Posted by Guest (Post 1178959)

Well chi, interesting that you bring up that point. Even though you are not responding to my comment, I would like to submit my two cents regarding Hillary's so-called experience.

Hillary was first lady. Does that mean that a wife of an astronaut is experienced enough to be a member of our next space launch?

Hillary was a senator. Yes, she produced a total of THREE(3) bills that contributed absolutely nothing. So much for her senate experience.

She was SecState. Exactly what did she accomplish? The world is in worst of a state than before her, so even though I am not accusing her of being the reason, what did she do to make it less so?

Yes, Sanders has experience. But, the commie is not a viable candidate either. He stands absolutely no chance of getting elected, and even the Dems know that. That's why Bloomie is warming up in the pit....in case Killary doesn't make it to the big game.

Obama was a loser and had no job experience, other than a couple of non-productive years in the senate.

Posted by Guest (Post 1179094)

Dear Guest: In my view clinton's bona fides or lack thereof are an after thought. te fact is her dealings with foreign governents when she was Sec of State, via clinton foundation, her personal e-mail server national security breach faux pas and lack of leadership regarding Benghazi make her unworthy and unqualifed to be president

Personal Best Regards:

Posted by Guest (Post 1178950)

For his second election Obama had U.S. Senate and four years Presidential experience. Hillary was a First Lady, U.S. Senator, and Secretary of State. Sanders was a member of the U.S. House of Representatives and is a U.S. senator. Your experience argument shows a little bias, just sayin'.

Posted by Guest (Post 1179147)

The only safe, true statement about Obama and Clinton is the fact they were taking up space in those positions.

Living in the WH is a qualification to be a presidential candidate.....excuse me one moment....:1rotfl::1rotfl::1rotfl::1rotfl: