No, what is dangerous is calling someone a hate-mongerer.:ohdear:

Here's what Jane Roe has to say today...Norma L. McCorvey is a healthy Christian woman. In the present day, she is an activist who speaks out against legalized, willful abortion. She was once Jane Roe of Roe versus Wade, the court case that gave abortionists legitimacy to perform the monstrous act of abortion.

“After over 28 years of guilt-induced drug binges and various jobs in abortion clinics in an attempt to justify her involvement in the legalization of abortion, Norma McCorvey did the unthinkable. As the former “poster-girl” for abortion who, in the words of a friend, “jumped off of the poster and into the arms of Christ,” Norma truly began to live her life over, and today seeks to tell the world the truth about abortion. (Roe v. Life, 2)

The belief that is propounded by various pro-abortion groups or individuals says, “Abortion is a safe medical procedure. It is a woman's right. It will not harm you physically or emotionally,” is a lie.

Reportedly, as many as Ninety-one percent of women who have an abortion suffer from a condition known as post abortion trauma. (Diane S. Drew) This is a condition, which always leads to self-doubt, severe depression, and can sometimes even lead to suicide.
http://www.catholicplanet.com/articles/article96.htm

well, you really didn't say anything much different about the Chinese situation that I did -- there's no disagreement there. As to your other point, I appreciate your point of view even though I disagree with it.

by the same token then, I assume you disagree with those who murder abortionists. Murder is murder, right?

One of my dearest friend in the whole world, Brenda who has spent many years smuggling bibles into China. I have heard this information first hand from this honest woman who has given me the honest truth. I can only tell the truth, it is up to you to consider me a liar or not. I cannot force anyone to hear the truth. Additionally, the kind Chinese people pray for Americans! The reason is that we have too many things that blind our eyes to truth, and they pray that we will not turn out like China. China was once a great Democracy that was destroyed from within similar to how we are destroying our great Democracy.

I am a psychotherapist and what you say about the psychological aftermath of abortion is quite true -- no one terminates a pregnancy easily; HOWEVER, that same aftermath occurs after rape or any other traumatic event. With proper counseling, these women go on to live psychologically healthy lives. If they do not recover it is most likely that there are other issues in their lives that they have not resolved.

I totally disagree with those who kill abortionists. Two wrongs do not make a right.

Well, your dear friend, Brenda, has a religiously biased view, yes. I am not disputing it, just calling it out.

Why is it that 90+ % of Planned Parenthood facilities are located in poverty and low income and black communities?

I can understand the trauma from rape, but why from abortion if it isn't a traumatic event? And if it is such a traumatic event, then why is that fact not presented as a possible side effect of abortion? And these post abortion effects are not small things either! I have posted data from gvernmetn studies on a previous thread this summer listing the horrendous side effects. I will try to repost.

So becausshe is a Christian, her facts cannot be considered truth?

because that is the population most in need of their services and the rent is low? All social service agencies have a presence in low income communities.

Abortion is presented as a traumatic event. I do agree that more appropriate counseling needs to be provided to patients -- but unbiased, psychological advice, not religion based.

You see, Katz -- there are two things we agree on-- lol

Seems a coincidence that the same neighborhoods being served the most by PP today are the same neighborhoods where Margaret Sanger aimed to practice her black genocide and eradication of lower intelligence populations...

If she is expressing a religious point of view that is opinion, not fact -- she certainly has the right to express her opinion, but let's not interpret that as fact.