You don't have to hold your breath on our account.

All you need to do is google why felons can't vote and get educated. - I would consider myself a graduate of Kindergarten


There is definitely a pattern; Yes, of ignorance in people who make assumptions based on opinions
Allowing illegal aliens in by the millions to get more voters.absolutely correct. However, CONSTITUTIONALLY an illegal alien SHOULD BE THROWN OUT, even arrested at a voting place for trying to commit another crime (illegal voting)
Allowing felons to vote. This is where you make ZERO sense and have nothing to back your opine
Eliminating voter id. Two way street. "Voter ID" should be a property deed and or proof of employment
Doesn't take an Einstein to figure out the agenda. Also does not take Ienstien to understand that some of your premises are patently false. I know the fact is that what you are "really" saying is that "Black people should not vote" (partly because most are liberal under-educated criminals, partly because you figure if someone is a felon they must be a black liberal)

There appear to be only 3 states that permanently disenfranchise a felon.

The other states will allow felons to vote either upon release from prison or when their parole is over.

Because that is what you said not me

I hope you have not passed your genes on to future generations. Your posts show you are definitely in the shallow end of the gene pool and you would be having reverse evolution if you had offspring. Have a banana and stop posting.

Key word "felons." Most felons don't go to jail until they have been arrested at least three or four times. But, the word "felon" should be a no brainer. A felon may have served his time, his punishment but does that mean that his ability to make good choices or reason as normal folks has improved? The reason he loses his rights is because of his mental ability to reason normally is impaired in some manner, where his judgement cannot be trusted. If a pedophile has served his sentence, would you ask him to babysit for you?

"Most", ahhh, such a typical word word for the uninformed to use.


Babysit? What would you prefer? Martha Stewart to watch your grandkids or Tyree from the projects who has never had a job and yet to be arrested for many felonies?

Hint: One is a felon, one is not.

Maybe just maybe if the term "Class A" or "Violent" was added, but in some states a Felony is smacking your kids ass in a room with a gun safe...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Oh, and I firmly beleive that you should have to be a property owner, business owner or make equal or greater than your local median income to vote. Too many people with no skin in the game voting. No issue with felons voting however if they meet the criteria.


Actually, it is "you" the liberal at the shallow end of the gene pool...that's why you're always fighting to "equalize" everything, fighting for quotas, affirmative action. Because "you" DON'T have the intellectual wherewithal to make it WITHOUT that "extra help". Am I right?

Speaking of reverse evolution. You're erasing 50,000 years of evolution. Like decades of careful breeding for the "perfect rose", only to have some fool backcross it too far back. Destroying all that careful work. YOU are condoning the reverse evolution.

A banana? A strange reference. What eats bananas?

I mostly agree with the post you commented on. People who can't run their own life without assistance, shouldn't be telling others how they should live their lives. If you want a say in things, you produce more than you take.

Only 3 states permanently disenfranchise felons. Get over it.

Neither one of them. I live in a world of choice until the commies take over. You have a very racist view and I am surprised and horrified at your racist choice of name. Not very liberal of you.

"Babysit? What would you prefer? Martha Stewart to watch your grandkids or Tyree from the projects who has never had a job and yet to be arrested for many felonies?

Hint: One is a felon, one is not. "



You live in a world of choice? You think so? How about your "choice" for president? Your "choice" is going to be between two HAND SELECTED "candidates" who will proceed to rob the public blind. If Trump gets elected, he too will initiate all kinds of programs to "fix things". Lots of money will be spent "fixing things".

A racist view? If YOU could pick just one, you'd pick Martha, I KNOW you would, and you should. It's a much smarter decision than Laquisha or whatever her name is.

That is the problem now. Mothers are working and they ARE picking Laquanda to raise their children in "daycare". Who's values do you think these kids are learning? Not yours...hers. You want to know why kids are screwed up, no respect, no common sense? Laquanda raised them. 10 hours a day, SHE was there, either ignoring them, or "teaching" them.

Minority kids already outnumber white kids in public school registrations. A new baby boom is coming, it will change everything, and not for the better. YOU let this happen. "You arrogant *******, you killed us". It's from Red Oktober I think. You killed "us" by foolishly propping "them" up. I weep for the grandchildren.

You seem to fail to understand the criteria in the question at hand. I can from that presume that your spouse was the one with the intellect to earn a place in TV. That said, come on now...answer the question. One or the other...who gets to baby sit your grandkids? Martha? Tyree? Two options...now, pick the Felon or what you presume is a black guy....


(What is wrong with the name Tyree? It is not like his name is "Marijuana Pepsi Cola Jackson" - yes, that is a real womans name)

I wonder where Oliver North fits into this conversation.

You're kidding, right? Only a liberal is so stupid to stipulate a ridiculous scenario as yours. If given a limit of your two choices, I would babysit them myself. There, how does that sit with your scheme?

If not for us conservatives, you liberals would not even exist. Someone has to babysit you from yourselves. Someone has to protect you from yourselves. It's you that wish to live in our world, not the other way around. So, go ahead with your fantasy football type Utopia of make believe, while the rest of us try to protect you from yourselves.

And you didn't fool anyone with your racist name that you inadvertently, but subconsciously used. WE KNOW what you meant.

Martha Stewart? I wouldn't give her the time of day, let alone allow her near my family.

So, go back to your defensive driving of the community forum, but try not to sabotage your own comments by revealing the REAL racist, YOU.

Well CHI, other than a diversion I doubt he does fit in. What is your point? Or, do you have a point?

I believe the other liberal is trying to equivocate ex-Con voting with babysitting children. SO, feel free to inject Col. North into the equation.

What's ironic about this discussion of Virginia enactment of restoring rights to felons is that Texas has a substantial percentage (approx 45%) of felons who gain parole whereas Virginia is less than 3% who are granted parole. so the good news is they can vote the bad news is they will probably never get out of jail so won't be able to vote.

a felon by any other name.....Felon A a career criminal who continually gets arrested for robbery/burglary. given parole he/she is likely to offend again. Felon B is DUI kills some in a car accident gets 25 years without parole is now an old guy release who will never commit a crime again.....and what about the guy who was wrongly convicted in the first place.

what the amount of fraud going on now by so called responsible citizens I don't know that restoring felon's rights makes an appreciable difference.

By the way Mc Auliffe attended Bishop Ludden Junior/Senior High School which has an outstanding academic record. If Bishop Ludden was listed on a resume it was certain the applicant would be given an employment interview because those who graduated from Bishop Ludden went to some of the best colleges in the country