doesn't know Obama socially), then his journalism credibility is damaged, not Olbermann's or Matthews'.
There is growing concern over whether Brokaw will be a fair and impartial choice to moderate the town hall style presidential debate next week.
Not that Brokaw could have been Russert, but his work on Meet the Press shows a startling lack of follow-up and aggression, which is a clear contrast to the style Russert, and Meet the Press, were famous for doing.
Brokaw was the milquetoast anchor of the Big Three in the 1980s and 1990s. Never the great reporter such as Dan Rather nor did he have the curiousity and worldliness of Peter Jennings, Brokaw was always the favorite son of the corporate media. He liked The Greatest Generation and wrote about them. He never stirred the pot, but never did anything great either.

And he could have gone off into the sunset with his reputation relatively intact. But his clear partiality for the McCain campaign and his disdain for truth-seekers may put him in the same boat with Colin Powell.

Agreed!
 

I agree with this post 100%. I adored Tim Russett. Tom Brokaw lets his partisanship show through constantly. I have been watching Meet the Press for almost 20 years and I was very sorry when Tom Brokaw stepped in for Tim Russett. There is no comparison. Tim Russet was a superb moderator and left his opinions at the door. Whether he was questioning a Democrat or a Republican, he would never let them get away without answering. I'd see him ask three or four times.

Tom Browkaw is a great disappointment and completely slanted. I'm very sorry he's the moderator for Tuesday night's debate. I wasn't thrill with Gwen Ifill either. She really didn't follow up or push. :(