Her greatest ACCOMPLISHMENT is that she flew to many countries, logging over 1,000,000 miles in the process. Wait, I misspoke....that was NOT an accomplishment, as Carly Fiorina stated, that was an "Activity"

How about winning two senate elections in New York? Would that be an accomplishment or an activity? Carly Fiorina would not know anything about winning senate elections from personal experience.

I couldn't agree more.

That tale is so old it has whiskers.

If you check the SNOPES link you will find that it is just one of many stories with the same theme.

She is now running for President.

Do you recall the story about Romney being a bully in grammar school making the news ?

I snoped the post originally because I could not believe it, but after reading just the SNOPES investigation, which I will assume with nothing contradictory is accurate, and seeing that much of it was confirmed, ESPECIALLY those confirmed by troopers and secret service agents making reports to their superiors

This is a very humorous thread. The question is NOT "why Billary is qualified to be president" but WHY anyone would be of questionable mind bent to vote for such a person of obviously major personality flaws, questionable honesty and ethically corrupt. Anyone of us with less political pull and influence as the Clintons, would have been incarcerated long ago for the laws that they have broken.

But, you are right about one thing; she IS qualified for the position. Question is, do we want someone with such a corrupt nature representing America? "Qualified?" Yes, after seeing what was elected last two terms, we have proof that anyone that's breathing and can read from a teleprompter is qualified for the position. Maybe they can't handle the job, but anyone can be elected to the job.

But - can any Republican be elected? :D

Probably not. Most Republicans believe in the American Way, not European socialism. Republicans believe in equal opportunity IF you qualify. Liberals believe that the opportunity should be adjusted so that you DO qualify.

If you are motivated then the conservative way is the best way. If you are lazy, then the liberal way is the best way. Paint it any way you wish, but that's the way it is.

Republicans believe that everyone has an opportunity and whether you take advantage of it is up to you. Liberals believe that everyone should be the same and ignores the facts that some people are more intelligent, have more ambition, take more risks, etc.

You're right, she probably is the best democrat choice!

We've seen how incompetent lawyers have been in leadership positions. Sure, they know the law(or how to circumvent it) but they don't have any idea how to run a business. Personally, I would like to see a successful business leader helping America prosper. One that brings EVERYONE up in living standard, not just the poor. If you compare many other countries' middle class, you will find that they are hardly living above our lower class. I have lived in or visited many countries of the world and believe me when I tell you, they don't have anything on us. But, we won't be like that for long if we continue down this "European Socialist" dream that our liberal leaders insist on pushing us into. Like I told one person that worked with me, "instead of being insulted by violations of PC, you should be attempting to improve one's opinion of you by improving your work ethic." No one concentrates on your ethnicity, gender or sexual orientation, when they are looking at job performance and reputation.

Instead of making history by electing the first woman president, we should be looking for the best candidate that will bring the country back together again instead of dividing it to the point of revolution. Put these kids to work and they won't be looking to join a radical terrorist group. Instead of electing the best man for president last term, you elected the first "black" president. Let's not make the same mistake again, just because Billary is female. If you are going to elect a female, find one that you can trust. And maybe this time, find someone that knows how to make money, not spend it.

I sincerely hope that she is not the BEST that Democrats have to offer.

How about Hillary Clinton raising 45 million dollars in the quarter just ended beating Barack Obama's 43 million dollars in 2011 for the same period? Would that be an accomplishment or an activity according to Carly Fiorina, who raised one million dollars?

If Fiorina makes the debate stage next month, that will be an accomplishment, but don't bet on it.

It would only impress me depending on 2 things - where did the money come from and how hard (and I might add, ethically) did one work to get it? Otherwise, the numbers are meaningless.

You're right.......that's a pretty low bar. Doesn't say much for the Democratic party.

An alarming activity. Without knowing the sources one cannot really say..
Alarming? Yes if all legitimate it confirms the democrats do not care at all about ethics, credibility, honesty or capabilities. They only care about the continuation of the hand outs and selective law enforcement and racism. The open border policy, allowing felons to vote, no voter ID requirements are all aimed at building the voter base that is invested in tcurrent hand out mode.

Alarming? Yes. We are not so slowly being outnumbered. At some point Charles Manson could be a democratic contender and as long as the party nods OK the rank and file, the lemmings, the free loaders will provide the vote.
Well maybe this is an exaggeration but it sure seems like it when one continues to witness the increasing tolerance for party first, we the people some where down the list.

Alarming? Yes!

For dogcatcher

Other than her spouse, does she have any experience "For dogcatcher?" :D

Were you just as curious about where Mitt Romney's one billion dollars came from or Barack Obama's one billion dollars came from in the general election of 2012? Or is it just a misogynistic point of view?

This is so hysterical coming from the party that thought Sarah Palin was qualified to be President of the United States.

To remain civil about the subject if the measuring bar for candidate being qualified is Clinton then by all means Palin was/is qualified.....with Clinton being of suspect character that would put Palin significantly higher in the pecking order.

Palin was Governor of Alaska and therefore had experience running a state. Clinton has no such experience.

