67 votes needed....end of story

With this President, the constitutional protections don't always protect. Not "the end of the story" by a long shot.

We might have to take a few long shots to get this treaty dropped. :shrug:

I hear you, and understand your concern.

Rich and fig you continue to rant and rave it seems just to rant and rave and that's your right but it takes 67 votes to ratify a treaty simple as that. What makes you think this congress that has passed nothing of significance in 2 years will all of a sudden muster enough votes to pass a treaty? I doubt you think that so it must be that you view this as another opportunity to be critical of the President.

I think that all the current crop politicans should be replaced. Not one of them has done anything for the country. They only think of themselves and are not concerned about anything else. If it would put money in their pockets there would be no problem with getting the 67 votes to rarify any treaty. Money talks, BS walks. As long as money is filling their pockets they will vote for anything and that goes for both parties. There is no, repreat no, difference between the Rs and and Ds. Neither have done right for WE THE POEPLE in anything that they have done.

So yes, I am critical of the President, the same goes for the senate and the house.

Good advice but for the record, can a third party actually report another poster ??????

I ask because they do seem, at times, to post, etc in groups !

Why do people like that even come to political ? So many obviously do not have any idea of what they are talking about..what is the point and I DO NOT MEAN ABOUT POINTS MADE THAT I DISAGREE WITH...I am speaking of those who NEVER EVER discuss an issue in any way. One or two sentences to entertain themselves or send a tweet type sentence !

Yea but remember the leadership of Iran, North Korea and the members of UN Foreign Council don't count

I just hear Barack Obama saying "Senate vote??; we doan need no Senate vote"

We just had an unconstitutional health care bill forced on us. What's different about this?........not much.

again the rant...whether you like it or not the healthcare law is the law of the land 5-4. It is constitutional. Your current posts seem to lead me to believe that you think Obama is a king with no checks and balances. Just not true. The repubs have done a great job checking most of the things he wants done.

Senator Harry Reid has done more to check Obama than any of the Repubs. His own, very own, in his pocket, leader of the senate.

BTW, the SCOTUS is not the final word and final law of the land. That belongs to the Constitution.

once again there are immigration laws that are the law of the land....and we all know how effectively that is not enforced. So why would a supporter get excited about this one. Those of us with the guns prefer it not to happen and it most likely will not.

However it is no threat to gun ownership (those that have them) what so ever.

Law of the land has come to mean nothing under the current administration. In addition to illegal immigration just review all the laws broken by our illustrious members of congress. They continue to laugh all the way to the bank as do the illigal immigrants collecting benefits paid by all of us.

btk

Rant on , dudes. Rave on. :evil6:

The bill is not now and never was constitutional. That's just a fact, and InJustice Roberts rewriting the intent of the bill to simulate constitutionality doesn't change that.

This treaty will be seen as something it's not as long as the effects are the same. Obama will do something unconstitutional and the SCOTUS will validate it and you'll agree with it because you are a total Obama sycophant, as well as a devoted disciple.

After ObamaCare, I believe he can get away with murder and you'll defend him.

Richie, Richie, Richie. I didn't know you were a consitutional law expert. The SCOTUS determines what is constitutional and what is not. At this point the ACA is constitutional. That could potentially change, but until and unless it does......get over it. :laugh: