![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Guns on the border will take care of the illegal invasion problem. |
My son and daughter-in-law work for the U.N. and deal every day with the atrocities that you describe and more. It is shocking to me that people don't really care about this situation because whether they are Canadian or American, they have won the passport lottery compared to the vast majority of people in the world.
|
Quote:
The Senate passed a bipartisan immigration bill that dies in the House. Are you staying that both parties were going against the wishes of citizens? The House didn't put it on the floor, because there was no immediate political advantage for Boehner to do it. |
Quote:
Yes, no reason for Republicans to pass, but as so often happens with party hacks, they have short memories and only work with revisionist history. "Immigration reform couldn’t pass into law when Republicans controlled the White House and Congress (in 2005-2006). It couldn’t pass when a Republican was in the White House and Democrats controlled Congress (in 2007-2008). It couldn’t pass when Democrats controlled both the executive and legislative branches (in 2009-2010). And now we officially know this after yesterday: It isn’t going to pass with a Democrat in the White House, Democrats in charge of the Senate, and Republicans in charge of the House of Representatives (2011-2014). Back in 2008 or 2012, Republicans COULD argue that President Obama didn’t make immigration reform a priority, or that he took steps to stymie reform in when he was a senator. (And 2010, in particular, the one REAL moment of the Obama first term when immigration was possible, it was Senate Democratic leaders who weren’t ready to give up the politics of the issue. And the White House didn’t fight.) " Why Immigration Reform Died in Congress - NBC News PLEASE read this. The passing by the senate was yet another ploy to make Republicans look bad; something they have been snookered with since President Obama took office. (Read his reputation in Chicago..he knows how to play the game well). Point is when you say that, you obviously have no clue. It is the political stuff that was being readied even before the Senate passed it. |
Quote:
There was information about what the Nazis were doing to the Jews during World War II. Roosevelt probably knew what was going on. We stayed out of that war until Pearl Harbor. Hell, there were congressional hearings about whether Roosevelt knew the Japanese planned to bomb Pearl Harbor, and allowed it to happen. I am really not sure were there any congressional hearing after the fact about why we invaded Iraq second time around. If there weren't how do Republicans justify 8 hearing on Benghazi? Syria did happen on Obama watch, but Iraq did have something to do with it. ISIS started in Iraq, and ISIS sent its troops into Syria to expand their sick view of the world. You want to place the blame on someone start here. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nouri_al-Maliki We are leading from behind. However, America citizens are/were tired of war. This had to affect some of Obama's thinking in the Middle East. Again, we had to deal with a bad situation, and he made it worse. The next president is going to handed the -hit sandwich, and good luck dealing with it. I will post the Wikipedia history of ISIS. It is really long. |
Quote:
The point was made by a poster and he stated why he is not proud any longer. I join in that, and it is not all about the President. We have become a nation of hypocrites. We say we care but ignored mass slaughter. We seem to only care in ripe political situations. We say we care, but are allowing our very laws to be held in contempt on everything from immigration to race to.....and this always gets my blood boiling....sanctuary cities...set up to harbor law breakers (fresh in my mind because today, the democrats voted down a bill to withhold funds from the cities protecting lawbreakers). No you ramble on..your goal appears to be to exonerate Obama and do the honorable thing...blame Bush. Nobody is aiming at Obama alone...a few instances were cited as dissapointment a, but the post you are trying to respond to is about a country that lacks respects from others, lacks respect for its own laws and seems to be just happy with it. |
Quote:
Baloney....justice for those who serve our purpose. Have a kid ? Grandchild ? Imagine that toddler of yours running for their very lives down a street, being gunned down and gassed and left to lie there while we watched and did nothing. No wonder they hate us. We ARE hypocrites with our proclamations. We will fight shadow box with ISIS, and when they reach our shores, we will expect the world to sympathize with us and help us. |
We also boost the economy of Cuba by embracing them, while they remain one of the largest violators of human rights in the world and never even asked them while we negotiated about the criminals being harbored there wanted in USA.
We also boost the economy of the largest single state sponsor of terrorism in the entire world (Iran) and negotiate but do not even ask about the americans being held there. We offered last week to talk with N Korea, who broke off talks with us on nuclear containment with no mention of conditions. I suppose this is supposed to make us a good guy or something. |
Quote:
Your continuing anti Republican theme is noted. |
Quote:
A then statement about invading Iraq TWICE. I thought we invaded only once. First Gulf War ended in Kuwait. WOW.. |
Quote:
The man isn't like you, a one trick pony. He made other points, and not the only one you referenced. When he brought up several other things not related to Syria, was he rambling? I get it. The person that responses to multiple items in one post is guilty of changing the subject, but not the person that did it first. I have no problem with his post. Why do you? He started this thread. If he wants to bring other items up, there is no problem there. You want some other examples of mass slaughter. How about Cambodia that happened during the Nixon administration? How about when Reagan turned tail, and ran, after the marine barracks was bombed in Lebanon, which made all the sense in the world? We have looked the other way, when mass slaughter has occurred in other countries by that countries leaders. This isn't something new. What was the Republicans plan for Syria three years ago, when all this started? Defending this president! Three times, I have stated that Obama took a bad situation, and made it worse. Please explain to me, how that is a defense of Obama, or placing blame on Bush! Again, try reading the entire post, and not pick on one thing that is in the post. |
Quote:
We could have walked into Bagdad(sp). Saddam knew that, and surrendered. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:42 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by
DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.