Doesn't it bother any of the Clinton supporters that she is a liar? I personally would not vote for someone who clearly thinks I am stupid by lying repeatedly to me.

I do not think that anyone should compare Hillary Clinton's service with Ssrah Palin's service Clinton comes out the winner hands down.

The problem is that she does not tell the truth and worse than that, for me anyway, is she is a compound liar...a PROVEN compound liar, who has never apologized for any action.

Those are strong words, but it fits and of course we all know how to search to prove that fact. Even Democrats will give you that point.

The Democrats have a problem. She is it....there will be nobody else. They must support her. I certainly will withhold my critiques of her, if the democrats on the board will not come on here and profess her "wonderfulness" which is a fools errand.

Hilary and Bill
well, who wears the pants
ha ha
after Barry Husein the moslim
let s see how another Clinton POS works out for us
USA is in big trouble
but i do not think most realize it
frog in boiling water analogy
good night America how are u

I always get after the left wing troll gang, and have to tell you that your post is not funny and not welcome

well last time i checked

we have freedom of speech in USA unless the libtards have ended that for us poor idiots

Villages libs uck say

Yep. You don't have to check further.

You can post whatever you like. I may be conservative, but I do not think smart aleck cracks serve any purpose whatsoever. The forum, to my understanding, was set up to DISCUSS issues of politics and like interest.

Just me, but the kind of remark you defend are funny perhaps in some situations, and again this is just me,I would prefer adult conversation. The remarks can be seen in emails, heard at taverns or neighborhood gatherings.

When you post such things, you forfeit your right to object to the "other side" mocking comments. They serve no purpose.

free speech is a funny thing , some like it some don't.
like i just bought my first confederate flag.never wanted one before
. but when the do gooders tell me i can t have one i say up yers.
also why does amazon and nascar make them untouchable, but what about the Nazi flag and swastika, which is worse, you can buy these and fly them any where??????????

Yep, pretty funny. Even funnier is what we got instead. Goes to show ya, anyone can hold the office. But, we have seen in the last 5-6 years that not everyone can do the job.

Oh, so this really is a serious subject, and not a joke? Sorry. I thought someone was being facetious when they started this thread.

Ok, how about this?
The Clintons have a long history of shady financial dealings, and apparently are still up to their old tricks.
Other than mileage, Hilary's State Dept service consisted "What difference does it make?" Shows you how much loyalty she has to those that are killed during her leadership.
While I worked for the State Dept (in IT) it was a violation to utilize personal email for duty. She was supposed to be leading by example and the same rules apply to her. She also had classified information on her personal computer/server. And yet, not only is she not incarcerated, but she wasn't even charged.
We won't go into the influence peddling her husband and she were involved in, under guise of charitable donations, or whatever they are calling their so-called "fund."
Does anyone remember the angry response she snapped when being interviewed in Africa? That goes a long way for being a "people person." Not to mention the quotes from the White House secret service and other service staff when she resided there.
Oh, how about their theft of items belonging to the White House (silverware/china) when they left. Of course, she DID say that they were penniless when they left D.C.

Yep, she is a real trustworthy example of D.C. politics....NOT!

Don't forget that she had the CIA kill Vince Foster when his niece, Jody Foster, was having an affair with John Hinkley.
Hillary also was famous for sneaking in dachunds late at night at the White House and having dog fighting betting nights with the rich and powerful in Washington. Her favorite dog, Pickles, was always the winner - go figure that the dog fights were fixed.

You obviously are misinformed and ignorant of the character of Bush. But, I have found that to be a standard for those that voted for the present mistake residing in the White House.

loser 1 Hussein Obamma liar in chief
loser 2 Hillary, ( Sir Edmund Haha) liar in waiting
but have no fear the elite of America ( professors, Judges, Media) will have their way and flush what is left of our great and wonderful country.

You are kidding, right? They will release them as soon as they DECLASSIFY THEM? If she had classified information on that unencrypted system, then there is no question that she committed a felony. The question is, why isn't she incarcerated? Look up the statute regarding the safe keeping of classified material.

There has not been a surplus since Eisenhower. Check out the climbing national debt. When they claim they are reducing the deficit, they are referring to the BUDGET deficit. That means that they are reducing the amount OVER the budget that they spend. Unfortunately, since Obama never had a budget, he can say anything he wishes.
Clinton did NOT have a budget. Go to Treasurydirect.gov and look at the stats. He signed a budget for Bush's first year that was unrealistic. There was no pay down of the national debt, therefore no reduced debt.

Correction: Clinton did NOT have a surplus.

I believe that quote suits this subject very well.

Gotta love it. I guess you didn't read or hear about what was recently revealed about the so-called Clinton "charity?" Look it up and see what a small percentage actually goes to "charity." Do you liberals purposely move about life with blinders.

I am sure that you are basing your OPINION of Billary on gender bias. And you comment is purely OPINION. And as far as demographics is concerned, you have obviously discounted the Independent voter. Right now, I believe you will find that the Independent voter is not so struck with Billary as you.